Who will win? Let the facts speak for themselves.

@sree251 But there aren't as many of them.

@LeopoldBloom
Mysterious comment. You have nothing to say?

@luckranger71 But wait! What?? "come back crying fraud" is the WHOLE game plan🤣😂🤣😂

@ElwoodBlues

@Diotrephes
The role of SCOTUS is to review cases. A US citizen can take Congress to court for violation of the Constitution. If SCOTUS rule against Congress, the decision can not only curb Congress but also open the way for further limitation of power of the legislative branch of the US Government.

@sree251
Please read the federal Constitution. Congress can control the cases the SCOTUS can review unless such cases are specifically mentioned in the Constitution.

Article III
Section 1 Section 2 Section 3

Section 1

The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.


Section 2

The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;—to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public ministers and Consuls;—to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;—to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;—to Controversies between two or more States;—between a State and Citizens of another State;—between Citizens of different States;—between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.


In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.


The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed.


Section 3

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
https://www.senate.gov/about/origins-foundations/senate-and-constitution/constitution.htm

"Unlike the Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction,1 Article III provides that the Court’s appellate jurisdiction is subject to Exceptions and Regulations prescribed by Congress.2 Congress and the Court have construed this provision, sometimes called the Exceptions Clause, to grant Congress significant control over the Court’s appellate jurisdiction and proceedings. In addition, Congress possesses extensive authority to regulate the jurisdiction of the lower federal courts, and may limit the cases the Supreme Court can hear on appeal by generally stripping the federal courts of jurisdiction over certain cases."
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artIII-S2-C2-6/ALDE_00013618/#:~:text=In%20addition%2C%20Congr

@Diotrephes
Don't read the Constitution. It's a legal document best read by constitutional lawyers.

We are discussing the US Government. It is comprised of three branches: 1. Executive Branch (enforces laws), 2. Legislative Branch (make laws), and 3. Judicial Branch (interpret laws).


SCOTUS review cases submitted to it by any party. It's sole function is to interpret laws and decide if they are consistent with the provision and intent of the Constitution. SCOTUS is the final authority. There is no appeal against SCOTUS decision.

@ElwoodBlues
Don't you think the betting houses of the world have considered all factors before they came up with the odds? They are putting money where their mouths are.

According to the SportsOddsHistory archive, you have to go back to 1976, when President Jimmy Carter won over Gerald Ford, for the last time betting odds called the election the wrong way—and even then, Carter's odds were only slightly better than Ford's at +100.

@sree251 The betting odds are parimutuel. They automatically adjust as more bets are made to guarantee the house will always take a profit. Thus they represent the betting population, which may not reflect the voting population.

Since betting is a primarily male activity, the odds won't reflect if tRump has a woman problem. See the examples, below; betting odds are a very imperfect tool.

BTW, according to OddsShark, at 8:01 PM on election night, Nov 2016, Hillary was -900, tRump was +550.

UPDATE
Also see https://www.benzinga.com/news/20/11/18206213/how-the-betting-odds-for-trump-biden-fluctuated-on-election-night
There was apparently a period of 2020 election night when the betting odds of tRump winning were 88.5%

@LeopoldBloom I still don't see how betting sites can be a predictor when the majority of bets are placed by people who cannot vote in the election (e.g., Elon Musk)

@Mesthartiya
Elon Musk can vote. He is an American.

@Vin53 Not only that, but those WSJ numbers don't include INDEPENDENT registrations. Given that independents usually swing elections, that's kind of a significant oversight, wouldn't you say??

Perhaps another case of reporting a misleading partial truth??

@rocknroll Thank you for proving my point. North Carolina is a swing state in this election, and it isn't surprising based on its recent voting history.

@windinhishair not a swing state at all

@rocknroll Maybe North carilina is not, but North Carolina is.