Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Trump Explains Why He Told Crowd They Won’t Have To Vote, And Makes It Sound Worse

Former President Donald Trump attempted to explain what he meant when he told a crowd of Christians last Friday that, as far as voting goes, they wouldn’t “have to do it anymore” if he wins in November.

Trump spoke to Fox News host Laura Ingraham on Monday amid criticism about his remarks, which Democrats say is further evidence that he would attempt to stay in office beyond a second term. Opponents have pointed to other remarks in which he pledged to only be a dictator on “day one” of a new term and vowed to retaliate against his critics if he returns to the White House.

Ingraham afforded Trump multiple attempts to reject Democrats’ claims that he was telling supporters they wouldn’t need to vote again in the future, but Trump reiterated that Christians wouldn’t have to vote for him multiple times.

“This was a crowd that liked me a lot ... and they’re treated very badly by this administration, OK?” Trump said of his speech Friday at the faith-focused event in Florida.

“That statement is very simple,” he added. “I said, vote for me; you’re not going to have to do it ever again. It’s true.”

“This time vote, I’ll straighten out the country, you won’t have to vote anymore, I won’t need your vote.”

“You meant you won’t have to vote for you because you’ll have four years in office,” Ingraham pressed.

“I’m saying go out, you must vote,” Trump replied. “I said to the Christians in the room … you have to vote on Nov. 5. After that, you don’t have to worry about voting anymore — I don’t care — because we’re going to fix up, the country will be fixed and we won’t even need your vote anymore because frankly we will have such love.”

The former president added that Christians and gun owners were the key groups he was trying to appeal to, claiming they “don’t vote.” He also repeated his claim that Jewish Americans who vote for a Democrat “should have your head examined.”
Top | New | Old
luckranger71 · 51-55, M
He’s very weird.
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@luckranger71 no, he is evil.
luckranger71 · 51-55, M
@samueltyler2 That too
bookerdana · M
@samueltyler2 Hes both..hes wevil
Piper · 61-69, F
He definitely didn't make it sound any better. The implication is as chillingly clear as ever.
The trick is, do you agree with what his vision of "fixed" is....

The question is, "is donald a threat to the US Constitution", AND the answer is......
@VeronicaJane trump is a threat to the whole world,
badminton · 61-69, MVIP
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
Ann Coulter said this years ago:

This comment is hidden. Show Comment
SW-User
Not surprising she’d carry his water, given her tendency to prevaricate when faced with a popular argument, rather than, you know, confer it using actual concrete evidence:

This comment is hidden. Show Comment
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@SW-User Dont ever expect a Right winger to tell the truth or at least the whole truth. You only need to look at the commentary here. Full of obfustication and things they read somewhere.😷
trollslayer · 46-50, M
@SW-User seems she is making the case *for* loan forgiveness.
SW-User
This is putting lipstick on a pig. We ALL heard what he said. We have heard him say before he should not have just two terms. We have all heard him talk about "dictator for a day".. we have all heard him say if he loses and is in office he will not transfer power to the winner.

None of that needs explanation. We know EXACTLY what he means when he said vote for me this once and you won't ever vote again. If you read Project 2025 it calls for the end of elections. If trump says he didn't mean that...................and he WILL NOT say he didn't mean just that..........he's a liar,
TrashCat · M
@SW-User Trump was a big mistake. Now we're going to correct this for good
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@SW-User He just named "Google" as a business he didnt like ans would look at shutting down. Lets not get into the illegality and unconstitutional nature of all that...This is "Man in the High Castle" stuff.😷
The explanation is even worse.
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
Like I said. He's going to replace all the unelected federal employees with Trump appointed MAGA loyalists who will prevent any legislation the Heritage Foundation doesn't approve from being passed ever again.

That's his plan. He has flat out said so.
Convivial · 26-30, F
There's only one head that needs examining here...
Tastyfrzz · 61-69, M
He is a domestic terrorist and needs to be treated as such.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@Tastyfrzz Hes actually worse than that. But the systems to contain a despot like him have failed..😷
SW-User
Trump sounds more derranged by the day.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Northwest · M
@whowasthatmaskedman These people are going to vote for him. They're enabling the guy who will make them irrelevant.

Sort of like "LGBTQ for Hamas", or "Freedom Of Choice For Maduro".

 
Post Comment