Karine Jean-Pierre: ‘Unconstitutional’ For Supreme Court To Overturn Roe
In other words, in KJP’s upside-down bizarro-world, it was “unconstitutional” for the Supreme Court to perform its constitutional duty. Got it?
70-79, M
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
@Thinkerbell
Maybe it's only newsworthy if you think calling a decision which takes away women's rights over their own body unconstitutional is "idiotic" lol
Why am i not surprised that you consider fox news ( the station that had to legally declare that one of their anchorman's words should not legally be considered news) to be a good source😆
Write a me a limerick about it or ill ignore your response.
Maybe it's only newsworthy if you think calling a decision which takes away women's rights over their own body unconstitutional is "idiotic" lol
Why am i not surprised that you consider fox news ( the station that had to legally declare that one of their anchorman's words should not legally be considered news) to be a good source😆
Write a me a limerick about it or ill ignore your response.
@Thinkerbell
Ooof.😆 lol ok...we both know that one was weak, right?
I was with you until
"Had a dime's
worth of brains..."
Additionally, you failed to respond to my criticism, only repeat your own.
We'll call that draft one.
Try again😉
Ooof.😆 lol ok...we both know that one was weak, right?
I was with you until
"Had a dime's
worth of brains..."
Additionally, you failed to respond to my criticism, only repeat your own.
We'll call that draft one.
Try again😉
Thinkerbell · 41-45, F
@Pikachu
I did respond, only you were too dense to understand.
So, specifically:
The Times could have made a big deal over your alleged point, had they thought Jean-Pierre expressed it well.
But of course they didn't.
Because she didn't.
It would have been too embarrassing, even for the Times.
They probably wish Psaki hadn't quit. 😂 😂 😂
I did respond, only you were too dense to understand.
So, specifically:
"Maybe it's only newsworthy if you think calling a decision which takes away women's rights over their own body unconstitutional is "idiotic" lol"
The Times could have made a big deal over your alleged point, had they thought Jean-Pierre expressed it well.
But of course they didn't.
Because she didn't.
It would have been too embarrassing, even for the Times.
They probably wish Psaki hadn't quit. 😂 😂 😂
@Thinkerbell
lol gosh you do get techy when your poetry is criticized🤣
Um...ok? Let's say that's true.
So in addition to not thinking it was a newsworthy sentiment, they also didn't think she expressed it in a newsworthy way... And?
lol did you think that was some sort of scathing criticism?
You're a bit of an odd duck, aren't you, Tink?🙂
I think maybe if you didn't get so caught up in your own tribalism you would be happier.
Just sayin...
lol gosh you do get techy when your poetry is criticized🤣
The Times could have made a big deal over your alleged point, had they thought Jean-Pierre expressed it well.
Um...ok? Let's say that's true.
So in addition to not thinking it was a newsworthy sentiment, they also didn't think she expressed it in a newsworthy way... And?
lol did you think that was some sort of scathing criticism?
You're a bit of an odd duck, aren't you, Tink?🙂
I think maybe if you didn't get so caught up in your own tribalism you would be happier.
Just sayin...
Thinkerbell · 41-45, F
@Pikachu
No, the Times would never criticize Jean-Pierre. 😂
So they simply didn't cover her foolish statement; no matter what their slant,
mentioning it at all would have been too embarrassing. 😂 😂
...says the unhappy left-wing tribalist. 😂 😂 😂
"lol did you think that was some sort of scathing criticism?"
No, the Times would never criticize Jean-Pierre. 😂
So they simply didn't cover her foolish statement; no matter what their slant,
mentioning it at all would have been too embarrassing. 😂 😂
"I think maybe if you didn't get so caught up in your own tribalism you would be happier.
Just sayin..."
Just sayin..."
...says the unhappy left-wing tribalist. 😂 😂 😂
@Thinkerbell
lol Oh my that's a lot of 😂's...overcompensating a little, perhaps?
Well you're certainly entitled to your opinion. I maintain that her statement was simply not contentious enough in the estimation of many people to be considered newsworthy.
Oh Tink....when you find yourself reduced to "I know you are but what am iiii?!" then maybe it's time to pack it in, hmm?
Reflect on how many times i call people idiotic and crazy or any other combination of petty insults for believing differently than i do vs how often you, yourself engage in that behaviour🙂✌️
Yeah....
lol Oh my that's a lot of 😂's...overcompensating a little, perhaps?
it at all would have been too embarrassing
Well you're certainly entitled to your opinion. I maintain that her statement was simply not contentious enough in the estimation of many people to be considered newsworthy.
...says the unhappy left-wing tribalist.
Oh Tink....when you find yourself reduced to "I know you are but what am iiii?!" then maybe it's time to pack it in, hmm?
Reflect on how many times i call people idiotic and crazy or any other combination of petty insults for believing differently than i do vs how often you, yourself engage in that behaviour🙂✌️
Yeah....
Thinkerbell · 41-45, F
@Thinkerbell
Much better than your first poem👏👏👏
But it's plain that you resort to shallow verse when you find yourself unable to make a thoughtful rebuttal.
I'm sure it distracts and fools some people but you'll have to do better than that with me.
...
Or to put in the framework you've exemplified: No YUR the bad one!😂😂😂
You're not a stupid person, i can tell. Don't behave this way please.
Much better than your first poem👏👏👏
But it's plain that you resort to shallow verse when you find yourself unable to make a thoughtful rebuttal.
I'm sure it distracts and fools some people but you'll have to do better than that with me.
...
Or to put in the framework you've exemplified: No YUR the bad one!😂😂😂
You're not a stupid person, i can tell. Don't behave this way please.