This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
DearAmbellina2113 · 41-45, F
Oh wow, I never heard 'primitive' be used as a negative before. I have only heard it as an archeological term meaning "first" or "prime" (which is not a bad thing).
This is why it's probably a good idea to just ASK people what they prefer to be called or referred to as.
This is why it's probably a good idea to just ASK people what they prefer to be called or referred to as.
Astro · 56-60, M
@DearAmbellina2113 Primitive to me means backwards and uncivilized. Maybe I'm wrong and am being a cranky old man but I can see where you are coming from with archeology.
Neoerectus · M
@Astro Ever read the Chalice and the Blade? It is a misconception that older civilizations, even hunter gathers, were less sophisticated mentally or socially. Early anthropologists injected their own biases which has been getting corrected.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@Astro That is only your definition.
"Primitive" means only "First" _ the root is prime.
There is no evidence that primitive people were either backward or uncivilised, let alone both backward and uncivilised. The two adjectives are not synonyms.
Indeed some of their societies must have been very civilised to have left massive remains like Stonehenge and Machu Picchu.
Some might wonder if our modern civilisations are very civil, though...
"Primitive" means only "First" _ the root is prime.
There is no evidence that primitive people were either backward or uncivilised, let alone both backward and uncivilised. The two adjectives are not synonyms.
Indeed some of their societies must have been very civilised to have left massive remains like Stonehenge and Machu Picchu.
Some might wonder if our modern civilisations are very civil, though...