The Republicans posting on this site are extremely poor at reasoning and highly skilled at deceiving. It's a mob scene. A diseased cult. Herd mentality. 🙄
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
@lumberjackslam I agree that everyone who committed violence or caused damage at a protests should be prosecuted. There is a practical difficulty though. As a rule the folks at the BLM protests did not bother to take photos and videos of their illegal activities and post them to social media.
Why did the Trumpsters ignore all common sense and fully document their illegal activities? Perhaps they thought they had been promised a pardon beforehand; I don't really know. But the fact remains that the Jan 6 insurrectionists made themselves irresistibly easy to prosecute.
@ElwoodBlues You fucking moron. There is tons of video of antifa, BLM and other protestors looting, burning, attacking bystanders etc. It's just been buried, pushed off Youtube and forced out of the mainstream.
@SumKindaMunster Photos & videos where you can identify the people? I didn't think I needed to mention that you have to be able to identify the people in the photos and videos to prosecute; I assumed anyone but a fucking moron would be able to realize that, [b]LOL!!![/b]
@SumKindaMunster Regarding mob violence: [quote]An analysis of more than 7,750 demonstrations in 2,400 locations across the country found that 93% happened with no violence, according to the US Crisis Monitor, a joint effort by Princeton University and the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project. [/quote] [b]https://acleddata.com/2020/09/03/demonstrations-political-violence-in-america-new-data-for-summer-2020/[/b]
@ElwoodBlues Moving the goal post huh? My response was to your asinine comment that there is no video evidence of crimes committed by BLM and Antifa. There is plenty. I gave you an example, should you care to research further. 😆
[quote]An analysis of more than 7,750 demonstrations in 2,400 locations across the country found that 93% happened with no violence, according to the US Crisis Monitor, a joint effort by Princeton University and the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project.[/quote]
Please note, my comment is not to give you the impression that I am taking this study at face value...
So the other 7%? When are they going to be investigated and charged for their crimes?
@SumKindaMunster "research further" lol. 77th brigade/narrative pushers aint interested in that 😉. They just want your attention and to whip up division
@SumKindaMunster [quote]Moving the goal post huh?[/quote] Nope. My post was about video and photo evidence that can be used for prosecution. If you want to always take the silliest possible interpretation, that's your problem.
[quote]So the other 7%? When are they going to be investigated and charged for their crimes?[/quote] That's at 7% of protests, not 7% of the people. When? When prosecutable evidence becomes available. See above. Now go ahead and find some silly way to misinterpret this.
@gol979 I've been saying the same thing about prosecuting all violence. I've been saying it for months! That's why you can't identify any of these alleged contradictions, LOL!!!
@SumKindaMunster let elwood preach to his ever shrinking echo chamber....."he" is an energy sapper. I was falling for it on a consistent basis. Dunno why im telling you what to do lol. Just advice i suppose
@gol979 [quote] let elwood preach to his ever shrinking echo chamber[/quote] Translation: you can't refute the facts and data I provide, so instead you're falling back on personal attacks, [b]LOL!!![/b]
@ElwoodBlues This is what I was contradicting moron, and yes you did say this for I took the quote directly from your post.
[quote]As a rule the folks at the BLM protests did not bother to take photos and videos of their illegal activities and post them to social media.[/quote]
DUUUDE!!! You're still searching for a way to misinterpret what I said; to find some little irrelevant corner you can contradict, so you can do your little victory dance. [b] SAD!!![/b]
@ElwoodBlues Not at all, I was merely correcting your misinterpretation and refuting your strawman argument.
I'm not interested in your definition of what winning or losing means. I don't care how you choose to interpret our interaction.
I thought it important that I refute your nonsense about the reasons why the Feds went after the 1/6 rioters and let BLM and Antifa run wild and I did that.
The rest is your childish snark and desperate loneliness for human contact.
@SumKindaMunster Whine all you like. Despite your distant video with shadowy silhouettes, the fact remains that the Jan 6 insurrectionists handed their asses to prosecuters on a silver platter and the BLM folks did no such thing. You can spend your days picking nits about my phrasing & word choice, but you can't alter the facts.
@SumKindaMunster I've gone out of my way to say that not everybody involved in Jan. 6 was a 'terrorist', even to people I knew didn't want to hear it.
There were tons of people that were lingering outside of the capitol building who recognized it was wrong to break in and riot. I've seen videos of protestors asking the capitol police to send in reinforcements because they sensed something bad was going to come of it.
That said, the people that chose to loot, destroy property, bring firearms and zip ties, assault police, and seek out congress members to maim and harass deserve to be behind bars. It's one thing to protest and make your voice heard, and quite another to attempt to subvert democracy and enforce your political beliefs through violence and intimidation.