Top | Newest First | Oldest First
Allelse · 36-40, M
No, I think the father was an idiot and should never have given his idiot son his inheritance and he certainly shouldn't have taken him back with loving arms. When the son came back he should have gotten his money back by selling the sod into slavery, you could do that back then.
KingofPizza2 · 36-40, M
And yet if the prodigal son would just apply himself to become a sorcerer, he could tap himself to deal one damage to any creature or player
@KingofPizza2 So do you agree with how he was treated?
JohnnySpot · 56-60, M
[ I was going to do a story about this before.
Not something to agree with, the way that it is.
Not something to agree with, the way that it is.
View 1 more replies »
@JohnnySpot an abstract even can shed light on the story
JohnnySpot · 56-60, M
the alignment of the stars the season of the apple
@JohnnySpot That might be a reason for the apple in Genesis but maybe not here
bugeye · 26-30, F
i think the son should have gone on to live his best life he could and not return to the family that cut him off and abandoned him.
NoGamesTolerated · F
Absolutely… That is representative of the love God has when s sinner repents and turns to him…
@NoGamesTolerated But maybe a bit unfair to the other son ?
TheOneyouwerewarnedabout · 41-45, MVIP
It was his son after all yes?
@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout So you agree?