Roundandroundwego · 61-69
If people don't mind the Democrats leading them to war against Russia with fiction, that's up to them!
View 12 more replies »
NoahB · 31-35, M
@Roundandroundwego sad but true unfortunately. So, if I may ask, what’s your cure for this? If you could implement one
Roundandroundwego · 61-69
@NoahB media plays a huge role, but a mass reaction against the results could occur within the US population, certainly alternative views are available for them to consume already online. I think some alternative media is produced to wake them. They could eventually wake up, stop pretending they have no role, here.
NoahB · 31-35, M
@Roundandroundwego alternative media is good, but it’s a double edged sword. Seen plenty of people get even more propagandized from it. People want to hear things that confirm their bias
Yes, but let's not forget that SCOTUS came up with that unprecedented ruling as a special favor to Trump.
It's not much of a leap to think he could get them to rethink the reasoning of their decision. In fact, most honest legal minds or even people who've read the Constitution might appreciate it.
It's not much of a leap to think he could get them to rethink the reasoning of their decision. In fact, most honest legal minds or even people who've read the Constitution might appreciate it.
KateATX · 41-45, F
SCOTUS said immunity for actions performed as the duty of being the POTUS. Suppressing intelligence, creating false intelligence and spying on a political opponent to influence the outcome of an election and after losing the election to assail the character of the winner of the election are not official duties of the POTUS. Obama and Billary have no immunity to prosecution.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
This message was deleted by its author.
NoahB · 31-35, M
@sunsporter1649 really? Interesting. The same reason? What reason would that be?
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@NoahB 'Splain to us what the reason is you held on to the files for 4 years and did nothing and the awnswer is obvious
NoahB · 31-35, M
@sunsporter1649 I think Biden held unto the files because he is fiercely loyal to the Democratic Party, and he’s been around long enough to know the Clinton’s are entangled with Epstein. I think Trump is holding into the files because he himself is also heavily entangled with Epstein.
Piper · 61-69, F
Yes, on all counts. It's almost funny, how ridiculous these claims are...and how jealous the current president has always very obviously been, of the former president who gracefully accepted him as the duly elected new president taking his place.
LamontCranston · M
Discrediting Obama is certainly sufficient, don't you think? (asking for a friend)
LamontCranston · M
@whowasthatmaskedman Yes, the weed of crime bears bitter fruit.
LamontCranston · M
@NoahB One of the great foes of evil everywhere.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@LamontCranston The Classics!..😷
fanuc2013 · 51-55, F
Possibly some of Obamas' minions could be charged. As they should be and find out if the charges are true! As the famous democrat saying, "No one is above the law".
Captainjackass · 31-35, M
But that applies only to him because he’s somehow special. He’s reportedly sexually assaulted someone in the oval office so Im wondering what crimes their actually able to cover up.
Patriot96 · 56-60, C
You might want to study up. Prez is not protected for engaging in ILLEGAL acts
NoahB · 31-35, M
@sunsporter1649 it’s almost like trumps Supreme Court picks aren’t competent in law…
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
NoahB · 31-35, M
@sunsporter1649 I thought republicans liked pedophillia now? Trump is going to pardon ghislaine Maxwell and everything
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
Just about every part of that trump statement is a lie. I have no idea why anyone pays attention any more.. Get your news from someplace outside America..😷
NoahB · 31-35, M
@whowasthatmaskedman honestly.
Vin53 · M

whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@Vin53 "O.D.S"😷
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@jackieash Trust me. There is worse to come...😷
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
Trump's Supreme Court meant for whites specfically though so it doesn't count for Obama.
TexChik · F
@SatanBurger Good weed today?
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@TexChik So what would you call it when Trump does things he should be arrested for but if a democrat did the same actions you'd be crying 😢
What I said was accurate.
What I said was accurate.
Elessar · 31-35, M
SCOTUS will have a second hearing on how presidential immunity only applies if you're orange
IM5688 · 61-69, M
But Obama was not the president when he allegedly helped set up the Russia hoax.
ElwoodBlues · M
@IM5688 says
Lemme look this up.
But Obama was not the president when he allegedly helped set up the Russia hoax.
Lemme look this up.
She [Tulsi Gabbard] declassified documents and said the information she was releasing showed a “treasonous conspiracy” in 2016 by top Obama administration officials to undermine Trump, claims that Democrats called false and politically motivated.
Remind us, @IM5688, who was president in 2016???
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
NoahB · 31-35, M
@sunsporter1649 didn’t Trump win the election after Obama?
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@NoahB Ah, we get it, breaking the law is ok, as long as you failed, right. And who cares what happened after the election to serew up the transition and termof the incoming President, as long as the demonocrats are doing it, right?
NoahB · 31-35, M
@sunsporter1649 of course not. Lock Obama and Hillary up if you can actually prove the wrong doing and not just bluster in press conferences. But since Trump is already declassifying Obama’s ‘collusion’ he should also declassify the Epstein files while he’s at it
Musicman · 61-69, M
That certainly didn't stop the Democrats from coming after him numerous times.
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
In Cry-Baby-trump's fantasy, that ruling is not retroactive.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
BohemianBabe · M
That's why they're gonna put Obama in black jail. It's a special jail.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Only if it's legal
Meaning only if their actions fall within the parameters of their office, sabotaging the election and defaming the prez is sedition
NoahB · 31-35, M
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
@NoahB No, immunity ONLY when actions are done within the Constitutional parameters of the office, NOT outright crime.
NoahB · 31-35, M
@NativePortlander1970 take it up with Trump. He’s the one that said the immunity ruling helps Obama not me