Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »
Top | New | Old
gol979 · 41-45, M
The state should not be involved in these matters. And we can see why from the government of canada, MAID. Gives me the creeps.
emiliya · 22-25, F
@gol979 Yes, they should have no involvement in the desire of patients to die.

Bleed · 41-45, F
It’s a good start. I’d like to get to where I can state at which point I want to be euthanised. Examples like locked in syndrome where i can’t move or communicate. But especially with dementia. Both grandparents went out that way and I don’t want to go through that. At the end my grandma couldn’t remember how to swallow. She kept trying to drink and it would all come back out. 6 days it took her to die from dehydration. 6! We wouldn’t allow dogs to suffer like that so why should we??
emiliya · 22-25, F
@Bleed Why do you need assistance from the state?

“She kept trying to drink and it would all come back out.”

Why did she not have intravenous fluids? Are you saying her doctor and her family allowed her to pass from dehydration? You do not need to say you need fluids for others, especially doctors, to know you need fluids. We need hydration every day. This seems to be negligence.
@emiliya Many dying people feel more comfortable if they're allowed to dehydrate. Hospice workers will tell you this. Forcing a dying person to remain hydrated when they don't want to is either misinformed or sadistic.
CountScrofula · 41-45, M
Dear friend of mine elected for MAID (medical assistance in dying) when she had terminal cancer. It was a kindness. I'm strongly in favour of this right.
emiliya · 22-25, F
@CountScrofula This is unfortunate.
Assisted suicide is a compassionate response to the technology that can prolong human life past the point of reason and dignity. It's evil to force people to spend their last days in unimaginable suffering. This legislation is long overdue. Unfortunately, the sadistic religious lunatics in the US that derive pleasure from others' suffering will never allow this here. Regardless, people are able to take matters into their own hands, albeit not always effectively.

One of my friends died a few years ago from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. He was a high school science teacher. He said as a scientist and an educator, he felt obligated to explain his condition to others, and posted a graph on Facebook showing his declining lung function over time until it intersected the line where it would be incompatible with life. He was able to set aside enough morphine to deliberately overdose himself when he reached the point where he was unable to raise his arm without getting out of breath. When the time came, he was wheeled out to his back deck, and exited life surrounded by his family. It would have been better if he'd been able to get a prescription for this instead of having to rely on subterfuge by denying medication to himself when he needed it in order to have enough to exit life on his own terms.
emiliya · 22-25, F
@LeopoldBloom You say he chose to kill himself by overdosing on morphine. I would prefer to do this than ask a doctor to burden himself with my death.

What happens when the Doctor Deaths deceive their patients? And the lazy doctors who cannot be bothered to do their job by helping their patients?
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
emiliya · 22-25, F
@Thrust He does seem to have a passion for these heinous things.
Pretzel · 70-79, M
the last 6 months are probably filled with pain.

I think it is a prime example of "my body, my choice"

and it shouldn't take a panel of experts
Pretzel · 70-79, M
@emiliya agreed
@emiliya Does it give you pleasure to imagine people spending their last days in hopeless pain? I sincerely hope you're not in the medical profession.
emiliya · 22-25, F
@LeopoldBloom No.

I was in the profession when I was a medical student, and could be again if I returned to finish my degree.
KiwiBird · 36-40, F
Voluntary Assisted Dying or VAD is available in South Australia.

Strictly controlled.

Six month life expectancy

Obviously the person involved has to have mental capacity to make decisions on their health care. Independently assessed by two suitably qualified medical professionals and there are over 70 safeguards. Not an easy process.

Obviously those with advanced dementia would not be eligible.
emiliya · 22-25, F
@KiwiBird How explicit do they have to be in their request to die in South Australia?
emiliya · 22-25, F
@KiwiBird Is it common practice?
KiwiBird · 36-40, F
@emiliya You replied to my comment on S Aust.

All Australian States and Territories have their own Laws. Enacted between 2019 and 2024.

There has not been a rush....it isn't for everyone.
SunshineGirl · 36-40, F
The Bill passed through the Commons stage yesterday. It is some way off becoming law yet, and will certainly undergo further revision.

Its primary purpose is avoid criminalising people for making rational and compassionate decisions. And to ensure that this option is not available only to those who can afford a private clinic in Switzerland.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
@emiliya Because there is no such thing as a "natural death." Medical technology exists. A "natural death" would involve putting someone on an ice floe - is that what you're advocating?
SunshineGirl · 36-40, F
@emiliya Natural deaths frequently involve intolerable suffering. Do not judge others until you have stood in their shoes.
Wiseacre · F
I’m a great supporter of MAID.
emiliya · 22-25, F
@Wiseacre This does not surprise me.
Wiseacre · F
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
@emiliya You have yet to provide a single one. There is no valid reason for using the state to force a religion based policy of cruelty that directly violates the oath of all doctors.


And great job calling it "state backed" to try and make it sound scary. Literally the only thing it means is you will not be prosecuted for helping someone die with dignity and in peace and putting their family out of their suffering too.
emiliya · 22-25, F
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow It is state-backed when it is passed by the state. This has been passed by the state. We are dealing with reality.

I do not believe a doctor should have the right to administer death to their patients, and I do not believe the patient should ever ask this of their doctor. Do others who wish to commit suicide ask their doctor to do it for them? Why do they need the state to do it for them?
@emiliya Umm no. That is just you using terms to make it looks scary. It literally means nothing beyond you won't be arrested for allowing someone to die peacefully.


Your personal feelings are irrelevant. Someone should not have to die a horrible painful death because of your feelings. And you don't have the right to impose your feelings on the entire population.


The state is not doing anything. You are lying by implying they are. Literally the only aspect that involves the state at all is not prosecuting people for allowing people to choose a way out.

Quit pretending this is like the death penalty. It is not. And it is deliberately dishonest to suggest it is.
That automated system doesn't speak for all, so that is a no
MasterLee · 56-60, M
Canada legalized it long ago. They call it healthcare.
It's a slippery slope that leads right down into offing the poor and people we hate. So, no on that.
@Roundandroundwego It doesn't surprise me that you would find some way to twist medical care into class warfare.
@LeopoldBloom I'm just thinking about the family I know best and their loud pronouncements that it should have been me not my brother who died.
FreestyleArt · 36-40, M
That's not good. More against God's laws
emiliya · 22-25, F
@KiwiBird He gave us free will. What did he give us free will to do?
KiwiBird · 36-40, F
@emiliya Free Will is the right to do whatever you choose. Every choice may have consequences. That is Life in a nutshell.
emiliya · 22-25, F
@KiwiBird We can choose evil over obedience and goodness, which is what abortion and state-backed suicide are. It does not escape the attention of God. When Adam and Eve choose to listen to Satan, humanity was cursed, but there is redemption through Christ.

A doctor is there to intervene to save lives, not end them. He and the state have no right to end them.
Adults should be allowed to do what they want with their own bodies.
@emiliya Please cite the Bible verse that says people who commit suicide go to hell.
emiliya · 22-25, F
@LeopoldBloom Murder is a sin. You should know that “lo tirtzach” is one of the Ten Commandments. It is a sin to take the lives of others and a sin to take your own life.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
iamthe99 · M
@emiliya Yes. What is your point? Do you have a problem with it on religious grounds? If so, I'm out.
emiliya · 22-25, F
@iamthe99 What do you think about morality? I assume you have morals? I think God is morality. Suicide, assisted or not, is a mortal sin. I am also guided by my politics, which tell me that the state should not pass legislation making it legal for doctors to not only administer the suicide poison to patient, but suggest it.

Perhaps the patient can live for more than six months, perhaps there is a cure, perhaps there will be a miracle, perhaps doctor is wrong, perhaps the doctor wants to get rid of the patient, perhaps the state is looking to save money...

Why can't you think of these things?
iamthe99 · M
@emiliya Because all those reasons are religious claptrap. We're done here.
Irony can't die if never alive, pointless post
Thrust · 56-60, M
Totally wrong. And it will attract every ghoul like Kevorkian who has a death fetish 👎
emiliya · 22-25, F
@Thrust Yes. It is easy to look at the scans and the tests and make certain judgments, but doctors are often vague. Treatments can work even when there is a poor prognosis. Miracles are known to happen. Good science that saves lives is known to happen.
Many US states have had dr assisted suic*de since the 90's
emiliya · 22-25, F
@NativePortlander1970 Many? I thought it was only Oregon? Most of the states allowing it began to in last ten years.

 
Post Comment