Fun
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Karine Jean-Pierre: ‘Unconstitutional’ For Supreme Court To Overturn Roe

In other words, in KJP’s upside-down bizarro-world, it was “unconstitutional” for the Supreme Court to perform its constitutional duty. Got it?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Would it kill you to provide a source?
https://www.foxnews.com/media/karine-jean-pierre-roasted-calling-overturning-roe-wade-unconstitutional
Thinkerbell · 41-45, F
@MistyCee

Try as I might, I couldn't find a reference to Jean-Pierre's idiotic statement in the WashPo or the NY Times.

I guess that news wasn't fit to print...? 🤔

[media=https://youtu.be/XukLE5MW7QU]

@Thinkerbell Why else would I cite Faux news?
Thinkerbell · 41-45, F
@MistyCee

Because they were among the few who didn't hide Jean-Pierre's idiocy...?
@Thinkerbell Lol, or because I suspected OP might be full of original bullshit.
@Thinkerbell
Maybe it's only newsworthy if you think calling a decision which takes away women's rights over their own body unconstitutional is "idiotic" lol

Why am i not surprised that you consider fox news ( the station that had to legally declare that one of their anchorman's words should not legally be considered news) to be a good source😆

Write a me a limerick about it or ill ignore your response.
Thinkerbell · 41-45, F
@MistyCee

[quote]"Lol, or because I suspected OP might be full of original bullshit."[/quote]

And as usual, you were wrong. 😂
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Pikachu Got all 32 of your kung flu shots?
@Thinkerbell And I'm fine with my suspicions were wrong.
Thinkerbell · 41-45, F
@Pikachu

[quote]"Write a me a limerick about it or ill ignore your response."[/quote]

I always aim to please.
If Karine weren't such an utter fool, the NY Times would gladly feature her on their front page.
But she would be too much of embarrassment for that. 😂 😂 😂
@Thinkerbell

Ooof.😆 lol ok...we [i]both[/i] know that one was weak, right?
I was with you until
"Had a dime's
worth of brains..."

Additionally, you failed to respond to my criticism, only repeat your own.

We'll call that draft one.
Try again😉
Thinkerbell · 41-45, F
@Pikachu

I [i]did[/i] respond, only you were too dense to understand.

So, specifically:

[quote]"Maybe it's only newsworthy if you think calling a decision which takes away women's rights over their own body unconstitutional is "idiotic" lol"[/quote]

The Times could have made a big deal over your alleged point, had they thought Jean-Pierre expressed it well.

But of course they didn't.
Because she didn't.

It would have been too embarrassing, even for the Times.
They probably wish Psaki hadn't quit. 😂 😂 😂
@Thinkerbell

lol gosh you [i]do[/i] get techy when your poetry is criticized🤣

[quote]The Times could have made a big deal over your alleged point, had they thought Jean-Pierre expressed it well.
[/quote]

Um...ok? Let's say that's true.
So in addition to not thinking it was a newsworthy sentiment, they also didn't think she expressed it in a newsworthy way... And?
lol did you think that was some sort of scathing criticism?
You're a bit of an odd duck, aren't you, Tink?🙂

I think maybe if you didn't get so caught up in your own tribalism you would be happier.
Just sayin...
Thinkerbell · 41-45, F
@Pikachu

[quote]"lol did you think that was some sort of scathing criticism?"[/quote]

No, the Times would [i]never[/i] criticize Jean-Pierre. 😂
So they simply didn't cover her foolish statement; no matter what their slant,
mentioning it at all would have been too embarrassing. 😂 😂

[quote]"I think maybe if you didn't get so caught up in your own tribalism you would be happier.
Just sayin..."[/quote]

...says the unhappy left-wing tribalist. 😂 😂 😂
@Thinkerbell

lol Oh my that's a lot of 😂[i]'s[/i]...overcompensating a little, perhaps?

[quote]it at all would have been too embarrassing[/quote]

Well you're certainly entitled to your opinion. I maintain that her statement was simply not contentious enough in the estimation of many people to be considered newsworthy.

[quote]...says the unhappy left-wing tribalist.[/quote]

Oh Tink....when you find yourself reduced to [i]"I know you are but what am iiii?!"[/i] then maybe it's time to pack it in, hmm?
Reflect on how many times i call people idiotic and crazy or any other combination of petty insults for believing differently than i do vs how often you, yourself engage in that behaviour🙂✌️

Yeah....
Thinkerbell · 41-45, F
@Pikachu

No dice Piksie; you botched it yet again. 😂 😂 😂

@Thinkerbell

[i]Much[/i] better than your first poem👏👏👏

But it's plain that you resort to shallow verse when you find yourself unable to make a thoughtful rebuttal.
I'm sure it distracts and fools some people but you'll have to do better than that with me.
...
Or to put in the framework you've exemplified: No YUR the bad one!😂😂😂

You're not a stupid person, i can tell. Don't behave this way please.