Top | Newest First | Oldest First
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
@HoraceGreenley
Thanks for the BC
Thanks for the BC
Piper · 61-69, F
I know that people make the often very difficult decision, for different reasons. Sometimes it's for health reasons, which answers the question without further commentary.
More people, I'm pretty sure, stop being consumers of animals and their 'products" for environmental and or animal suffering reasons. I think the point of being more at peace with oneself by trying to do less harm, is one other than self-righteousness.
More people, I'm pretty sure, stop being consumers of animals and their 'products" for environmental and or animal suffering reasons. I think the point of being more at peace with oneself by trying to do less harm, is one other than self-righteousness.
View 2 more replies »
Bumbles · 51-55, M
@EarthlingWise Let’s stop that then!
thinkingoutloud · F
Bumbles · 51-55, M
@thinkingoutloud Ironically, the whole point of being vegan is to judge.
@BlueGreenGrey well for at least one thing, how much do you know about the overuse of monoculture environments?
@stound I know the difference between monoculture, permaculture, et al.
The absence of animal agriculture does not automatically mean monocultural plant agriculture
You can also have biodiversity without animal agriculture
Moreover, the negative impacts of cattle ranching today are in no way offsetting anything with regard to, say, monocultural wheat fields or monocultural vineyards or monocultural paper pulp tree plantations
Slashing and burning Amazon rain forest to create more cattle ranches is not somehow [i]helping[/i] the enviroment or climate, it is doing the exact opposite, as tropical rainforests are a lot more effective at absorbing carbon than, say, temperate conifers
The absence of animal agriculture does not automatically mean monocultural plant agriculture
You can also have biodiversity without animal agriculture
Moreover, the negative impacts of cattle ranching today are in no way offsetting anything with regard to, say, monocultural wheat fields or monocultural vineyards or monocultural paper pulp tree plantations
Slashing and burning Amazon rain forest to create more cattle ranches is not somehow [i]helping[/i] the enviroment or climate, it is doing the exact opposite, as tropical rainforests are a lot more effective at absorbing carbon than, say, temperate conifers
MaliaAgain · 36-40, F
Queendragonfly · 31-35, F
Madmonk · M
I’m a second tier vegan
I do it for the health benefits
I do it for the health benefits
CrazyMusicLover · 31-35
Avoiding cheap low quality animal products that are commonly available in chain stores and fast foods in big cities. 😅
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
lumberjackslam · 41-45, M
anti-domesticated animal. there are more chickens than people and what are they gonna do if people no longer need their services? get a job at Walmart? BOK!
Lilnonames · F