This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Graylight · 51-55, F
Not a scandal - it's already public knowledge and it in no way detracts from Trump's culpability...with anything.
room101 · 51-55, M
@redredred Oh I see. So, in your trumpist cult-land, not indulging in nonsense whataboutism is synonymous with hypocrisy.
Your opening post is completely deranged and is a clear example of two things. Your hatred for the Clintons (who btw, I couldn't give a rats arse about) and, the classic strategy that all of you trumpettes deploy every time your orange moron says something which shows his woefully defective character ie you deflect attention onto somebody else.
In response to the comment by @Graylight, you asked:
[i]"What culpability? What did he do wrong?"[/i]
I gave you three examples of his wrongdoing, one of which could be deemed as a subjective assessment. The other two are backed up by objective facts which are a matter of public record.
Rather than answer those criticisms, you chose to introduce political personalities. Like that somehow makes his behaviour OK. If that's the case then Clinton is a political personality, why is his behaviour not OK? Answer. Because you're a dishonest hypocrite.
Please take note, that's the first time that I've called you a hypocrite in this discussion. It was @Pikachu who, quite rightly, pointed out your blatant hypocrisy.
I responded by pointing out the flaw in your perspective. You chose to deflect by pretending that you were talking about personality in a general sense. Newsflash. We've all got a personality. Some seek attention more than others and in different ways. A politician should be assessed by the substance of his politics not his friggin' celebrity status.
But the best bit in all of this is you calling for "honest discourse".
Mate, you support trump. A "man" who has empirically and objectively lied an average of nine to ten times every single day of his term in office thus far. Your opening post is dishonest. Pretty much everything that you've said has been dishonest. In short, you wouldn't know "honest discourse" if it came right up to you and slapped you in the face!
Your opening post is completely deranged and is a clear example of two things. Your hatred for the Clintons (who btw, I couldn't give a rats arse about) and, the classic strategy that all of you trumpettes deploy every time your orange moron says something which shows his woefully defective character ie you deflect attention onto somebody else.
In response to the comment by @Graylight, you asked:
[i]"What culpability? What did he do wrong?"[/i]
I gave you three examples of his wrongdoing, one of which could be deemed as a subjective assessment. The other two are backed up by objective facts which are a matter of public record.
Rather than answer those criticisms, you chose to introduce political personalities. Like that somehow makes his behaviour OK. If that's the case then Clinton is a political personality, why is his behaviour not OK? Answer. Because you're a dishonest hypocrite.
Please take note, that's the first time that I've called you a hypocrite in this discussion. It was @Pikachu who, quite rightly, pointed out your blatant hypocrisy.
I responded by pointing out the flaw in your perspective. You chose to deflect by pretending that you were talking about personality in a general sense. Newsflash. We've all got a personality. Some seek attention more than others and in different ways. A politician should be assessed by the substance of his politics not his friggin' celebrity status.
But the best bit in all of this is you calling for "honest discourse".
Mate, you support trump. A "man" who has empirically and objectively lied an average of nine to ten times every single day of his term in office thus far. Your opening post is dishonest. Pretty much everything that you've said has been dishonest. In short, you wouldn't know "honest discourse" if it came right up to you and slapped you in the face!