Top | Newest First | Oldest First
Budwick · 70-79, M
the liberals must re-think their desire to ban guns - with strong conflict with the Bill of Rights.
View 5 more replies »
SW-User
You sound like a busy man@Budwick
windinhishair · 61-69, M
By all means, let's go back to the past. People can use single-shot rifles to kill their own food, and meet the Second Amendment requirement of bearing the same arms so they can form a well-regulated militia when needed. Assault rifles and other multiple shot weapons can be banned, since they will not be needed in a hunter-gatherer society.
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
@windinhishair We already have a perfectly well organized militia. It's called the army.
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@LordShadowfire Yes, we do.
@LordShadowfire you don’t know your history very well do you? The whole purpose of the militia was the founders did not want to have a standing army. They were totally against having a military.
justanothername · 51-55, M
Republicans back to making shit up … again.
I didn’t know that you needed a semi automatic rifle to hunt for food. I thought that semi automatic rifles were just for mass killings.
The “right to bare arms” has nothing to do with hunting for food. The right to bare arms is about self defense against an armed intruder.
I didn’t know that you needed a semi automatic rifle to hunt for food. I thought that semi automatic rifles were just for mass killings.
The “right to bare arms” has nothing to do with hunting for food. The right to bare arms is about self defense against an armed intruder.
RedBaron · M
@justanothername The right to BARE arms only allows us to wear short sleeve shirts. I think you mean the right to BEAR arms. 😂
justanothername · 51-55, M
@RedBaron either way you don’t need a semi automatic to hunt.
FlowersNButterflies · 61-69, FVIP
You don't understand inflation and international economics. TRump loves the poorly educated..
Thevy29 · 41-45, M
That is a good idea, all you gun nuts in the bush with those high powered assault rifles that people want to ban. What could go wrong?
TexChik · F
They did by want you to eat . They want you to die.
cherokeepatti · 61-69, F
@TexChik If you read the story of how Ukraine was taken over by Commies they passed one law after another to starve the people. Made the farmer’s pay taxes, and would come back each month for more taxes or part of their stored grain and food. They made it against the law to hunt, or fish or catch any kind of wild animals to eat. They also would go out to the farms and prod haystacks to see if food was stored in them and go all over the farm looking to see if they could find buried cache’s of foods. If the people were not dead yet they would have taken a bite of food out of their mouths. The motive was to get the farmers to hand over their farms to the state. And upwards to 10 million people died in that famine.
TexChik · F
@cherokeepatti The reason that doesn’t happen here is the 2A
justanothername · 51-55, M
If anyone is worried about having enough deer to shoot for food you can come and visit us. We have plenty of wild deer running around in our forested areas that need to be culled.
As long as you are a licensed firearms owner you can come and visit.
As long as you are a licensed firearms owner you can come and visit.
1490wayb · 56-60, M
@justanothername i have deer, fox, and occasional bear walk down my street on edge of town
justanothername · 51-55, M
@1490wayb we don’t have fox or bear just too many deer.
Roundandroundwego · 61-69
Liberals cannot vote to do anything. Americans accept rule by brute force.
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
FlowersNButterflies · 61-69, FVIP
@Roundandroundwego No.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
robingoodfellow · M
@LordShadowfire nobody wants to ban hunting rifles. But since they're the guns most Americans own, creating the illusion that they'll be banned is a way the gun lobbyists and gun crazies keep people angry and unsupportive of any gun legislation at all.
The way I look it:
Own hunting rifles, you're a hunter.
Own a handgun, you like the security it provides.
Own any kind of assault rifle or gun designed to
kill maximum people in a minimum time frame,
you like the feeling of power it gives you and it should't be in your hands.
Really need one of those? Join the military where you can put it to it's intended use.
The way I look it:
Own hunting rifles, you're a hunter.
Own a handgun, you like the security it provides.
Own any kind of assault rifle or gun designed to
kill maximum people in a minimum time frame,
you like the feeling of power it gives you and it should't be in your hands.
Really need one of those? Join the military where you can put it to it's intended use.
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
@robingoodfellow I know, right? We have a perfectly constitutionally adequate militia, run by people who keep the weapons out of the hands of the crazies while training people who want to defend our country on how to use them safely. But that's not good enough for the second amendment fetishists. 🤷♀️