@meJess I remember that. There was something about having a tea party in Boston...

@meJess that is not true, they do have voting rights in their conus home of record, and pay taxes there. Even servicemembers are subject. The. Last home of record before I went overseas in the Navy was New York City. Although I was in Iceland, i paid both NY State and City taxes, but voted in NY.

@Tminus6453 don't forget the Chicago having a huge Zionist cult happening in the 1930's. sacrificing a child.

[media=https://www.youtube.com/shorts/EayCpYsODTs]

@BohoBabe what???

@samueltyler2 There's no such thing as "more perfect." If something is perfect, it can't get better. Something is perfect or it's not.
So the fact that the document says they want a "more perfect" union is something that makes me chuckle.

@BohoBabe I do not know why you are trying to start a fire, but are you ignorant of the preamble of the US Constitution? Do you need to use a disgusting term to describe a population that was not even involved at that time in the forging of the constitution?

A simple Google search:

What does it mean a more perfect Union?
AI Overview
"A more perfect union" is a phrase from the Preamble to the U.S. Constitution, which conveys that the nation is an ongoing project striving for its ideals. It is often used in political discourse to suggest that progress toward a stronger and more just nation requires continuous effort and the addressing of societal issues, such as those discussed in Barack Obama's 2008 presidential campaign speech of the same name. The phrase can also refer to a progressive news organization or various creative works like films and albums.
The Preamble to the U.S. Constitution: The original phrase, "in order to form a more perfect union," was the goal of the founders when establishing a new government.
Political and rhetorical use: The phrase is used to argue that the United States is not a finished work and that ongoing efforts are needed to achieve its founding goals, notes Wikipedia.
Barack Obama's 2008 "A More Perfect Union" speech: In this landmark speech, Obama used the phrase to address issues of race and unity in America, arguing that overcoming the nation's challenges was part of the ongoing work toward a more perfect union.
Other uses: The phrase has also been used as the title for various creative works, including a progressive news organization called More Perfect Union, a historical film titled A More Perfect Union (1980), and several albums and songs, according to Wikipedia.

More clarification, if this can penetrate your brain:

The Preamble
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/

To Form a More Perfect Union
The phrase “to form a more perfect union” is one of the stated purposes for establishing the constitution. To understand this phrase more fully, we must consider the historical context in which the constitution was written. Before the constitution, the United States was governed by the Articles of Confederation, which created a weak central government. Under the Articles, the states retained most of their sovereignty and operated more like independent entities rather than parts of a unified nation. This system led to several challenges that included economic issues, defense concerns, interstate disputes, and the lack of a central executive.
Without a strong central authority, there were disputes among states over tariffs and trade. Also, states printed their own money. This often led to confusion and inflation. The central government had difficulties raising an army and there was no consistent means of defending the nation in its entirety. States often had disputes over boundaries and other matters because the central government lacked an effective mechanism to resolve these issues. Finally, the Articles did not establish an executive branch to enforce laws or a judiciary to interpret them. This resulted in inefficient and mostly ineffective governance.
Given these challenges and the increasing desire to create a robust and lasting nation-state, the framers of the constitution aimed to establish a governmental structure that would be robust and more collaborative than that which existed under the Articles. In this context, “to form a more perfect union” meant they wanted to create a system of government that was more effective, cohesive, and united than as prescribed by the Articles. Furthermore, the phrase speaks to the aspiration of the framers. They did not want to claim the new system was perfect. They did, however, believe it would be a significant improvement to the Articles. For them, use of the words “more perfect” also implied eternal effort. The endeavor for the United States of America to always strive to improve and refine its union continues to this day.

https://jcldusafa.org/index.php/jcld/article/view/285/395

@Nimbus

That's a joke ..... right ?

@Reason10 No I didn't mean what you are assuming I meant. Women did not have the freedom to vote until 1920. African Americans had to sit at the back of a bus and give their seat up to white people right up to 1956, long live the memory of Rosa Parks. Your war heroes that are living on the street with severe mental illness and lost limbs. There are a lot of other things too.

@EBSVC Right, and we can run a society successfully on everyone operating independent businesses with no employees!

@BorealPedant
This would mean self-employment, and everyone is a "gun for hire".

@BorealPedant Everyone is rich and no one gets exploited. It’s totally perfect and real and will absolutely happen 🙃

@jshm2 What country offers more freedom, more opportunities for growth(until recently anyway)?

Why pick on Israel? How would you defend your country if from the first day of your existence there are others that want to wipe you off of the face of the earth?