She is there to answer questions about her interpretation of the law and how she has and will apply it.
I dont believe there is any law governing the definition of "woman". If there comes a time when such a question is presented to scotus, i feel certain she will rely on research from biolgists and other experts in that field.

Not a biologist? LOL. Wrong response for the woke. Biology makes it simple.
XX = female
XY = male
XXY and the other exceedingly rare variants are undetermined.

It's when you mix up biology with sociology and psychology that things become a hot mess.

She can't figure out when life begins either. Good thing she went into law because her understanding of biology is null and void.

she dodged the question, a winner right there

I can't help thinking there's something of a misogynistic and racist undercurrent to this post (as per usual, sadly).

Did you hear about this one?

She also gave out lenient sentences to child pornographers and worked to release terrorists from Gitmo. Even if a few Democrats defect, she'll be confirmed thanks to Collins, Mookowski, Pierre Delecto and a handful of spineless Repubs.

Yet they tell us all she will be first african american WOMAN on the supreme court?

The Democrats clearly have gone off the rails with their nonsense.

Another woke joke. Did you expect anything else from this feeble, corrupt old goon?

Well, another example of a fuckin idiot