This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
TinyViolins · 36-40, M
This is a fine example of where the forest gets lost for the trees. No one in their right mind could see a sign like that as condoning vile behavior.
There is a culture of overly-sensitive nitpicking in the US where people crave authority and control so badly that they'll find offense to something solely as a justification to enforce their will on others. It's a form of emotional manipulation that doesn't really get discussed as much as it should. Labeling everything as bigoted or harmful to children is minimizing actual examples of such simply to pompously promote yourself as a paragon of virtue. It's morally bankrupt
There is a culture of overly-sensitive nitpicking in the US where people crave authority and control so badly that they'll find offense to something solely as a justification to enforce their will on others. It's a form of emotional manipulation that doesn't really get discussed as much as it should. Labeling everything as bigoted or harmful to children is minimizing actual examples of such simply to pompously promote yourself as a paragon of virtue. It's morally bankrupt
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@TinyViolins This is true, there is no way that sign was harmful at all.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@TinyViolins plus the sign been there for four years




