TheRealBarbossa · 36-40
I was about to make a comment on behalf of the world, but then I remembered everyone hates generalization.
caPnAhab · 26-30, M
@TheRealBarbossa it was a generalization that inspired this post
GoFish ·
i do
Zaphod42 · 51-55, M
Absolutes are never good.
Unless they are 🤷♂
Unless they are 🤷♂
TheOneyouwerewarnedabout · 46-50, MVIP
youl never be a Sith with that attitud3e..
Theyitis · 36-40, M
Only the Sith deal in absolutes.
Iwillwait · M
Variable Change is inevitable.
ElwoodBlues · M
Speed of light in a vacuum?
Universal gravitational constant?
Rest mass & charge of the electron?
Fine structure constant?
Planck's constant?
These are absolute, regardless of your beliefs.
Universal gravitational constant?
Rest mass & charge of the electron?
Fine structure constant?
Planck's constant?
These are absolute, regardless of your beliefs.
View 2 more replies »
ElwoodBlues · M
@Thinkerbell Actually, the multiverse is used to explain what appears in our universe to be single particle interference in phenomena like the double slit experiment. However, the interference is always with identical particles. Thus the (arguable) evidence we have from other universes show identical physical properties.
In the Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI) of quantum mechanics, the interference pattern of a single particle (such as an electron or photon) in a double-slit experiment is explained by parallel realities interacting across the multiverse rather than a single particle acting as a wave that collapses.
... Interference Between Worlds: The particle in our universe does not travel alone. Its motion is influenced and deflected by interference with its counterparts (or the surrounding quantum state) traveling through the other slit in adjacent parallel worlds

Also see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-slit_experiment
In the Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI) of quantum mechanics, the interference pattern of a single particle (such as an electron or photon) in a double-slit experiment is explained by parallel realities interacting across the multiverse rather than a single particle acting as a wave that collapses.
... Interference Between Worlds: The particle in our universe does not travel alone. Its motion is influenced and deflected by interference with its counterparts (or the surrounding quantum state) traveling through the other slit in adjacent parallel worlds
Also see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-slit_experiment
Thinkerbell · 46-50, F
@ElwoodBlues
You are confusing the many-worlds hypothesis with the multiverse hypothesis.
Many-worlds posits that every possible outcome of every quantum event actually happens, resulting in many versions of this (our) universe, where the fundamental physical constants remain the same.
The multiverse posits many separate universes (perhaps each beginning with its own big bang) in which the fundamental constants are not necessarily the same as in our universe.
https://www.discovermagazine.com/are-many-worlds-and-the-multiverse-the-same-idea-4965
https://www.scientificworldinfo.com/2026/04/can-multiverse-theory-solve-fine-tuning-mystery.html
You are confusing the many-worlds hypothesis with the multiverse hypothesis.
Many-worlds posits that every possible outcome of every quantum event actually happens, resulting in many versions of this (our) universe, where the fundamental physical constants remain the same.
The multiverse posits many separate universes (perhaps each beginning with its own big bang) in which the fundamental constants are not necessarily the same as in our universe.
https://www.discovermagazine.com/are-many-worlds-and-the-multiverse-the-same-idea-4965
https://www.scientificworldinfo.com/2026/04/can-multiverse-theory-solve-fine-tuning-mystery.html
ElwoodBlues · M
@Thinkerbell Nope. As I said
the interference pattern of a single particle ... is explained by parallel realities interacting across the multiverse rather than a single particle acting as a wave that collapses
Notice that word "multiverse" in there? Some versions of many worlds include the multiverse.
emyphant · 26-30, F
Absolutely none?










