Top | Newest First | Oldest First
IFoundLife · 41-45, F
Pfuzylogic · M
smiler2012 · 56-60
{@spotpot} they say you can be a good christian attend church but how an earth can they ever endorse putins actions . what hypocrisy from this man pretends on one hand he is a christian then sanctions the butchering of the innocent . putin is more the work of the devil than christ
SomeMichGuy · M
Let's look at the facts.
1) Russia signed an agreement to NOT attack Ukraine in exchange for Ukraine giving up its nuclear weapons.
[c=BF0000][b]RUSSIA HAS VIOLATED THIS AGREEMENT.[/b][/c]
2) Putin not only ILLEGALLY started the war, he has also specifically gone after civilian targets--hospitals, schools, daycare, apartment complexes.
3) Power stations might well be fair game, but their treament of "Europe's" largest nuclear power plant is disturbingly and dangerously cavalier, and it's clear that he wants to seize THAT, as well (free power for Mother Russia?).
4) Putin's fit of pique after having the only bridge to Crimea blown up resulted in a PEDESTRIAN bridge being blown up.
5) Putin has used long-range missiles, weaponized drones, and now a veiled threat of nuclear weapons as ever-more-desperate attempts to gain ground.
6) Putin displayed vast hubris when he seemed to think Ukraine would fall over perhaps a long weekend.
7) Putin has had negotiators lie about cease-fires and has NEVER honored the agreed-upon terms.
Do these sound like the characteristics of Christ? The attitude of Christ?
These are the actions of a lying breaker of sober international obligations.
1) Russia signed an agreement to NOT attack Ukraine in exchange for Ukraine giving up its nuclear weapons.
[c=BF0000][b]RUSSIA HAS VIOLATED THIS AGREEMENT.[/b][/c]
2) Putin not only ILLEGALLY started the war, he has also specifically gone after civilian targets--hospitals, schools, daycare, apartment complexes.
3) Power stations might well be fair game, but their treament of "Europe's" largest nuclear power plant is disturbingly and dangerously cavalier, and it's clear that he wants to seize THAT, as well (free power for Mother Russia?).
4) Putin's fit of pique after having the only bridge to Crimea blown up resulted in a PEDESTRIAN bridge being blown up.
5) Putin has used long-range missiles, weaponized drones, and now a veiled threat of nuclear weapons as ever-more-desperate attempts to gain ground.
6) Putin displayed vast hubris when he seemed to think Ukraine would fall over perhaps a long weekend.
7) Putin has had negotiators lie about cease-fires and has NEVER honored the agreed-upon terms.
Do these sound like the characteristics of Christ? The attitude of Christ?
These are the actions of a lying breaker of sober international obligations.
CommandLine · 56-60, M
TallMtnMedic · M
Actually war for wars sake is a no. To stop evil, then yes.
Question though, how is Putin on the side of good, how is their enemy?
Who's the agressor, who started it and why really?
Ukraine didn't start it, and no one human rights were being denied or eliminated. They were in independent country, and wanted to remain so, Putin didnt want that and thought itd be over in less than a week.
Question though, how is Putin on the side of good, how is their enemy?
Who's the agressor, who started it and why really?
Ukraine didn't start it, and no one human rights were being denied or eliminated. They were in independent country, and wanted to remain so, Putin didnt want that and thought itd be over in less than a week.
Justmeraeagain · 56-60, F
SomeMichGuy · M
@Convivial Wage, and you are centuries out of date.
TheOneyouwerewarnedabout · 41-45, MVIP
It would Be over if that dimwit would stop sending billions of dollars to a cokehead…
This aged well huh?
I didn’t even know about FTX then.
And now congress is republican …
What a coincidence.. the moneys stopped and now zelinskeyy wants peace negotiations….
You don’t say 😒
Tell me more how republicans are pushing wars…
This aged well huh?
I didn’t even know about FTX then.
And now congress is republican …
What a coincidence.. the moneys stopped and now zelinskeyy wants peace negotiations….
You don’t say 😒
Tell me more how republicans are pushing wars…
Dshhh · M
Christians by nature, should never support war.
View 1 more replies »
easterniowegin · 51-55, M
Hate the sin, love the sinner.
Applies to a lot more than just some leader a half a world away!!
Applies to a lot more than just some leader a half a world away!!
Roundandroundwego · 61-69
Christian people support NATO, so yeah, war is good, now.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
ImperialAerosolKidFromEP · 46-50, M
Irrelevant. I don't support his war, but I don't see what stops someone from being a Christian if they do
SomeMichGuy · M
@ImperialAerosolKidFromEP Then you don't care if someone supports leaders who violate his claimed core values...meaning that the claimed core values...aren't.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment