Politics & News

Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Lyin' Liz Appears on Fox With Bret Baier and Spews More BS

Liz Cheney is flat out misleading the public. Listen very carefully to the words she uses in reference to Chris Miller's testimony. Then listen to what Chris Miller had to say on the matter back in June, when on Hannity. Anyone who has followed this story closely knows Trump pre-authorized up to 20,000 National Guard troops on Jan 4th, and Miller testified to that fact. The Speaker of the House (Nancy Pelosi) and DC Mayor (Muriel Bowser) have to request the troops in order for them to be deployed. They never did. The POTUS does not simply issue the order to deploy the Guard.

Kash Patel has reached out to Fox and Bret Baier to set the record straight. They have not responded to Patel.

[media=https://youtu.be/ZUaMFh1-sZo]

Top | Newest First | Oldest First

TheOneyouwerewarnedabout · 46-50, MVIP

BizSuitStacy · M

@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout

4meAndyou · F

I sort of thought everybody KNEW Trump authorized the troops and Pelosi chose not to use them. She WANTED a riot. She and Bowser didn't even arm the capitol police. Their riot gear was parked in vans away from the capitol.

BizSuitStacy · M

@4meAndyou I thought so too. And there is a difference between authorizing something and ordering it.

MarineBob · 56-60, M

she's worse than her Daddy

BizSuitStacy · M

@MarineBob And that's not an easy accomplishment.

TexChik · F

The left has glossed over any evidence that is contrary to their narrative. Its a show trial and the defendant isnt allowed to speak or defend themselves. They are guilty because the left said so. Much like the Russia collusion investigation and impeachment. Everyone on the left knew it was a lie and spent millions of tax dollars and told thousands of lies to do anything to get Trump out of office.

View 2 more replies »

carpediem · 61-69, M

@TexChik I hope you're right. We'll see what Garland does. If they time it right, they'll wrap him up in nonsense at the exact right time. The appeals court can come later. It's all about keeping Trump down.

TexChik · F

@carpediem It doesnt matter what Garland does, After the midterms Biden and the libs ensconced in the fed wont have the power they do now. And the precedent will only mean Hillary and Obama are up next because they committed actual crimes that have evidence, not claims and hearsay.

carpediem · 61-69, M

@TexChik Any of that comes true and it's cocktails for everyone. And I'm buying.

Carissimi · F

I can’t listen to these shameless liars.

carpediem · 61-69, M

The hate is strong in that one. The same with that punk from Illinois. In fact, he’s such an idiot he thought getting in their good graces was a career move. LOL. They gerrymandered his district away. LMAO.

You can’t even make that shit up.

PTCdresser57 · 61-69, M

The problem I see is in the Media Miller said Trump authorized troops but under oath he testified no order was given from Trump. So which is it? What he said in the media carries no "perjury" penalty but under oath it does carry a perjury penalty.

View 6 more replies »

MistyCee

@BizSuitStacy So Trump can preauthorize without issuing "an order to get ready?"

How are these 10k or 20k folks going to know to get ready without an order?

BizSuitStacy · M

@MistyCee Do you understand the difference between issuing an order and an authorizating a request? Or are we going to continue in circles here?

This comment is hidden. Show Comment

MistyCee

Nice post, and I'm not being sarcastic, because you presented it really well.

This foreign threat, that he can't tell Hannity about is probably the elephant in the room at this point, but Miller's "testimony" and the repackaging of it seems to be suspect on "both sides."

Patel, on the other hand, is pure political trash, and and I'm not surprised that Baier and Fox haven't "responded" to him.

My take on this, from my sofa, obviously, is that Trump probably didn't know how to "preauthorize" troops, and by this point, everyone had gotten exhausted by his "management style."

Skipping Cheney, who apparently wasn't involved, you've done a good job of at least asking Pelosi for an explanation and clarification on whether and how this "offer" might have been communicated to her.

BizSuitStacy · M

@MistyCee The crux is authorize v order. There is a difference here, and that's what will have both sides pointing fingers. They've asked Pelosi and she's said she didn't want NG presence because of optics. And yes...I do believe there is something more here with respect to a foreign or national security threat. Much more. But I've only seen peripheral information thus far.

wildbill83 · 41-45, M

I'm more concerned about the fact that they're wasting all this time and effort on these idiotic witch trials when they could be doing something more productive and beneficial to the country

like committing suicide... 🤔

Add a comment...