Sharing a link to an article as "proof" isn't proof if the article just says its proof

Ya know... without actually showing the proof in the article...

You're just shifting the proof responsibility to somewhere else

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

WintaTheAngle · 41-45, M

Some of these claims aren’t worth the paper they are printed on.

Usually a university team or company will be credited for a discovery in an article. If it just says “psychologists say” it’s probably nonsense generated by the publication to sell trash to the gullible.

Fishy · 36-40, F

@WintaTheAngle Yeah they're all like: "its true because some dude who agrees with me says so"