@GJOFJ3 @ArishMell The argument of faceless anonymous people posting ramblings on social media [b]fails [/b]when their "ramblings" are backed up by explicit descriptions of the plan FROM THE BIG PLAYERS THEMSELVES.
Alongside quotes from the UN (the horse's mouth?), the article in this post gives three links which implicate the corporate world, governments, and banks.
For your convenience, here they are, live:
Corporate:Working Group Solutions https://www.scribd.com/document/333127274/Fortune-Time-Global-Forum-2016-Working-Group-Solutions
Governments (United Nations):ID2020—Concept for Public/Private Partnership https://id2020.org/
Banks:UFA2020 Universal Financial Access 2020,WEF Blueprint for Financial Identity https://www.weforum.org/reports/disruptive-innovation-in-financial-services-a-blueprint-for-digital/
@WalterF Who actually wrote what you posted, though?
All these plans still rely on international co-operation to levels that so far have never happened, and frankly have little chance of happening in an increasingly fractured and fractious world.
The fight against Covid did show signs of such co-operation being possible, but too many countries messed that up by turning the disease into a party-political matter or excuse for international slander. Yet that was a relatively simple, common-enemy situation.
The idea of making everyone citizens of some world-wide super-nation may seem attractive to a few schemers and dreamers, and is a popular theme in futurist fiction; but it is just too far in need, desire, complexity and co-operation to be serious.
As for your references, id202's own, sleek web-site shows it a think-tank of major businesses who'd profit from any such scheme. Since at least some if not all are American, I can't see their ideas being popular among the many lands who despise the USA and all its stands for.
The scribd.com lot: again, a bunch mainly of business directors, academics, priests and trades-union leaders.
As for WEF... we all know you would not trust that fancy talking-shop of high-falutin' bank-clerks and politicians as far as you could throw it.
All ideas by people with nowt better to do than invent them. Not concrete, governmental or UN policies.
In any case, whilst I oppose any sort of gratuitous ID system for no demonstrable purpose, such as they have in Germany and many other countries, we already need prove who we are to be able to draw our money from our banks - but that is to protect our assets!
