Sad
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Biden's Black Female Nominee for SCOTUS Can Not Define What A Woman Is

When asked by Senator Marsha Blackburn to define the word 'woman'. Ketanji Brown Jackson refused to define the word 'woman' citing that she's 'not a biologist.

But she is a candidate for Supreme Court Justice. It seems strange to me that she could not come up with a definition. I mean, Come On Man - it's not a trick question.

Oh, she'll be confirmed, I'm sure of that. After all she's one of the left's best and brightest students of the New World Order. It just seems sad to me and adds yet another stain to the left.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Carla · 61-69, F
She is there to answer questions about her interpretation of the law and how she has and will apply it.
I dont believe there is any law governing the definition of "woman". If there comes a time when such a question is presented to scotus, i feel certain she will rely on research from biolgists and other experts in that field.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Carla With all the fuss over gender these days - you don't think she might need to know what a woman is? And does being a woman even qualify for rights under the law is it can't be defined?
hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M
@Carla When the law is rewriting the definition of 'woman' it might be germane to the discussion. Do try to keep up. Your liberal ignorance is very boring.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Carla
i feel certain she will rely on research from biolgists and other experts in that field.

Rely on biologists? Isn't her job as Supreme Court Justice to measure the question at hand with the Constitution?
Carla · 61-69, F
@Budwick questions not pertinent to the matter at hand.
When /if this matter comes before the court, i feel certain she will rely on experts instead of her personal feelings.
That is how it's supposed to work, bud.
Carla · 61-69, F
@hippyjoe1955 show me where the law is being rewritten.
Really though, what law?
hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M
@Carla Why? If you aren't already aware of it my pointing it out won't change your mind. You already decided to ignore facts. Have a nice life.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Carla OK Carla - I get it - you are willing to have a dunce on the court.

Or, could it be that answering the question would have led her into a political minefield? What would the activists say if she defined 'woman'?
Would she be excoriated like Kavanaugh was? Hated by Twitter?
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Carla
but smart enough to avoid said mine field

You think she avoided a mine field? Au contraire mon frère - Of course the leftist media will simply ignore any stupid thing she says, but who relies on CNN anymore - 12 viewers? People will know what a biased dope she is and that she still became a justice.

You wanna be happy and proud of that? You are no better than MarkPaul
Carla · 61-69, F
@Budwick i do recall the right installing a couple of biased dopes of late.
Watch where you throw stones, bud.
hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M
@Carla Such as? Were they hired because of their race and what is between their legs or were they hired because they were excellent judges. The thing that Biden nominated couldn't hold a candle to them.
Carla · 61-69, F
@hippyjoe1955 bwahaaa.🤣😂🤣. They were hired because they worshipped at the alter of trump and are opposed to roe.
Tell me...if two equally deducated and qualified judges were up for a scotus post, one was a black woman, one a white man....who would be chosen?

You cant answer that because although there are many qualified black women, none has ever been seriously looked at as a nominee.
Your arguement has no merit.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Carla
there are many qualified black women

But, Biden's ONLY qualifications were;

To Be black
To be female.

And the nominee under consideration doesn't know how to define what she is!

Does that make her more qualified?
MrBrownstone · 46-50, M
@Carla How can she rule on abortion? You have to know what a woman is first.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@MrBrownstone I think they call them 'birthing persons' now. LOL
SW-User
@Budwick Yes they do. And bleeders.

Guys are people with penises. This is a totally unserious society