Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Trump’s Canada Fantasy: How Annexation Talk Could Spark World War 3"


The Domino Effect of Expansionism:
If the U.S. ever seriously tried to annex Canada, it would send a loud and clear message to the world: "Screw sovereignty, the strong do what they want." And trust me, that’s a Pandora’s box nobody wants to open. Once that door is cracked, every power-hungry nation on the planet would start eyeing their neighbors like a buffet. Here’s how it could play out:

China and Taiwan: China’s been drooling over Taiwan for decades, calling it a "breakaway province" while Taiwan thrives as its own independent thing. If the U.S. grabs Canada, you can bet China will speed up its plans to snatch Taiwan—probably with tanks, jets, and a whole lot of chaos.

Russia and Beyond: Putin’s already knee-deep in Ukraine, but if expansionism becomes the new normal, why stop there? Georgia, Moldova, maybe even Poland—anywhere the old Soviet flag once flew could be back on the menu.

Everyone Else: India and Pakistan over Kashmir? Israel and Palestine? Argentina and the UK over the Falklands? Forget diplomacy—why talk when you can just take? The world would turn into a free-for-all, with every country grabbing whatever land they can.

And here’s the kicker: Trump says he won’t use military force, but he’s mentioned using economic plans to strong-arm Canada into annexation. Think tariffs, trade wars, and economic pressure designed to force Canada’s hand. It’s like saying, "I won’t punch you, but I’ll starve you until you give me what I want." That’s not just aggressive—it’s a blueprint for other nations to follow. If the U.S. can use economic coercion to annex Canada, what’s stopping China from doing the same to Taiwan or Russia to Eastern Europe?

Erosion of International Norms:
The whole world runs on one basic rule: Nations have the right to exist without getting stomped by their neighbors. But if the U.S. throws that rule out the window, it’s game over for global stability. Here’s what happens next:

Back to Imperialism: Remember when empires like Britain and France just took whatever they wanted? Yeah, that could make a comeback. Powerful nations would carve up weaker ones like it’s the 1800s all over again.

Alliances Fall Apart: NATO? The UN? The EU? Forget about it. These organizations only work if everyone agrees to play by the rules. If the U.S. starts breaking them, the whole system collapses.

Arms Race 2.0: Every country would start building up their military, not for defense, but for conquest. It’s like a high-stakes game of Risk, except with real nukes and real consequences.

Risk of World War:
Let’s be real: if multiple countries start grabbing land at the same time, it’s not going to end well. Here’s why:

Alliances and Entanglements: Countries are tied together by defense treaties. If China invades Taiwan, the U.S. might jump in, dragging in Japan, Australia, and half of NATO. If Russia goes after Poland, NATO has to respond. Before you know it, it’s not just a regional conflict—it’s World War III.

Nuclear Nightmare: The U.S., China, and Russia all have enough nukes to turn the planet into a smoking crater. If things get out of hand, someone’s going to push the button. And once that happens, it’s game over for everyone.

Economic Meltdown: Global trade would grind to a halt. Supply chains? Gone. Food and fuel? Good luck finding any. The modern world runs on cooperation, and war would blow that to pieces.

Why This Scenario is Unlikely (But Still Dangerous):
Okay, let’s be honest: the U.S. annexing Canada is about as likely as pigs flying. But here’s the problem—when someone like Trump throws around these ideas, even as a joke, it makes other leaders think, "Hey, if they can do it, why can’t we?" And that’s how you get chaos. Even if it’s just talk, it plants the seed for disaster.

The Importance of Diplomacy and International Cooperation:
So, how do we stop this madness? It’s simple: play by the rules.

Strengthen International Institutions: The UN, NATO, and other organizations need to step up and keep everyone in check. No more letting bullies run the playground.

Promote Diplomacy: Talk it out. Negotiate. Compromise. War should always be the last resort, not the first option.

Reject Expansionist Rhetoric: Leaders need to stop throwing around dangerous ideas, even if they’re just trying to sound tough. Words have consequences, and in this case, the consequences could be catastrophic.

Conclusion:
The idea of the U.S. annexing Canada might sound like a bad joke, but it’s a reminder of how fragile the world really is. If powerful nations start grabbing land—whether by force, economic pressure, or sheer intimidation—it’s not just Canada or Taiwan or Ukraine that’s at risk. It’s the entire global order. And let’s be real: nobody wins in a world war. The cost is too high, the stakes are too big, and the fallout would last for generations.

So, instead of dreaming about empire-building, let’s focus on keeping the peace. Because at the end of the day, a stable world is a hell of a lot better than a smoking crater.

Final Note:
"I am not a politician, and this article does not intend to promote any particular political agenda or spread hate. My goal is simply to raise awareness about the potential dangers of expansionist rhetoric and policies. I believe that open and honest discussions about these critical issues are crucial for preventing potential disasters and ensuring a peaceful and prosperous future for all."
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
dale74 · M
First of all would you misunderstand is an annexation must be approved up by the people being annexed not just the country that would be annexing. There are rules to an annexation and it would have to be put as a popular vote by Canadians and by Americans before it could actually go through it would have to both past the popular vote in both countries as well as the senate in Congress or the house of Commons or whatever Canada calls their Parliament
@dale74
First of all would you misunderstand is an annexation must be approved up by the people being annexed not just the country that would be annexing.

Neither the Nazis nor the Bolsheviks asked Poland if it was cool to annex them.

TBH, I'd be fine with Canada becoming an American state if there was a vote and the majority of Canadians voted to join. But these are Republicans we're talking about, they reject democracy.
dale74 · M
@BohemianBabe it was never called annexing in the war don't get your panties in a wad but if it wasn't voting on by the people of Canada and the United States and approved by both it would not happen.
@dale74
it was never called annexing in the war

First, yes it was. The Nazis' annexation of Western Poland is largely considered to be the beginning of WWII. It was used by Britain and France to justify declaring war on Germany.

Secondly, who cares? Even if nobody used the word "annexing" to describe what Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union did, it was still annexation.

don't get your panties in a wad

The panties I wear aren't granny panties, so they don't get in a wad.

if it wasn't voting on by the people of Canada and the United States and approved by both it would not happen.

Why not? The Trump Cult opposes democracy. Why would they not do something because of a vote?
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
@dale74 #whataboutism
dale74 · M
@BohemianBabe "Projecting your own insecurities onto others" is called psychological projection in psychology; it refers to a defense mechanism where someone unconsciously attributes their own thoughts, feelings, and traits onto other people, often as a way to avoid confronting their own vulnerabilities.
Key points about projection:
Defense mechanism: Projection is considered a defense mechanism used to manage uncomfortable emotions by assigning them to others instead of acknowledging them within oneself.
Unconscious behavior: People often project unconsciously, not realizing they are doing it.
Example: Someone who is very insecure about their appearance might constantly accuse others of being vain or self-centered.
@dale74 So is that what you're doing when you pretend it's actually the Democrats who are against democracy?