Top | Newest First | Oldest First
CountScrofula · 41-45, M
Trump is the one who explicitly wrote stuff any moron would know would cause a media firestorm.
You're speaking like this is an engineered scandal, but if it was, it was engineered by Trump.
There's all sorts of things he doesn't want people talking about, including his own ties to Epstein.
Bill Clinton's awfulness does not diminish Trump's.
You're speaking like this is an engineered scandal, but if it was, it was engineered by Trump.
There's all sorts of things he doesn't want people talking about, including his own ties to Epstein.
Bill Clinton's awfulness does not diminish Trump's.
View 4 more replies »
@redredred
Ordinarily, yes. I'd agree that "on the younger side" wouldn't necessarily invoke the idea of pedophilia.
Buuuut in the context of discussing a man who has been running a sex trafficking ring for 12-14 year old girls and who trump had known for 15 years, it does have a pretty pedophilia ring to it.
Context matters.
You know that. You just don't like it.
Now then. Are you going to stop making deflections with implications of projected pedophilia or is honest discourse beneath you?😉
Ordinarily, yes. I'd agree that "on the younger side" wouldn't necessarily invoke the idea of pedophilia.
Buuuut in the context of discussing a man who has been running a sex trafficking ring for 12-14 year old girls and who trump had known for 15 years, it does have a pretty pedophilia ring to it.
Context matters.
You know that. You just don't like it.
Now then. Are you going to stop making deflections with implications of projected pedophilia or is honest discourse beneath you?😉
Northwest · M
It's amusing how these stories get better, every time they're told. Especially when told by people like you, who don't understand what fact checking is, and take deep loads from Fox on regular basis.
So, here's what Fox did, a while back, when it was still run by Ailes (and they have not changed much).
They looked at flight records, for the handful of trips Clinton took on Epstein's jet, to visit African countries, as part of the Clinton Foundation work.
When you count all the landings and takeoff, in those countries, that may (if you stretch it), add up to 26.
On top of that, they ignored the fact that this happened in Africa, and made them all landings in the Virgin Islands.
The fact is, Clinton has never been to Epstein's house. Epstein supposedly threw a part for Clinton, but it was one that Clinton did not show up to. Who did? if you guessed Trump you would be right.
Jesus on a rope!
So, here's what Fox did, a while back, when it was still run by Ailes (and they have not changed much).
They looked at flight records, for the handful of trips Clinton took on Epstein's jet, to visit African countries, as part of the Clinton Foundation work.
When you count all the landings and takeoff, in those countries, that may (if you stretch it), add up to 26.
On top of that, they ignored the fact that this happened in Africa, and made them all landings in the Virgin Islands.
The fact is, Clinton has never been to Epstein's house. Epstein supposedly threw a part for Clinton, but it was one that Clinton did not show up to. Who did? if you guessed Trump you would be right.
Jesus on a rope!
Northwest · M
@GoldenWorm ... or credibility 🤣
MrBrownstone · 46-50, M
@GoldenWorm Or Moron.
Northwest · M
@MrBrownstone I am emphasizing the facts, moron.
Anopenheart · 51-55, M
and the clintons made donald say all those racist things at his rally.. and they made him lead everyone in a "send her home" chant .. yup.. the clintons did all that just to make donald look like a racist even though he isn't.. LOL and they hacked his twitter feed and put all those racist comments on there to ruin his wonderful reputation for being such a kind considered thoughtful intelligent handsome genius
Graylight · 51-55, F
Not a scandal - it's already public knowledge and it in no way detracts from Trump's culpability...with anything.
room101 · 51-55, M
@redredred Oh I see. So, in your trumpist cult-land, not indulging in nonsense whataboutism is synonymous with hypocrisy.
Your opening post is completely deranged and is a clear example of two things. Your hatred for the Clintons (who btw, I couldn't give a rats arse about) and, the classic strategy that all of you trumpettes deploy every time your orange moron says something which shows his woefully defective character ie you deflect attention onto somebody else.
In response to the comment by @Graylight, you asked:
[i]"What culpability? What did he do wrong?"[/i]
I gave you three examples of his wrongdoing, one of which could be deemed as a subjective assessment. The other two are backed up by objective facts which are a matter of public record.
Rather than answer those criticisms, you chose to introduce political personalities. Like that somehow makes his behaviour OK. If that's the case then Clinton is a political personality, why is his behaviour not OK? Answer. Because you're a dishonest hypocrite.
Please take note, that's the first time that I've called you a hypocrite in this discussion. It was @Pikachu who, quite rightly, pointed out your blatant hypocrisy.
I responded by pointing out the flaw in your perspective. You chose to deflect by pretending that you were talking about personality in a general sense. Newsflash. We've all got a personality. Some seek attention more than others and in different ways. A politician should be assessed by the substance of his politics not his friggin' celebrity status.
But the best bit in all of this is you calling for "honest discourse".
Mate, you support trump. A "man" who has empirically and objectively lied an average of nine to ten times every single day of his term in office thus far. Your opening post is dishonest. Pretty much everything that you've said has been dishonest. In short, you wouldn't know "honest discourse" if it came right up to you and slapped you in the face!
Your opening post is completely deranged and is a clear example of two things. Your hatred for the Clintons (who btw, I couldn't give a rats arse about) and, the classic strategy that all of you trumpettes deploy every time your orange moron says something which shows his woefully defective character ie you deflect attention onto somebody else.
In response to the comment by @Graylight, you asked:
[i]"What culpability? What did he do wrong?"[/i]
I gave you three examples of his wrongdoing, one of which could be deemed as a subjective assessment. The other two are backed up by objective facts which are a matter of public record.
Rather than answer those criticisms, you chose to introduce political personalities. Like that somehow makes his behaviour OK. If that's the case then Clinton is a political personality, why is his behaviour not OK? Answer. Because you're a dishonest hypocrite.
Please take note, that's the first time that I've called you a hypocrite in this discussion. It was @Pikachu who, quite rightly, pointed out your blatant hypocrisy.
I responded by pointing out the flaw in your perspective. You chose to deflect by pretending that you were talking about personality in a general sense. Newsflash. We've all got a personality. Some seek attention more than others and in different ways. A politician should be assessed by the substance of his politics not his friggin' celebrity status.
But the best bit in all of this is you calling for "honest discourse".
Mate, you support trump. A "man" who has empirically and objectively lied an average of nine to ten times every single day of his term in office thus far. Your opening post is dishonest. Pretty much everything that you've said has been dishonest. In short, you wouldn't know "honest discourse" if it came right up to you and slapped you in the face!
Graylight · 51-55, F
Nope. Pretty sure it's because he's a racist.
Well Unless you have some alternate information, based on Northwest's post, it seems that you might need to retract that claim....
CopperCicada · M
@Pikachu I find it interesting that everything in DC happens at the whim and for the benefit of the Clintons.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
But Bubba isnt running for re election of the conservative, family values party. Seems its better to be a racist than a child f*cker in America. There is still a line somewhere, which is nice.
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
That’s some advanced Top Mindery lmao 😂
No, Clinton didn’t visit Epstein’s little libertarian hideout 26 times. How fucking gullible are you?
No, Clinton didn’t visit Epstein’s little libertarian hideout 26 times. How fucking gullible are you?
Anopenheart · 51-55, M
i guess the clintons fabricated those videos of donald and epstein as well.. gosh you guys live in a bizarre world of make believe and fake news
That's really not my understanding.
Maybe its just because he's racist
GoldenWorm · 51-55, M
MSM is working with Trump
redredred · M
Sure they are, thats why every news broadcast starts with ten to twenty minutes of Trump bashing@GoldenWorm
softspokenman · M
Without journalism, freedom of speech and freedom of choice, there would be no Democracy, there would be a Dictatorship.
@redredred
@redredred
MrBrownstone · 46-50, M
You are correct. Much like the Vegas shooter went away. How did he get so much ammo and guns in a casino.
MrBrownstone · 46-50, M
@QuixoticSoul You are assuming there are guns in the suitcases. Sorry, I deal in facts.
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@MrBrownstone k
Pherick · 41-45, M
@QuixoticSoul 🤦♂️
SW-User
The more I learn, the less I know. .
Pherick · 41-45, M
Nah, I don't think so.
CopperCicada · M
I thought it was long accepted that Bill Clinton was a sexual degenerate.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
katielass · F
Plus, they have no coherent argument for how he has improved the country.
softspokenman · M
"No one is above the law !" ?
TheOneyouwerewarnedabout · 41-45, MVIP
[image deleted]