Do conservatives have to live with human rights that they don't like?

@Msharsh No.

[quote]Due to the program's open and accessible design and its allowance of unverified reports, incomplete VAERS data is often used in false claims regarding vaccine safety. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control has warned that data from VAERS is not enough to determine whether a vaccine can cause a particular adverse event.[14]

[b]There has been a surge in reports to VAERS during the COVID-19 pandemic, which has led to the data being used in COVID-19 vaccine-related misinformation.[14] In fact, analytics of VAERS data using proportional reporting reveals that the vaccine is not associated with a higher risk of anaphylaxis,[15] autoimmune side effects[16] or neurological presentations.[17][/b] VAERS data needs appropriate interpretation:

VAERS remains open to reports from individuals, allied healthcare workers and even unrelated third parties. In other words, while there is a risk of unreported AEFIs, there may also be a degree of over-reporting (the same AEFI, for instance, may be reported by the physician, the nurse and the patient as well, without the knowledge of any of the other parties). Moreover, VAERS does not verify the accuracy or veracity of reports, nor does it require a causal attribution. This is notably illustrated by the number of accidents, drownings and congenital diagnoses reported to VAERS, none of which could conceivably be a causal consequence of vaccination. Thus, VAERS data must be appropriately analysed to fulfill its function, which is to generate early potential safety signals rather than to substantiate a causal relationship.

—Chris von Csefalvay, VAERS data reveals no increased risk of neuroautoimmune adverse events from COVID-19 vaccines

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccine_Adverse_Event_Reporting_System#Abuse[/quote]

@SatanBurger spewing the party line

@Msharsh Yeah because the VAERS systems being unverified def. is a party line, you make no sense.