Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Demand Justice Launches $10M Campaign for Supreme Court Reform

Democrats now want to commit Treason against the Supreme court.

A progressive judicial advocacy group plans to launch a $10 million campaign to push for reforms at the Supreme Court, Politico reported.

Demand Justice aims to advocate for ethics reforms at the Supreme Court and mobilize groups affected by the court's decisions, like women and young people, Politico reported. The organization wants to make the Supreme Court a key voter issue in the 2024 election.

"Our democracy is in an absolute crisis, and the Supreme Court majority is accelerating it," Skye Perryman, Demand Justice's new senior adviser, told Politico.

The organization's campaign comes after the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that presidents have "absolute" immunity for official acts but no immunity for unofficial acts.

"We have a court that is not protecting our democratic institutions," Perryman said.

The group has been pushing for the Supreme Court to be expanded since Republicans blocked the nomination of Merrick Garland in 2016. Their efforts have largely been met with resistance from Democrats.

Now Demand Justice is hoping to counterweight the Federalist Society, a conservative judicial advocacy group that was influential in former President Donald Trump's three appointments to the Supreme Court.

"We want the American people to know is that our Constitution, even in this crisis, provides the tools for people to be able to fight back," Perryman told Politico.

Potential reforms include creating an independent ethics office, internal investigations council, increasing the number of seats on the court, or limiting justices to 18-year terms, Politico said.

While similar bills have been introduced in Congress, none have gained any traction. Last month, Senate Republicans recently blocked a bill creating a binding code of conduct for the court.
Confined · 56-60, M
Dem Lawmakers Plot Retaliation Against High Court

Democrats Plotting Treason!!!


Two high profile Democratic lawmakers have called for retaliatory measures against the U.S. Supreme Court following Monday’s decision on presidential immunity.

On Monday the court ruled in a 6-3 decision that former presidents have immunity from prosecution for official acts. Writing for the majority opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that a president “is entitled to at least presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts. There is no immunity for unofficial acts."

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., posted on X on Tuesday that President Joe Biden should pack the court to ensure that her version of democracy is maintained.

“Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell stole two seats on the Supreme Court, and we’re living with the consequences. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: It’s time to expand the court,” she wrote Tuesday.

Not to be outdone, Rep. Alexandira Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., has called for the justices she disapproves of to be removed completely to prevent the rise of a dictatorship.

“The Supreme Court has become consumed by a corruption crisis beyond its control. Today’s ruling represents an assault on American democracy. It is up to Congress to defend our nation from this authoritarian capture. I intend on filing articles of impeachment upon our return,” she posted.
Confined · 56-60, M
I find it shocking how many people have no idea what the United States Constituion says. There was no reason the supreme court should of had to rule on it.
The said the president has a job to do. You cant throw him in jail for doing his job.
No where does it say he can muder some one and not be charged. Those of you who think that a president can kill a political rival you need to get a grip. Its all propoganda. Please take a civics class.
I was required to have a civics class in school. We had to memorize the preamble, and all amendments.
Confined · 56-60, M
The democrats are not even trying to cover up the treason they are plotting.
James25 · 61-69, M
Yes the Supreme Court needs to be reformed. Certain justices need to be removed. The Supreme Court is corrupt
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@James25 Especially the justice that does not know what a woman is
Confined · 56-60, M
@James25 The liberal justices should go. Other wise they made the right call with immunity.
That is why we have an odd amount of justices. They are the final word on all arguments. That is their job.
Jennster · 18-21, F
sounds like freedom of speech and political advocacy… what’s wrong with that?
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Jennster Sure, folks are free to make clowns of themselves all they want
Jennster · 18-21, F
@sunsporter1649 yeah so it’s not ‘treason’ it’s just American values
James25 · 61-69, M
And even greater question is how are you confined? Are you in prison? Are you under house arrest?
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
More left-wing nut-job bridge salsemen at work. 😂
James25 · 61-69, M
Potential reforms include creating an independent ethics office, internal investigations council, increasing the number of seats on the court, or limiting justices to 18-year terms, Politico said

I agree these would be great reforms
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment

 
Post Comment