@
jarrod73 democrats are very good at” projection” the crazy things they say and do and then they go and deny it and accused the Republicans of doing it.
You do realise that the Republicans are now trying to openly interfere with the voting process all over the country, and keep getting struck down by judges at all levels?
Two losses in two courts in just three hours.
Judges across the country have repeatedly rebuked the Trump administration for its last-minute demand that California set aside 20,000 ballots that the administration claims it has evidence were cast by noncitizens —an unprecedented and possibly unconstitutional attempt to interfere with a state’s electoral process.
Today, the administration’s California gambit was rejected by two different courts in two separate cases in a matter of hours.
First, a federal judge in Washington ordered the Trump administration to stop demanding that California election officials set aside ballots from 20,000 people, writing, “The Executive Branch has likely violated the Constitution’s Elections Clause, which commits authority over election rules to the states and Congress alone.”
Then, in a separate case, the supreme court swiftly rejected the Trump administration’s emergency request this morning that it intervene on the day before the election and force California election officials to set aside the 20,000 mail ballots.
Democratic elections attorney Marc Elias called the supreme court ruling “A complete DEFEAT for Trump DOJ” noting that the court’s denial of the administration’s request came with “no noted dissents” and that the court “did not even ask for opposition briefs! “
It's blatant. But it won't work..