Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Trump’s Canada Fantasy: How Annexation Talk Could Spark World War 3"


The Domino Effect of Expansionism:
If the U.S. ever seriously tried to annex Canada, it would send a loud and clear message to the world: "Screw sovereignty, the strong do what they want." And trust me, that’s a Pandora’s box nobody wants to open. Once that door is cracked, every power-hungry nation on the planet would start eyeing their neighbors like a buffet. Here’s how it could play out:

China and Taiwan: China’s been drooling over Taiwan for decades, calling it a "breakaway province" while Taiwan thrives as its own independent thing. If the U.S. grabs Canada, you can bet China will speed up its plans to snatch Taiwan—probably with tanks, jets, and a whole lot of chaos.

Russia and Beyond: Putin’s already knee-deep in Ukraine, but if expansionism becomes the new normal, why stop there? Georgia, Moldova, maybe even Poland—anywhere the old Soviet flag once flew could be back on the menu.

Everyone Else: India and Pakistan over Kashmir? Israel and Palestine? Argentina and the UK over the Falklands? Forget diplomacy—why talk when you can just take? The world would turn into a free-for-all, with every country grabbing whatever land they can.

And here’s the kicker: Trump says he won’t use military force, but he’s mentioned using economic plans to strong-arm Canada into annexation. Think tariffs, trade wars, and economic pressure designed to force Canada’s hand. It’s like saying, "I won’t punch you, but I’ll starve you until you give me what I want." That’s not just aggressive—it’s a blueprint for other nations to follow. If the U.S. can use economic coercion to annex Canada, what’s stopping China from doing the same to Taiwan or Russia to Eastern Europe?

Erosion of International Norms:
The whole world runs on one basic rule: Nations have the right to exist without getting stomped by their neighbors. But if the U.S. throws that rule out the window, it’s game over for global stability. Here’s what happens next:

Back to Imperialism: Remember when empires like Britain and France just took whatever they wanted? Yeah, that could make a comeback. Powerful nations would carve up weaker ones like it’s the 1800s all over again.

Alliances Fall Apart: NATO? The UN? The EU? Forget about it. These organizations only work if everyone agrees to play by the rules. If the U.S. starts breaking them, the whole system collapses.

Arms Race 2.0: Every country would start building up their military, not for defense, but for conquest. It’s like a high-stakes game of Risk, except with real nukes and real consequences.

Risk of World War:
Let’s be real: if multiple countries start grabbing land at the same time, it’s not going to end well. Here’s why:

Alliances and Entanglements: Countries are tied together by defense treaties. If China invades Taiwan, the U.S. might jump in, dragging in Japan, Australia, and half of NATO. If Russia goes after Poland, NATO has to respond. Before you know it, it’s not just a regional conflict—it’s World War III.

Nuclear Nightmare: The U.S., China, and Russia all have enough nukes to turn the planet into a smoking crater. If things get out of hand, someone’s going to push the button. And once that happens, it’s game over for everyone.

Economic Meltdown: Global trade would grind to a halt. Supply chains? Gone. Food and fuel? Good luck finding any. The modern world runs on cooperation, and war would blow that to pieces.

Why This Scenario is Unlikely (But Still Dangerous):
Okay, let’s be honest: the U.S. annexing Canada is about as likely as pigs flying. But here’s the problem—when someone like Trump throws around these ideas, even as a joke, it makes other leaders think, "Hey, if they can do it, why can’t we?" And that’s how you get chaos. Even if it’s just talk, it plants the seed for disaster.

The Importance of Diplomacy and International Cooperation:
So, how do we stop this madness? It’s simple: play by the rules.

Strengthen International Institutions: The UN, NATO, and other organizations need to step up and keep everyone in check. No more letting bullies run the playground.

Promote Diplomacy: Talk it out. Negotiate. Compromise. War should always be the last resort, not the first option.

Reject Expansionist Rhetoric: Leaders need to stop throwing around dangerous ideas, even if they’re just trying to sound tough. Words have consequences, and in this case, the consequences could be catastrophic.

Conclusion:
The idea of the U.S. annexing Canada might sound like a bad joke, but it’s a reminder of how fragile the world really is. If powerful nations start grabbing land—whether by force, economic pressure, or sheer intimidation—it’s not just Canada or Taiwan or Ukraine that’s at risk. It’s the entire global order. And let’s be real: nobody wins in a world war. The cost is too high, the stakes are too big, and the fallout would last for generations.

So, instead of dreaming about empire-building, let’s focus on keeping the peace. Because at the end of the day, a stable world is a hell of a lot better than a smoking crater.

Final Note:
"I am not a politician, and this article does not intend to promote any particular political agenda or spread hate. My goal is simply to raise awareness about the potential dangers of expansionist rhetoric and policies. I believe that open and honest discussions about these critical issues are crucial for preventing potential disasters and ensuring a peaceful and prosperous future for all."
nudistsueaz · 61-69, F
Don't have a stroke. Just political BS
Sterler45 · 36-40, M
Both countries should become part of Great Britain again. Problem solved.
FreddieUK · 70-79, M
@Sterler45 Please NO!! Canada is doing well enough without us interfering and the best thing that happened was the USA independence giving a place for unfettered individualism to flourish and show the rest of the world where that could end up.
@Sterler45 Greenland was never part of Great Britain. Canada is still in the Commonwealth (its head of state is Prince Charles), so if we annex them, do we become a colony of Great Britain again?
MasterLee · 56-60, M
@Sterler45 I don't believe the UK could handle our demands for freedom.
Gibbon · 70-79, M
Oh more fear mongering. The mentality is built on insanity to bring fear to the masses.
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@Gibbon Maybe your "team", should be a bit better in communication. But selfreflection isn't part of the teams MO.
So a man who I don't believe has the rights of a voter in the United States is making world wide threats? I don't want Trudeau as a leader. As a Canadian I don't want the US as an additional province as the US provides absolutely nothing tempting about joining them. We've got health care, we've got jobs, we've got what we want here
zonavar68 · 56-60, M
@Justafantasy Main thing you have in Canada is a 'we do not need god or guns' culture. Trump wants to 'export' the US 'god and guns' culture to the rest of world (starting with Panama, Greenland and perhaps Canada).
nudistsueaz · 61-69, F
@Justafantasy No one wants another country
I think the whole Greenland Panama Canada thing is the conman's trick to distract from his soon-to-be-broken campaign promises.

Tяump promised lower grocery & gas prices, millions more deportations, and tariffs that would reduce the deficit. He can't deliver, so he's trying to distract.


Oh look, SQUIRREL!!
TexChik · F
Ifs and buts...Trump was only kidding. Canada is depending on the money they make screwing the US in trade to survive. Trump told them that tariffs were coming soon to equalize the playing field. Trudeau panicked and and resigned. Trump does not want Canada
dale74 · M
@TexChik did you notice how just a few days after Trudeau met with Trump he all the sudden decided he was going to resign.
TexChik · F
@dale74 yep!
wildbill83 · 41-45, M
for what we've spent on Ukraine, we oughta own it by now... 🤔
@wildbill83 And yet it's Zelenskyy that's playing puppet master with BinBiden and the UN, as well as NATO.
dale74 · M
First of all would you misunderstand is an annexation must be approved up by the people being annexed not just the country that would be annexing. There are rules to an annexation and it would have to be put as a popular vote by Canadians and by Americans before it could actually go through it would have to both past the popular vote in both countries as well as the senate in Congress or the house of Commons or whatever Canada calls their Parliament
@dale74 #whataboutism
dale74 · M
@BohemianBabe "Projecting your own insecurities onto others" is called psychological projection in psychology; it refers to a defense mechanism where someone unconsciously attributes their own thoughts, feelings, and traits onto other people, often as a way to avoid confronting their own vulnerabilities.
Key points about projection:
Defense mechanism: Projection is considered a defense mechanism used to manage uncomfortable emotions by assigning them to others instead of acknowledging them within oneself.
Unconscious behavior: People often project unconsciously, not realizing they are doing it.
Example: Someone who is very insecure about their appearance might constantly accuse others of being vain or self-centered.
@dale74 So is that what you're doing when you pretend it's actually the Democrats who are against democracy?
Cierzo · M
China rejoining Taiwan, and Falklands being given back to Argentina is justice, not annexation.
BigGuy2 · 31-35, M
@Cierzo 🤔 ... oh really, or is it Spain that MAY have a claim over them:

In 1774, the British settlement was withdrawn, but British sovereignty was not abandoned. In 1816, Argentina declared its independence from Spain and asserted its authority over the Falklands as the successor state to Spain.


Argentina MAY assert authority IF Spain had ceased to exist ... 🤔 has it 🤷🏼‍♂🤷🏼‍♂🤷🏼‍♂

'Sovereignty' ... usually implies Legal ownership - {as outlined in my example/information}
Cierzo · M
@BigGuy2 No 😂. Falklands for Argentina. Spain just claims Gibraltar.
BigGuy2 · 31-35, M
@Cierzo 🙄🙄🙄 i see FACTS are giving YOU a MELTDOWN after just one interaction

😎😎😎
MasterLee · 56-60, M
I see zero advantage to owning Canada. It is a tax dumping ground.
MrSmooTh · 31-35, M
It's about time we had a WW3. I think everybody is sick of eachother. Let's do this thing.
@MrSmooTh The Canadians have had it too good for too long!
@MrSmooTh Will you be participating?
Sidewinder · 36-40, M
Nobody should be allowed to go to war.

AND I MEAN NOBODY!!!
@Sidewinder Young men die because of old men's squabbles.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
You mean the same thing that has been going on since colonization began. LOL.
graphite · 61-69, M
This is a way for the USA to win Olympic Gold in hockey in perpetuity.
zonavar68 · 56-60, M
"The spreading wildfire of northward expansion"...
Lilymoon · F
Well said 💯
If they couldn't even blockade tiny West Berlin into starvation, I think the 2nd biggest country in the world would find a way to eat
BigGuy2 · 31-35, M
Conclusion: ... that CLOWN Trudeau was a whip'n boy for the Globalists and the WEF ... remember Shwab ... "you will have nothing, but you'll be happy" ... controlled by US

... that is attached to him

🤔 ... i'm guessing Trump will ignore Canada {easily done} now that Trudeau's gone, so the real reason he's said what he's said was ... 🤷🏼‍♂🤷🏼‍♂🤷🏼‍♂
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
If anyone actually thinks Trump is actually serious about annexing Canada, I have a bridge to sell.

cc: @beermeplease
@newjaninev2 Just wait it out, we'll see how it all plays out.
@NativePortlander1970 says
If anyone actually thinks Trump is actually serious about
And every time another Tяump promise fails to deliver, that'll be the refrain - he wasn't serious about that one either🤣😂

In 2016, Tяump
* Promised a tax cut that pays for itself;
* Promised to replace Obamacare with something better and cheaper that covers everyone;
* Promised a trillion dollars worth of infrastructure spending;
* Promised "We're going to see economic growth of 4, 5 & maybe 6%!";
* Promised to reduce deficit and eventually balance the budget;
* Promised to reduce prices of prescription drugs;
* Promised he had made the world safe from Kim Jong Un's missiles;
* Promised to LOCK HER UP!
* Promised to make Mexico pay for that wall;
* Promised to release his tax returns;
* Promised to cut the number of tax brackets, repeal the alternative minimum tax,eliminate the carried interest loophole, and allow individuals to deduct health care insurance premiums from taxes.

That's several trillion dollars worth of major promises Tяump "wasn't serious about" LOL!!
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@NativePortlander1970 Another thing we don't have to take serious? ... that's really professional from a guy that wants to be the president of a big country. Good job putting him into office.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment

 
Post Comment