Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

“It was 60 years ago Wednesday!”

Poll - Total Votes: 22
The Lone Gunman Theory
All indications point to a massive plot in Dallas
Show Results
You can only vote on one answer.
I don’t have time to read all the volumes of the Warren Commission.

So…🤔

Answering with one of the following only….

Oswald.

Yup?

Or

Nup?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
graphite · 61-69, M
All the evidence points right at Oswald. All of it. Case Closed.
@graphite Read my own comment
goodlil666 · 51-55, M
@graphite All the evidence they prepared and chose to share with the public. It's ludicrous to believe Oswald, with little training using a surplus military rifle known for NOT being particularly accurate was capable let alone able to make those shots at that distance in that amount of time. Several of the best marksmen in the world have tried to repeat that feat and failed. Don't believe everything you read, especially if it is from the government.
graphite · 61-69, M
@goodlil666 Little training? He was a well-trained marine sharpshooter. And other experts have found it to be a make-able shot. Who are these marksmen you're talking about? JFK, with serious back issues, had a back brace on that kept him propped up after the first shot hit him. Otherwise he might have slumped over so the head shot would've missed. Gerald Posner, in his book. "Case Closed," says to absolve Oswald is to protect a man with blood on his hands and mock the president he killed.
SW-User
@goodlil666 I've been to the shooter's perch. Shot couldn't be more makeable. 70 yards at most