Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

What can be done about wealth inequality? How can we fix our world?

Tax the rich. It's that simple.

I saw this video where someone was asking a random 20-something girl in the street what she thinks needs to be done about the economy and she said tax the rich, even just 2%. Then the video broke down what that 2% could pay for.

In the comments, it blew my MIND! People were up in arms saying 'why should they be taxed 2%, they've worked for it they deserve it!'

And this is what we're really up against: normal people being so enamoured by the lie that they may too one day be mega rich that they take it as a personal attack, when in reality they're actually getting materially poorer but supporting this delusion.

Once you've become a billionaire, you can then probably make 5% in passive income. That's approximately $50 million per year, or $1 million a week. What can you do with that money? Honestly? Only one thing you really can do: buy assets, buy shares, buy properties. And by doing this, the cost of living goes up for everyone else, your kids won't be able afford a house, etc., etc..

The rich have outgrown the economy. If the status quo continues, a few hundred people in the world will literally end up owning EVERYTHING; even the merely wealthy won't be able to survive.

Tax the rich. It's the only option.
Top | New | Old
Dainbramadge · 56-60, M
There sure is an awful lot of talk about rich people and how they spend their money lately.
I myself, really don't care about what other people have, only what I have or don't have.
Just because someone has more than I do doesn't mean they should share with me.
It's actually none of my business how much of anything anyone else has than me.
All I need to worry about is me and if I need to improve my income than I do what I can to do that.
Nobody owes anyone anything except for life,liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
One of the considerable issues with a wealth tax is establishing the value of that wealth. Not only the value but the ownership. The super rich may have many assets which are unique and would require specialist valuations. This would be very admin intensive. Various elements of their wealth may be hidden and disputes over ownership would inevitably end up in lengthy and costly court cases.

It's pretty easy to assess the wealth of your average person as pretty much everything that they are likely to own will have an off the shelf value, excluding the odd heirloom. Its much more complex to assess the value of collector's items, the value of which may change exponentially from year to year and would need to be reassessed each year with another specialist valuation.

It's not that some form of wealth tax is impossible, but the wrong form of wealth tax could be extremely admin intensive and complex. It could tie up the court system and would also result in some leakage of wealth as a small number of the super rich move their wealth elsewhere.
It is hoarding money. Some have more money than they could spend in 100 lifetimes, while some have several jobs and still atruggle to pay for basics. Tax cuts will only benefit the wealthiest, those on modest income wouldnt really notice the difference. Some chief execs "earn" over 100 times the amount that blue colar workers do. Does that mean they work 100 times harder? Of course not. As I said, they ate hoarding money. If they were hoarding excess items like clothes or books, that would be seen as a problem. But because it's money, it is worshipped.
HotPizza71 · 51-55, M
But with all the tax dodges they do,we pay more tax than some rich folk!!!
MasterLee · 56-60, M
@HotPizza71 in percentage. Not in dollars.
HotPizza71 · 51-55, M
@MasterLee yes.. actually,was less percentage..
MasterLee · 56-60, M
@HotPizza71 Doing the math, Buffett ends up with a personal tax liability from Berkshire of over $1.5 billion.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
JimboSaturn · 56-60, M
Unfortunately, taxes are going to lowered for the rich once again in the Trump administration.

 
Post Comment