This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Yes, but let's not forget that SCOTUS came up with that unprecedented ruling as a special favor to Trump.
It's not much of a leap to think he could get them to rethink the reasoning of their decision. In fact, most honest legal minds or even people who've read the Constitution might appreciate it.
It's not much of a leap to think he could get them to rethink the reasoning of their decision. In fact, most honest legal minds or even people who've read the Constitution might appreciate it.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
ElwoodBlues · M
@sunsporter1649 Biden was busy cleaning up tRump's Covid mess. tRump made releasing the Epstein files a campaign promise.
Remember how Republicans were for releasing the Epstein files before they were against it🤣😂
Remember how Republicans were for releasing the Epstein files before they were against it🤣😂
@TexChik Well, you have a point that all I have to go on is what the Justices were willing to put in writing.
But, I daresay that any analysis of the "President's rights"is suspect. Others may disagree as to divinely given rights, but the Constitution doesn't give him any more "rights" than anyone else.
Mercifully, if I remember correctly, the issue was privilege and immunity necessary to do the job. If they were thinking about Trump's rights as a sovereign, I dont remember anyone writing about it.
But, I daresay that any analysis of the "President's rights"is suspect. Others may disagree as to divinely given rights, but the Constitution doesn't give him any more "rights" than anyone else.
Mercifully, if I remember correctly, the issue was privilege and immunity necessary to do the job. If they were thinking about Trump's rights as a sovereign, I dont remember anyone writing about it.
KateATX · 41-45, F
SCOTUS said immunity for actions performed as the duty of being the POTUS. Suppressing intelligence, creating false intelligence and spying on a political opponent to influence the outcome of an election and after losing the election to assail the character of the winner of the election are not official duties of the POTUS. Obama and Billary have no immunity to prosecution.
This message was deleted by its author.
NoahB · 31-35, M
@sunsporter1649 really? Interesting. The same reason? What reason would that be?
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@NoahB 'Splain to us what the reason is you held on to the files for 4 years and did nothing and the awnswer is obvious
NoahB · 31-35, M
@sunsporter1649 I think Biden held unto the files because he is fiercely loyal to the Democratic Party, and he’s been around long enough to know the Clinton’s are entangled with Epstein. I think Trump is holding into the files because he himself is also heavily entangled with Epstein.
LamontCranston · M
LamontCranston · M
@whowasthatmaskedman Yes, the weed of crime bears bitter fruit.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@LamontCranston The Classics!..😷
Captainjackass · 31-35, M
NoahB · 31-35, M
@sunsporter1649 I just find the timing odd. They dredge up this phoney story about Obama rigging an election Trump won right when people are asking him to release the Epstein files?
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@NoahB Ah, we get it, breaking the law is ok, as long as you failed, right. And who cares what happened after the election to serew up the transition and termof the incoming President, as long as the demonocrats are doing it, right
NoahB · 31-35, M
@sunsporter1649 you copy pasted this from another comment you made. I already replied to this.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
TexChik · F
@SatanBurger Good weed today?
ElwoodBlues · M
@IM5688 says
Lemme look this up.
But Obama was not the president when he allegedly helped set up the Russia hoax.
Lemme look this up.
She [Tulsi Gabbard] declassified documents and said the information she was releasing showed a “treasonous conspiracy” in 2016 by top Obama administration officials to undermine Trump, claims that Democrats called false and politically motivated.
Remind us, @IM5688, who was president in 2016???
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@NoahB Ah, we get it, breaking the law is ok, as long as you failed, right. And who cares what happened after the election to serew up the transition and termof the incoming President, as long as the demonocrats are doing it, right?
NoahB · 31-35, M
@sunsporter1649 of course not. Lock Obama and Hillary up if you can actually prove the wrong doing and not just bluster in press conferences. But since Trump is already declassifying Obama’s ‘collusion’ he should also declassify the Epstein files while he’s at it
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment