Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

So how much would it cost to remove the fluoride from the water that has it naturally?

Damn these morons are idiots.
Piper · 61-69, F
A staggering amount of money, I'm almost sure. If that is what RFK Jr actually meant, I agree it is not at all a reasonable or 'good' proposition...which would not of be course be at all surprising, coming from him.
Not adding industrial waste grade fluoride to potable water supplies, however, would only be a financial burden for the wealthy, powerful companies that produce it.

I have several reasons for opposing that practice, and none of them are any of the "conspiracy" theories I've been hearing since the late 70's.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
Not as much as it would cost to remove the blue kool-aid from your bloodstream
Vin53 · M
@sunsporter1649 Fluoride is present in all water sources at concentrations ranging from minimally detectible to
greater than 10 parts per million (ppm). The fluoride level in rivers and lakes (surface water)
varies widely, reflecting rainwater contact with windblown soils and other elements in the
environment. Well water (groundwater) fluoride levels vary depending on the minerals in the
rock and ores that the water passes over. Fluoride in ocean water is typically in the range of
1.2 to 1.4 ppm. Water sources with high fluoride concentrations
have been found in many parts of the world, including in the
US.
1,2 A small percentage of U.S. community water systems have drinking water that
naturally exceeds 2 ppm of fluoride and a smaller percentage have water that exceeds 4
ppm.

You really never fail to prove what an absolute idiot you are do you.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
VisionQuest · 51-55, M
@sunsporter1649 Aren't you a cute little trumpanzee!
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
So what benefit do you see to putting fluoride in drinking water?
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@trollslayer I don't think anyone is talking about removing natural mineralisation. People are talking about the fluoride being put in drinking water because they think there is a health benefit.
trollslayer · 46-50, M
@hippyjoe1955 so if it is bad, then the natural needs to be removed, too. If it isn’t bad, why force local communities who voted to supplement their water to change?
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@trollslayer https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6195894/#:~:text=Initially%2C%20fluoride%20was%20considered%20beneficial,dental%20caries%20and%20tooth%20decay.
HumanEarth · 56-60, F
These are the people that pretend to run countries. They are nothing more then highly paid sheep
VisionQuest · 51-55, M
I'm sure RFK has all the answers!
This comment is hidden. Show Comment

 
Post Comment