“It was 60 years ago Wednesday!”
Poll - Total Votes: 22
The Lone Gunman Theory
All indications point to a massive plot in Dallas
You can only vote on one answer.
Top | Newest First | Oldest First
goodlil666 · 51-55, M
@graphite The last time Oswald was was tested in the Marines his shooting score was barely enough to qualify. Several different independent studies done with recreating the shooting angel , distance , type of rifle and ammo used on a moving target , etc, etc, by highly trained marksmen failed to achieve the same results. I also stated little training with the type of surplus military weapon he supposedly used. The bullet that was found just laying on the gurney shows very little deformation after passing through all the flesh and bone it was supposed to. Another layered point of travel , flight ,impact and time sequence computer study with over a million pins in thousands of layers was overlayed over the Zapruder film in the late 20 teens and they failed to match up.
You really buy that a mobster took it on himself to take out Oswald ?? You really buy that some of the highest trained law enforcement agents in the world would clean and remove evidence from the crime scene of a Presidential assassination with out photographing or preserving the scene ( the limo) ? Much of the" evidence" that is listed in the WCR, has been reevaluated in recent years and they have found issues with a lot of it.
You really buy that a mobster took it on himself to take out Oswald ?? You really buy that some of the highest trained law enforcement agents in the world would clean and remove evidence from the crime scene of a Presidential assassination with out photographing or preserving the scene ( the limo) ? Much of the" evidence" that is listed in the WCR, has been reevaluated in recent years and they have found issues with a lot of it.
View 2 more replies »
goodlil666 · 51-55, M
@graphite Skip the navigation22 November 1963An Introduction to the JFK Assassination
HomeDid Oswald Kill President Kennedy?Was Oswald Framed?The VerdictFurther ReadingOther TextsThe Book
You are here: Home › Further Reading › JFK Assassination FAQs › Was Oswald an Expert Marksman?
Go straight to: Search | Main Navigation
Was Oswald an Expert Marksman?
SummaryLee Oswald qualified as a sharpshooter in the Marines in 1956, but his skill deteriorated and by the time he left the Marines, more than four years before the assassination, he was officially 'a rather poor shot'.
HomeDid Oswald Kill President Kennedy?Was Oswald Framed?The VerdictFurther ReadingOther TextsThe Book
You are here: Home › Further Reading › JFK Assassination FAQs › Was Oswald an Expert Marksman?
Go straight to: Search | Main Navigation
Was Oswald an Expert Marksman?
SummaryLee Oswald qualified as a sharpshooter in the Marines in 1956, but his skill deteriorated and by the time he left the Marines, more than four years before the assassination, he was officially 'a rather poor shot'.
graphite · 61-69, M
@goodlil666 Then who else was involved? 60 years of conspiracy theorists eagerly hunting down the "killers," nobody else ever found but Oswald, the wife-beating, full-of-himself loser. Even his own brother never questioned his guilt. "There is no question in my mind that Lee was responsible for the three shots fired, two of the shots hitting the president and killing him." - Robert Oswald, a guy in the know with every reason on Earth to want to absolve his brother. But facts are stubborn things.
goodlil666 · 51-55, M
@graphite Yes, I agree they are. And there are to many " facts" that are just a bit to antiseptic and convenient. But there are questions that go unanswered and or swept under the rug as well. His trip to Mexico city just weeks before the assassination has never really been explained. He is known to have visited the Russian consulate in Mexico city whose two top directors were known KGB operatives as well.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
bookerdana · M
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
ElwoodBlues · M
I've never seen any evidence of any massive plot. AND.
It really seems like Oswald was intentionally silenced when Jack Ruby shot him in the midst of a crowd of cops next to a police station.
I still can't reconcile the apparent lone gunman with the apparent silencing of Oswald. So I have to leave it an open question.
It really seems like Oswald was intentionally silenced when Jack Ruby shot him in the midst of a crowd of cops next to a police station.
I still can't reconcile the apparent lone gunman with the apparent silencing of Oswald. So I have to leave it an open question.
JohnnyNoir · 56-60, M
SteelHands · 61-69, M
goodlil666 · 51-55, M
@graphite All the evidence they prepared and chose to share with the public. It's ludicrous to believe Oswald, with little training using a surplus military rifle known for NOT being particularly accurate was capable let alone able to make those shots at that distance in that amount of time. Several of the best marksmen in the world have tried to repeat that feat and failed. Don't believe everything you read, especially if it is from the government.
graphite · 61-69, M
@goodlil666 Little training? He was a well-trained marine sharpshooter. And other experts have found it to be a make-able shot. Who are these marksmen you're talking about? JFK, with serious back issues, had a back brace on that kept him propped up after the first shot hit him. Otherwise he might have slumped over so the head shot would've missed. Gerald Posner, in his book. "Case Closed," says to absolve Oswald is to protect a man with blood on his hands and mock the president he killed.
Muthafukajones · 46-50, M
graphite · 61-69, M
@Muthafukajones Oswald would be 84 if still alive, but if he'd gone to trial, he'd have gotten the Timothy McVeigh treatment in short order - execution by the federal government.
Roundandroundwego · 61-69
MLK, JFK, RFK, Malcolm X, Medger Evers, and no dead right wing leaders
Roundandroundwego · 61-69
@NativePortlander Nixon was a leftist compared to Bill Clinton. At least Nixon gave all the hyphenated Americans our hyphens.
NativePortlander · 51-55
Roundandroundwego · 61-69
@NativePortlander I think peace and life are impossible because you so funny. You so Murkan.
specman · 51-55, M
We only know the evidence of the situation that the government wants us to know. The government was dirty like the one nowadays.
graphite · 61-69, M
@specman The government, especially now, is filthy. But all the evidence points right at wife-beating pathetic communist loser Oswald. Did he have the will, the skill, and the opportunity to pull this off? The answer to all 3 questions is yes. FWIW, when Oswald went to the USSR, which didn't even want him and wanted to throw him out until he tried to kill himself, the KGB's conclusion was Oswald was too pathetic to be any kind of US government operative.
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
Cry-Baby-trump said it was Ted Cruz's father who was involved.
Bumbles · 51-55, M
No actual direct evidence Oswald didn’t act alone. Just sayin…
JSul3 · 70-79
Never forget: Gerald Ford was on the Warren Commission.
NativePortlander · 51-55
I find it odd that Kennedy was about to pull the Special Forces advisors out of Vietnam and tell Van Mihn he was on his own, but with Texas having the most military industrial complex contracts, and Lyndon Johnson being both from Texas, and Kennedy's Veep, doesn't anyone find it suspicious that Kennedy was taken out in Dallas, [b][u]Texas[/u][/b]?
NativePortlander · 51-55
@graphite Now that I have gotten you to admit that you have accepted the official government report on JFK, you will believe anything the establishment tells you, that all of your past posts, comments, and replies, regarding BinBiden, and the left, is nothing more than bullshit, nothing you ever say or write in the future is to be believed or taken seriously, you are a fraud.
graphite · 61-69, M
@NativePortlander Just look at the evidence. All of it points to Oswald doing this all on his own. The corrupt Biden administration is a completely different matter. Are you saying, Biden is a crook therefore Oswald was innocent? Read "Case Closed," by Gerald Posner. The book sent conspiracy theorists into fits of rage, because it really questioned their religion of "There was a conspiracy to kill JFK. Just take our word for it, sans any actual evidence."
NativePortlander · 51-55
@graphite LOL Once again you are taking the word of government propaganda, who gives a flying fuck which establishment shill wrote what, "evidence" is always manipulated.
18,428 people following
Politics Personal Stories, Advice, and Support![]()
New Post Associated Forums Topic Members
Politics Personal Stories, Advice, and Support
