I's the least bad system so far. As Churchill said, quoting an unknown predecessor:
Many forms of Government have been tried, and will be tried in this world of sin and woe. No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed it has been said that democracy is the worst form of Government except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.…
Define "Democracy". The founders, the Greeks, did not see Democracy as a set of freedoms. But a set of responsibilities to the State. A vote was an obligation to be taken by learned men only after consultation. Freedom was the result.
@QuixoticSoul In a constitutional republic, the head of state is often the head of the executive branch. I wouldn't call that "ceremonial". It's mostly in liberal constitutional constructions that don't have presidents, mostly replaced by traditional institutions like monarchies, that the head of state becomes largely ceremonial. Examples are: Spain, the UK, Belgium, Holland, Luxembourg, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, ... and a bunch of satelite states. In most of the countries this has to do with their historical context. Belgium is a special example, because they were forced to have one, otherwise the powers of Europe wouldn't recongise it's sovereignity.
In these modern liberal constitutional institutions... yes.
@QuixoticSoul Yeah, but isn't Germany more of the exception then the norm? It's easier for me to name republics where the president actually have a hand in the executive then naming republics where that task is done by another function like a chancellor. A couple of big counter examples would be: France, the US, Italy and even Russia.
It works fairly well most of the time.. for many it works really well, for instance if their elections are free from corruption and the person voted in is held to account for their actions. If the person elected understands their position is to act on behalf of their country..
Democracy works just fine for tiny city-state style populations, such as existed in ancient Greece. The larger the population the greater the need for a Republic.
Voting do have impact though these are within a frame created to preserve ruling class interests.
These interests can be challenged and settlements can be changed but unless you are able to create true socialism (no nobody ever has) then the best you can do is fight for a more favourable class compromise. Even that is bloody hard and I've been a small part of a project which tried and failed to do that.
@Fukfacewillie Democracy assumes NO corruption and that it is populated by honest, responsible people. Once you let the money in, it flies out the window.