It all comes down simply to how open or close minded you are.
You can say inabsolute is the only absolute.
…or you can say the only absolute is inabsolute.
They both mean the same thing, but one can grow, and the other cannot. Every last belief you’ll ever encounter will follow one of these two. When dealing with the same information, we decide how things can change or how they can’t and therefore where we will go or where we won’t.
You can find the choice in a world without choices, or you can see how there’s no choice in a world with choices. Seeing is believing or believing is seeing.
Again, both are accurate, just because you are right does not mean the other is wrong. Merely different points of perspective.
Yet… if they are both the same in regards to truth, then how do we fight over the their differences in regards to lies?
A being of omnipotence will never criticize one of impotence because they know it’s potential. Of course they do. After all they’re impotent.
However, the impotent one will always criticize the omnipotent because they see no potential. Of course they don’t. After all they’re omnipotent.
We’ll all criticize this world as this helps us unlock more and more of it’s secrets and we do this until we learn there was nothing to criticize. Only points of our journey that needed improvement.
As long as you criticize, you are demonstrating to the world how much you need to grow, but until you stop, you never will.
There is always more than we know and because of this, good will serve bad, this is true, but more importantly, bad also serves good. Another truth. The only falsehood there can be is in the denial of more truth.
…or you can say the only absolute is inabsolute.
They both mean the same thing, but one can grow, and the other cannot. Every last belief you’ll ever encounter will follow one of these two. When dealing with the same information, we decide how things can change or how they can’t and therefore where we will go or where we won’t.
You can find the choice in a world without choices, or you can see how there’s no choice in a world with choices. Seeing is believing or believing is seeing.
Again, both are accurate, just because you are right does not mean the other is wrong. Merely different points of perspective.
Yet… if they are both the same in regards to truth, then how do we fight over the their differences in regards to lies?
A being of omnipotence will never criticize one of impotence because they know it’s potential. Of course they do. After all they’re impotent.
However, the impotent one will always criticize the omnipotent because they see no potential. Of course they don’t. After all they’re omnipotent.
We’ll all criticize this world as this helps us unlock more and more of it’s secrets and we do this until we learn there was nothing to criticize. Only points of our journey that needed improvement.
As long as you criticize, you are demonstrating to the world how much you need to grow, but until you stop, you never will.
There is always more than we know and because of this, good will serve bad, this is true, but more importantly, bad also serves good. Another truth. The only falsehood there can be is in the denial of more truth.
