BREAKING: AG Merrick Garland Names Former Hague Prosecutor Jack Smith as Special Counsel to Investigate Trump for Jan 6. and Mar-a-Lago Documents
Oh oh.
It’s getting very real now,
It’s getting very real now,
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
ron122 · 41-45, M
OMG!!!! HAHAHAHA🤣You will never learn little man.🤣
@ron122 Fox News legal analyst Jonathan Turley argued “there are real risks here for the former president” upon news that Attorney General Merrick Garland was appointing a special counsel to oversee probes into Donald Trump.
“It’s really Mar-a-Lago that I would be most worried about if I were on the Trump team and that team may have to change,” Turley argued, noting that while the newly appointed special counsel, Jack Smith, will probe both Trump’s involvement in the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol and his retention of documents from the White House – the latter is where he sees real legal danger for Trump.
“It’s really Mar-a-Lago that I would be most worried about if I were on the Trump team and that team may have to change,” Turley argued, noting that while the newly appointed special counsel, Jack Smith, will probe both Trump’s involvement in the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol and his retention of documents from the White House – the latter is where he sees real legal danger for Trump.
@ron122 “I would note one more thing, John, and that is you wouldn’t have appointed a special counsel unless they felt that there was a there there. I mean, Garland clearly believes that there’s a potential for criminal charges,” Turley explained, concluding:
That’s why most of us are looking at Mar-a-Lago as the focus here. That is not good news for Donald Trump or the Trump team. They can’t count on this thing going beyond 2024. This is a much, as I said, more narrow and concrete set of facts than what Mueller was dealing with in the Russian collusion investigation.
That’s why most of us are looking at Mar-a-Lago as the focus here. That is not good news for Donald Trump or the Trump team. They can’t count on this thing going beyond 2024. This is a much, as I said, more narrow and concrete set of facts than what Mueller was dealing with in the Russian collusion investigation.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@sunsporter1649 You’re talking about the constitutional expert that Republicans use all the time Jonathan Turley. Those are the words that I copied and pasted.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Ryderbike So? Let that "constitutional expert" debate Mark Levin on meritless garlands latest bullschiff
@sunsporter1649 Turley is who the republicans use all the time.
He was the one they called during the impeachment to help trump .
You’re not well informed are you?
He was the one they called during the impeachment to help trump .
You’re not well informed are you?