Do conservatives have to live with human rights that they don't like?

@Msharsh that's not true. Bleeding to death? No right to any help? Bull.

@Stopmakingsense Yeah screw those peasants, who do they think they are? The rats 😇

@Msharsh Then you don't have any right to use the police or fire departments since they're socialist, better yet, don't put anything into social security because you'd be a hypocrite otherwise.

The postal service is also out of the question, as is any student loan or grant that you have previously put out and not paid back.

Also yeah.. pretty much don't use any public service at all because you have no right to their fruits of labor. This means when you want 911, you should stop and ask how selfish you're really being as you have no right.

[b]https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2012/3/29/1078852/-75-Ways-Socialism-Has-Improved-America[/b]

@PrivateHell like the rights to immigration, housing, medical care voting and education? Individual rights.

@Stopmakingsense None of those are rights here. Try living on the real world

@SW-User rights are privileges is a false statement which merely looking up the words meanings clearly demonstrates

@Msharsh yes, a false statement attributed to fascists.

@SatanBurger That's who makes up the UN. Especially their ironically named Human Rights Council

@Slade So the UN doesn't want free healthcare for people?

@SatanBurger I Don't know or care what they want. They are irrelevant. And virtually always anti Americam

@Msharsh No.

[quote]Due to the program's open and accessible design and its allowance of unverified reports, incomplete VAERS data is often used in false claims regarding vaccine safety. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control has warned that data from VAERS is not enough to determine whether a vaccine can cause a particular adverse event.[14]

[b]There has been a surge in reports to VAERS during the COVID-19 pandemic, which has led to the data being used in COVID-19 vaccine-related misinformation.[14] In fact, analytics of VAERS data using proportional reporting reveals that the vaccine is not associated with a higher risk of anaphylaxis,[15] autoimmune side effects[16] or neurological presentations.[17][/b] VAERS data needs appropriate interpretation:

VAERS remains open to reports from individuals, allied healthcare workers and even unrelated third parties. In other words, while there is a risk of unreported AEFIs, there may also be a degree of over-reporting (the same AEFI, for instance, may be reported by the physician, the nurse and the patient as well, without the knowledge of any of the other parties). Moreover, VAERS does not verify the accuracy or veracity of reports, nor does it require a causal attribution. This is notably illustrated by the number of accidents, drownings and congenital diagnoses reported to VAERS, none of which could conceivably be a causal consequence of vaccination. Thus, VAERS data must be appropriately analysed to fulfill its function, which is to generate early potential safety signals rather than to substantiate a causal relationship.

—Chris von Csefalvay, VAERS data reveals no increased risk of neuroautoimmune adverse events from COVID-19 vaccines

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccine_Adverse_Event_Reporting_System#Abuse[/quote]

@SatanBurger spewing the party line

@Msharsh Yeah because the VAERS systems being unverified def. is a party line, you make no sense.

@FullMetalFatPig sure-. Because we can't make the truth matter if conservatives prefer lies!

@Stopmakingsense urban blight comes with joblessness