This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
smiler2012 · 61-69
{@wendylopez43 . maybe i am missing something on this one or but being niave . why is there a hidden gender involved on part of the seventeen year old to arouse suspicion on your part
WendyLopez43 · 26-30, F
@smiler2012 huh?!
cecile · F
@smiler2012 both sexes are mentioned twice ??
Adaydreambeliever · 56-60, F
@cecile I can't speak for the responder @smiler2012 but I think he is referring to the fact that there is implied impetus regarding the 17 year old.. that they are 'wanting' to date the 14 year old..
cecile · F
@Adaydreambeliever i think he meant hidden agenda not gender
smiler2012 · 61-69
@cecile i meant agenda sorry a typing error