Relax and enjoy the good life you have. This isn’t something people my age have to worry about We will be long gone before any of this happens if it ever does happen
@GJOFJ3 speak up, tell more people that have no idea what’s going on, there’s more of us than them. More protests, unit instead of dividing which is what they want.
@GJOFJ3 Use your voice on social media. Attend peaceful protests. The globalists are counting on complacency and defeatism. Many are asleep. Others have been thoroughly brainwashed. Be an alarm clock
@BizSuitStacy There are no protests to attend, all I see is some anonymous people posting about this on social media. Some of the same people that posted about the millions and millions of people who were going to die within a year of getting the Covid jab. I’m going to enjoy the life the good lord has provided and leave all the big worries for Him to work out
Do your really imagine that all 200+ governments plus a clergyman and a computer-programmer, can really co-operate to such an extent that they could create any such thing?
That the hard-line Communist states, and the Russian Federation, are going to work on this with the "West"?
That the Islamic theocracies, who oppose other faiths and despise the USA, are going to help a Christian priest and an American businessman build such a hair-brained scheme?
Let alone that both types of dictatorship, both inimical to humanity and democracy, would want to encourage the UN, which upholds human rights?
The UN does not have the strength and certainly no desire to be a [i]de facto[/i] dictator over the whole world.
Even the EU, which is probably the worlds' largest single [i]bloc[/i] by number of member-states, only just manages itself, with a lot of disagreement and disaffection. And that's only about 26 countries of overlapping, fundamentally democratic, systems and societies.
Anyway, we Britons are already on two national lists: our National Insurance and our National Health Service, numbers. Not to mention all the numbers on the schemes we choose to have, like driving-licence, utility-accounts and bank-accounts.
So Gates thinks a television a 'basic service'? Hardly! It's a luxury not a need. I choose to have no TV, and so do many others including at least two of my own friends. (I receive my News and current-affairs, plus other knowledge and entertainments, via the radio.) Surely clean water and sewerage are far more 'basic services' than TV, which is primarily for entertainment.
Like it says itself, wherever it is from, "... internet ramblings".
@ArishMell I think the main thing that stops you being open to universal movements is that you consider each of the individuals as nothing more than that: fanciful folks, imagining great things, but imagining them alone, folks whose success may have gone a little to their heads, and given them illusions of grandeur as they lie on their beds at night and plan vast schemes they have no hope of realising...
Hence, for you, the pope is a wishful little prelate, with a tiny say over a few thousand churches and a few million people who are really not interested in him at all ... Gates is a successful businessman who would love to initiate more schemes but has to content himself with selflessly giving away his money to the poor...
This is so far from reality, that I fear your awakening will be rude when it comes.
By the way, don't shoot the messenger! Read the message!
@WalterF I did read the message. I know you did not write it, but I wonder who did and why.
It may well be anonymous, but it does clearly accuse all manner of people and organisations of hatching some plot so far-fetched by simple logic that it has no credibility.
I know perfectly well the Pope is revered by millions of Catholics, but to non-Catholics, especially followers of other faiths, he is someone to be respected but is not especially important to them.
Similarly, Bill Gates is an extremely wealthy businessman: but so what? I do not like his company's sales methods and monopoly, but for reasons unconnected with any "world government" allegation.
Digital ID is an important foundation for the technological hellscape that the parasites have/are implementing.
There are some positive signs that many are aware of this at some level. Look at how government "crypto" is being rejected in the countries it has been trialled in and the conversations i have are much more fruitful than say covid. Unfortunately, it will be enacted by force if not consented to. Thats when most will buckle.......but fingers crossed more will be willing to stand up against this
@GJOFJ3 @ArishMell The argument of faceless anonymous people posting ramblings on social media [b][b][i]fails [/i][/b][/b]when their "ramblings" are backed up by explicit descriptions of the plan [b]FROM THE BIG PLAYERS THEMSELVES. [/b]
Alongside quotes from the UN (the horse's mouth?), the article in this post gives three links which implicate the corporate world, governments, and banks.
For your convenience, here they are, live:
Corporate:Working Group Solutions [b]https://www.scribd.com/document/333127274/Fortune-Time-Global-Forum-2016-Working-Group-Solutions[/b]
Governments (United Nations):ID2020—Concept for Public/Private Partnership [b]https://id2020.org/[/b]
Banks:UFA2020 Universal Financial Access 2020,[u]WEF Blueprint for Financial Identity[/u] [b]https://www.weforum.org/reports/disruptive-innovation-in-financial-services-a-blueprint-for-digital/[/b]
@WalterF Who actually wrote what you posted, though?
All these plans still rely on international co-operation to levels that so far have never happened, and frankly have little chance of happening in an increasingly fractured and fractious world.
The fight against Covid did show signs of such co-operation being possible, but too many countries messed that up by turning the disease into a party-political matter or excuse for international slander. Yet that was a relatively simple, common-enemy situation.
The idea of making everyone citizens of some world-wide super-nation may seem attractive to a few schemers and dreamers, and is a popular theme in futurist fiction; but it is just too far in need, desire, complexity and co-operation to be serious.
As for your references, [b]id202's[/b] own, sleek web-site shows it a think-tank of major businesses who'd profit from any such scheme. Since at least some if not all are American, I can't see their ideas being popular among the many lands who despise the USA and all its stands for.
The [b]scribd.com[/b] lot: again, a bunch mainly of business directors, academics, priests and trades-union leaders.
As for WEF... we all know you would not trust that fancy talking-shop of high-falutin' bank-clerks and politicians as far as you could throw it.
All ideas by people with nowt better to do than invent them. Not concrete, governmental or UN policies.
In any case, whilst I oppose any sort of gratuitous ID system for no demonstrable purpose, such as they have in Germany and many other countries, we already need prove who we are to be able to draw our money from our banks - but that is to protect our assets!
