Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Do u believe DEI should be banned in the USA 🇺🇸

It stands for Diversity Equity Inclusion.
This is not a quota program.
It's a program that endorses businesses to hire people
who would otherwise not be hired. And yes they must be qualified. This includes gender and religion and the disabled. As of right now this program has been discontinued. There are some who feel that DEI has nullified skill. It overlooks the qualifed. And promotes discrimination.
Do you believe that DEI should be banned.🚫
Best answer wins. 🤔🇺🇸

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
3Dogmatic · 46-50, M
In theory, it sounds good, yet in practice it is hot garbage. Look at the mess that Los Angeles is in. That falls squarely on putting the wrong people in the wrong jobs purely due to their identities and not their qualifications.
Zonuss · 46-50, M
@3Dogmatic Then penalize the business. Not the program. This isn't over. You know this. Discrimination will be exposed.
3Dogmatic · 46-50, M
@Zonuss it’s hard to penalize the government when the citizens are being penalized by the city burning
Zonuss · 46-50, M
@3Dogmatic False. Any business that violates DEI should be penalized. The solution is simple. ☺
JimboSaturn · 56-60, M
@3Dogmatic Why do you assume LA had to do with DEI?
Zonuss · 46-50, M
@3Dogmatic The state of California is and has been a hot mess for years now. Not because Los Angeles has a Black Woman as a mayor. 🙄
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
3Dogmatic · 46-50, M
@Zonuss no, but the fires are due to gross negligence due to the fire chief and the mayor being more worried about the LGBTQRSTUV bunch than making sure reservoirs are full for fire season and brush is cleared out. The job entails keeping the city safe first, and they failed. Everything else is ancillary to the prime mission.
JimboSaturn · 56-60, M
@3Dogmatic But is it? Not really. That's a bunch of nonsense. Hateful nonsense.
3Dogmatic · 46-50, M
@JimboSaturn those are great facts you layed out to back that statement…

…oh wait…
JimboSaturn · 56-60, M
@3Dogmatic Where are your facts? ohhh wait!
JimboSaturn · 56-60, M
@3Dogmatic Did the current mayor and fire chief remove water tanks from the city because they are so woke? lol. Utter nonsense man.
3Dogmatic · 46-50, M
@JimboSaturn just the reply I expected. Do I need to dig up the pictures of empty fire reservoirs? Do I need to find the fire fighters saying there was no water in the hydrants? Does the fact that the insurance companies reaction to the California legislation fall on your deaf ears? They pulled out because it was a lose/lose situation that California created.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
3Dogmatic · 46-50, M
@JimboSaturn DEI was just one of the pillars that held up the foundation. Was to the primary cause? Maybe. Did it contribute? Absolutely. Anything that takes away from the public safety should be deleted. Feelings and visuals have no place in safety practices.
JimboSaturn · 56-60, M
@3Dogmatic How can DEI be a pillar of a natural disaster? What foundation? How does DEI take away from public safety? Does fair hiring cause firefighters to work poorly? lol How did feelings and visuals erode safety? Can you be specific? Here are some facts:

https://www.factcheck.org/2025/01/what-we-know-about-what-led-to-the-l-a-wildfires/

An excerpt below:







Was poor vegetation management to blame?
Soon after the L.A. wildfires began wreaking havoc, a common narrative emerged claiming that poor vegetation management was a key reason why these fires have been so bad.

Donald Trump Jr., for example, stated in an Instagram post mocking California Gov. Gavin Newsom that “proper brush mitigation was ignored for years.”

Other posts have highlighted President-elect Donald Trump’s previous comments blaming Newsom and a lack of forest “raking” or “clean[ing]” of forest floors for wildfires. “Still true,” an Instagram post said of a 2019 Trump tweet.

But as we explained then — and as experts told us once again — while proper forest management is an important part of reducing severe fire risk in forests, it’s a different situation in the grass- and shrubbery-dominated landscape where the current fires are burning in Southern California. (In a Jan. 13 interview with Newsmax, Trump repeated this and other false claims.)

Not only is vegetation management of that ecosystem not particularly helpful in reducing wildfire risk, but active management of the chaparral could backfire. “If the government had requested to remove more chaparral, in a way it could have created an even worse situation,” Syphard said.

That’s because when chaparral is removed, invasive grasses — which are more flammable — move in, heightening the fire risk.

Even putting in more fuel breaks, Syphard said, is not always a good idea, because if a person is not there to fight the fire, the break area can also increase fire risk.

“In Southern California, creating a fuel break means cutting down the chaparral and converting it to grass,” she said. “When you convert it to grass, if an ember lands on that fuel break, it might actually start a new spot fire.”

Particularly with the high winds typical of the season, wildfires will easily cross fuel breaks, Syphard added, noting that embers have jumped across 15-lane freeways.

“Landscape-scale reduction of chaparral will not stop wind-driven wildfires from spreading,” she said.

That’s not to say that property owners shouldn’t keep better tabs on their own plants. Removing vegetation around homes or other structures is recommended, Syphard said.

But other than better enforcement of defensible space rules, she said she did not think the government could have done anything more with vegetation management that would have helped with these fires.

“[L]ack of vegetation management is not what went wrong in these fires,” she said.
Zonuss · 46-50, M
@sunsporter1649 No. It's because California is a Liberal sesspool and always has been.
jehova · 31-35, M
No its because politicians are post retirement age and not the same diversity as those they represent. @3Dogmatic @Zonuss
missyann · 56-60
@3Dogmatic I agree with you Equal Opportunity NOT outcomes. If you are the most. Qualified.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
calicuz · 56-60, M
@3Dogmatic

No one can blame the tragedy in L.A. on DEI. The Mayor is an elected official who is Voted into office by the residents of that community. The "Lesbian" fire officials that MAGA is trying to use as an example of DEI being to blame for those fires is nothing more than political rhetoric at the least, and blatant bigotry at the worst. The Fire Chief of Los Angeles is appointed by the Mayor, so criticize the Mayor yes, but no one can blame DEI.
Gavin Newsom is as big a failure as they come when it comes to elected officials, and those who can not govern, and he is neither a woman, a Black woman, nor a lesbian women. Why do we not hear the MAGAS blaming Newsome, could it be that there is no political rhetoric to spew because Newsome is White heterosexual Christian male?

Please start to read some solid journalism before repeating the words of you bigoted political and religious leaders. Please begin to think for yourself.

I found a good Time Magazine article on the subject.


https://time.com/7206543/the-los-angeles-fires-have-nothing-to-do-with-dei/


You do believe Time Magazine, don't you?
JimboSaturn · 56-60, M
@calicuz Aren't you also a resident of LA? I think I will take your word against racist bigotry. Well said my man!
Zonuss · 46-50, M
@3Dogmatic False. The fires were started....let's blame the people who actually lighted the fire. 🔥
Zonuss · 46-50, M
@jehova No it's because politicians don't care about you. Bottom line. Prove me wrong. ☺
3Dogmatic · 46-50, M
@calicuz you can’t honestly tell me that the fire chief was the best person for the job seeing how this whole debacle played out. The fact that she is a lesbian could be complete coincidence why she was appointed. A root cause failure analysis needs to be done, but I doubt it will be. The fires in California are not new, and there should be data to predict and prevent this from happening to the extent it did. But, it could all just be climate change too. The truth lies somewhere in the middle, and DEI (while not the primary cause) played some responsibility. The failure of the fixed fire systems (hydrants, pumps, reservoirs, etc.) falls squarely on the fire chief not managing the district chiefs and the organization as a whole.

You are 100% correct thaw Newsome started all of this with the incompetence and it trickles down the food chain to the local governments. Nothing will change until the voters get fed up with it.
calicuz · 56-60, M
@JimboSaturn

Thank you, but I actually grew up in cali, but now live in the Midwest.