Is Muslim religion even a religion or has it been evolved from The Bible itself?

Islam is since the first man Adam.

All prophets and messengers believe god in One God, Allah, though they were from different countries, sent to different nations, with different rules and scriptures, in different languages, but the one common point was Tawheed (Oneness in Lordship)

Islam is the religion like no other.
The Things the Quran has, the bible doesn't.
Though it is more the book of signs instead of science, it has scientific sings too.

It mentions the universe is expanding.
It meantions how the human body is formed before birth, in detail.
It mentiomes that everything in this universe in in an orbit.

How did Muhammed take.it from the bible, is this all mentioned?
How could Muhammed have known all this on his own, using no modern day inventions and when he couldn't even read or write, it is purely the revelation from Allah.

The thing is we believe all the scriptures were sent by God, but then they didn't remain reliable bcz people edited it, changed them, and made it all like a mixture. So god sent Quran as the final last book which yes confirms all the previous scriptures, but tells us that they are now no more word of god.

And Muslim religion has a name.
Its Islam.

Bible readers know much of the Bible is written in the genre of history, that is, historical narratives. Starting with Genesis and going all the way through to Esther, it is a (basically) continuous historical story. That is roughly half of the Old Testament. Although we sometimes think of Exodus, Leviticus, and Deuteronomy as the books of the Law of Moses, you will notice that the Law is actually recorded in history books, and it is related to us as readers as Moses tells the history of Israel. Furthermore, if you read the books of the prophets, you will of course see the record of the preaching they did in their day. But if you look more closely, you will find that the books of the prophets are very much like historical narratives themselves, and even more, the prophets often recalled the history of Israel and commented on the significance of that history. As the prophets were actually the true interpreters of Israel’s history. The result is that most of the Old Testament is written as history of one kind or another.

A similar phenomenon confronts us when we turn to the New Testament. Up front we get four accounts of the life of Christ – biographies, if you will, which are specialized forms of historical narratives. Then we get the book of Acts – the history of the earliest Christians. Again, about half the New Testament is written explicitly as history. The rest of the New Testament is made up of a collection of letters written by apostles and other early Christians. Although these are not written as historical accounts, they certainly give us “snapshots” of various “moments” in the lives of churches in the first century. So again, history dominates the collection.

I believe it is common that many people think of “doctrine” first when they think of the Bible. For many people, the Bible is a book that tells us religious truths. While that is true, it would be inaccurate to think of the Bible as if it were simply a digest or collection of religious doctrines (like some kind of ancient doctrinal encyclopedia). The fact is that the Bible is mostly history, and the doctrinal truths revealed in the Bible are presented as parts of the history.

What’s so important about history that God, in his providence, filled his book with it? While there are many facets to this question, let’s focus on one of them: history provides a people with a definition and an identity. That is one of its primary purposes, and this has been true ever since history began to be written. From ancient times until today, we write histories as an expression of who we are. Where we came from, where our ancestors came from, what they did, the struggles they endured, the victories they won – all of these things give us a sense of who we are.

@REMsleep Abraham was a historical person as recorded in the Book of Genesis chapter 11 to 25. The gravesite of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and their wives is recorded in Genesis chapter 49 verses 29 to 32, and is located in Hebron and has been known and is attested to for many centuries. He is revered by Jews, Christians, and Muslims. The Jewish people have attested to existence for 3800 years, and his name is mentioned by several ancient non-jewish historians as far back as 2300 years ago. These include Berosis, Alexander Polyhistor, Melo, Artapanus, Hecateus, and Nicholas Damascenus.

Moses was a historical person this Jewish tradition has been handed down for over 3,300 years by the entire Jewish nation and accepted by Christians and Muslims as well. Moses is mentioned many times in the Torah and Rabbinic literature. He is also mentioned by ancient non-jewish writers going back over 2300 years, including Hecataeus, Strabo, and others I have mentioned above. Non-religious ancient Jewish sources mention him to, such as Artapanus, Eupolomus, Josephus and Philo.

"Although critics contended that the Hebrew Bible is untrustworthy, time and time again, the archaeological record supports places, times, and events mentioned in Scripture." ( professor John Arthur Thompson, the Bible and Archeology) Jewish tradition of Hebrew descent, requires there to have been an Abraham and a Moses to lead the Hebrew people out of Egypt.

Islam is probably a sideline of Christianity, evolved from Christian circles who did not accept the Trinity dogma of the Nicaean council (or were unaware of it).
The "early history" of Islam as told by Muslims is most likely a typical religious founding myth, a construction that was setup much later. Chances are that Muhammad (which simply means "the praiseworthy one") never existed as a historical person. At least there are no reliable contemporary sources which might prove the existence of that person.
The following figures most likely never existed – they are just the embodiment of a founding narrative:
Abraham, Moses, Jesus, Muhammad.
Not sure about Buddha; Laozi is entirely legendary; there was never a historical Laozi.

@assemblingaknob [quote]So. Moving on. Next he says we don't need religious scholars to teach us the gospel. So now are you going to stand outside all the churches and protest for all the priests to step down? If what he says is the exact proof. This is what he believes in. We don't need scholars to teach us the gospel.[/quote]

Whatever God says in His Word we can count as the truth. Religion is just man-made philosophy. God is against religious teachers yes. He even scolded them in the temple. They were gambling in the temple. Their "religion" is empty without Christ as the center.

Religion didn't die on the cross for our sins. Jesus did. And there are sincere men of God that have been led by God to be ministers of the Word. God knows the fake ones by their words and actions. The religious teachers were the ones that treat religion as a business to haul in money. Jesus warned us to stay away from them in His Word. The ministers who truly have been called by God to preach, are a blessing to Him and He says not to forsake ourselves from assembling together in the church. As that is where we get our spiritual food and also from praying and reading the Word of God.

They have their own book which of course is the Quran. Their book is completely different than our Bible. They say it is not but I'm sorry to say it is. Many things in their book, and I respect their beliefs, that's up to them, but the things in the Quran do not match with God's Word.

Even Muslims believe Jesus was real.

and the bible was comissioned by a roman emperor with concepts like "you need to believe without proof because doubting is a sin" , not at all a brainwashing tool to control the masses, noooo. the bible is laegely sourced from the torah, its literally the "answer" to an old jewish prophesy. christians call the bible "the world of god" while it was written by many different autors over a very long period of time. at least the torah claims to be a message from an angel that mohamed transcibed, so it at least fits the description of a "reveiled" book, not that either is better than the other, they've both been detrimental to mankind. all abrahamic religions are toxic.

@assemblingaknob It is not the matter of personal belief. Your reference to it as my personal belief is WRONG and BIASED. You don't need to be a THEOLOGICAL SCHOLAR to understand the Gospel. If you need a personal assistant to do it for, God would be merciful enough to bless you with THE HOLY SPIRIT rather than some scholar.
This is the difference between you and Christians. You need the proof of a THEOLOGICAL SCHOLAR.
Our proof is The Living Holy Spirit and JESUS CHRIST is the living God merciful enough to have opened the gates of heaven for whosoever believes in him. We see prayers. You see proof.
We are guided by The HOLY SPIRIT. you are guided by an unknown gentry, unknown philosophers, theological philosophers, scientists and everyone to back up your hearsay.

Contrary to it, we believe in the words of The Living God who is our sacrificial Lamb, A sinless Lamb, whose blood has opened the doors of heaven. God, the father loves him so much that he takes care of the believers of his Son so well that inspite of you speaking ARABIC, you have to learn another language to give us your false proof but as the Lord said, "Beware of the wolves in sheep's clothing". I am in no way criticizing you for your belief but I want you to know the reality, I want you to know the covenants rather than believing in Theological scholars. The foundation which requires a constant proof of theological scholars to clear the doubts of its own people is not, in anyway set to the BASE.

Sorry for that. My point is we can all copy paste and say the same thing about any religion based on our personal beliefs and sound strongly opinionated based on confidently stated "facts" that we understand/believe to be true. But in fact none of us here on sw are theological scholars so it's all a wild goose chase on here because you won't get any sound sources in anything. There are some well researched unbiased theological scholarships in the form of books, and documentaries on youtube that cite their sources in the description, so those are better places to gain more knowledge on the historical background of different religions.

@JohnnySpot. John, what do you mean when you said:

Each of us must make himself worthy of the gift his Father gave him.

I personally believe it is the people who think they are good and thus all they have to do is follow a few petty rules and heaven's doors will open wide. That whole idea is nonsense. There is no one good but God. We have God's word on that.

Islam is the second most popular religion in the world do a little research if you want to know something about it.

@assemblingaknob The point is I openly came up as Christian and you, after several of your comments, are telling me not to guess your religion means you are being or trying to be clever in here. We practice simple life and don't deceive anyone in our consciousness.

It's a cult like mormonism.. Just like mormonism a guy claimed to have been contacted by an Angel of God and was given a message from God.. Of course the Holy Bible gave specific warning about angels giving messages that where contrary to the Bibles message..

Galatians 1:6-8"I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel: {7} Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ. {8} But though we, [c=7700B2][u]or an angel from heaven[/u][/c], preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed."

So muhammad of islam is accursed..

And joseph smith of mormonism is accursed..

Christianity is probably a sideline of Judaism, evolved from judaic circles who did not accept the monotheistic dogma of the jews (or were unaware of it).
The "early history" of Christianity as told by Christians is most likely a typical religious founding myth, a construction that was setup much later. Chances are that Jesus (which simply means "the saviour") never existed as a historical person. At least there are no reliable contemporary sources which might prove the existence of that person.
The following figures most likely never existed – they are just the embodiment of a founding narrative:
Abraham, Moses, Jesus, Muhammad.
Not sure about Buddha; Laozi is entirely legendary; there was never a historical Laozi.

The Koran evolved from the Bible, the Bible evolved from the Tanakh, and the Tanakh evolved from various Sumerian mythology.

Of course it's a religion. It coerces people in to behavior via text created to control. Just like [i]every[/i] religion.

Like Christianity coming from
Judaism? Maybe.

@assemblingaknob Islam is not a religion mentioned in Torah. He was a false prophet the moment he had bloodbath. God loved this world very much and never send prophets for massacre after the covenant was established.
Clearly, you want to see the proof of everything on YouTube and God said in his words not to test on him. You have a very nice teacher on youtube videos to which I don't want to comment.

*stolen is the correct term.

Is the "Christian religion" even real, or has it evolved from the Torah itself? like those who did not believe in Elohim and formed another group and made laws, largely according to their own personal will?

Islam is a business as is Christianity. If one refers to both as cults along with other religions one would not be wrong.

Bible + Torah + Own agenda that first makes the follower think like separatist then extremist and then..

the direct word of the God of Abraham as revealed to Muhammad

Yes.
Partly.

It is the failing of mankind to search without instead if within .

Bits and pieces. But like all other religions it is man made.