Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Let them eat SUVs: Trump White House orders fleet of luxury cars as Americans struggle

Americans are facing a deepening affordability crisis but at least Trump and co have ... 250 new Cadillac Escalades

By Adam Gabbatt/The Guardian
Thu 30 Jul 2026 07.00 EDT

Gas prices are up almost a dollar a gallon since the day Donald Trump took office; mortgage rates just hit their highest level in nearly a year, and over the weekend a prominent economist said the Iran war is costing the average US household more than $1,200.

Americans are struggling through a deepening affordability crisis caused largely by Trump’s ill-fated war against Iran. They are in need of a boost, something to lift the spirits. Perhaps the president could give a speech, letting the people know that we are all in this together.

Or, he could give a speech announcing that the White House has just ordered 250 brand new Cadillac Escalades, giant SUVs which have a suggested retail price of more than $90,000 each and cost significantly more to customize for secure uses.

“We ordered 250 Escalades. That’s how we look sharp in those cavalcades, you know,” Trump said during a rambling, hour-long address at a General Motors facility in Michigan.

“We look sharp in those Escalades. Our guys are very spoiled. They’re very spoiled. They like the Escalade. So do I.”

I’d like to think I would look sharp in an Escalade. But, like most people in the US, I cannot afford one: especially if, as seems likely, the White House orders the armored version of the SUV, which can cost more than $300,000. And then, of course, I’d have to fill the 24-gallon gas tank.

The symbolism of Trump’s gesture, his fiddling with car specifications while Rome burns, is consistent with his Lucille Bluth-like behavior in recent weeks. He’s dismissed “affordability” as a term concocted by Democratic political consultants to criticize his presidency, introduced a new round of tariffs likely to push up prices, and refused to sign a rare bipartisan housing bill. It’s still shocking. Even Scrooge didn’t order a new horse and cart as Tiny Tim’s health declined.

Yet here we are, in 2026, with a billionaire president crowing about spending at least $22m of Americans’ money on a fleet of luxury SUVs, an act which seems extremely unlikely to boost morale.

“Hey I know inflation is out of control and a lot of folks can’t afford basic necessities, but at least we’re tackling waste fraud and abuse by buying… *checks notes* 250 Escalades for the government,” the Angry Staffer account wrote on X, capturing much of the mood.

The announcement of the car purchase was a baffling move in what was a confusing speech. Trump’s address in Michigan was supposed to be about US auto manufacturing, but instead his remarks took on transgender rights, “Marxist protesters” and how, should Democrats win control of the government: “In one year, the country will be absolutely bankrupt. You’ll live in squalor. You’ll live in fear. You won’t have police. You won’t have firemen. You won’t have anybody.”

Trump also disclosed to the crowd that he was “sort of a clean freak, I like clean”, before claiming he had been awarded “man of the year” in Michigan 25 years ago. The latter was an interesting claim, because Trump has been claiming to have been awarded this Michigan man of the year title for a decade, and it never happened.
Top | New | Old
Mindful · 56-60, F
He probably means nominated for an award . :-/ I don't know. Some people believe their leaders deserve more than they do. It's an old worship the gods sort of obsession with higher ups. I don't think people realize that a lot is stolen, borderline or blatantly... robbed from others... it's like the thousands who payed thousands of dollars to watch a famous FIFA game... it's kinda weird that that happens but it's not okay to pay higher wages to hard workers. But it's okay to pay thousands for a few hours of a special sighting of famous people. It's a strange phenomenon
ArishMell · 70-79, M
I can understand nations keeping a few large luxury saloon cars for Head Of State use when they want to impress, and for taxi-ing foreign dignatories between airport and government building.

I can understand some nation's presidents need armoured versions, too.

Two hundred and fifty of them, though? Why so many? Who other than the President and Vice-President, a few top-level Ministers or military top brass, and occasional visiting heads of state, is going to ride in them?


I looked up the Cadillac Escalade. It is certainly a lumbering great brute of a thing. Hardly elegant: it looks like a small bus or a luxury version of a work van; but rather less useful. I suppose it appeals to very rich people who regard over-size cars with desperately poor fuel economy as a status symbol. (Just under 17 miles per US Gallon.)

I was rather surprised to find they are for sale in the UK, though I don't suppose they attract many buyers with them burning petrol at that rate (it = 14m.p. UK Gallon at prices oscillating around £6.85/gallon...I gather reflecting international difficulties). It would have very high Road Fund Licence (annual road-use tax) and very likely astronomical insurance premiums and servicing costs, too. You'd need a handy-sized garage for a car the bulk of a builder's van, and it'd be a right so-and-so to manoeuvre in a multi-storey car-park or onto a car-ferry. I suppose they appeal to the odd Premier league footballer, company-law solicitor or Canary Wharf spiv, maybe.

They are exported to Russia too. I wonder who buys them there?


The 2026 Cadillac Escalade V is priced from £199,950 in the UK.

The Escalade V in the UK features a supercharged 6.2-litre V8 engine producing 682–685 horsepower and 885 Nm of torque, delivering a 0–60 mph time of around 4.4 seconds
Cadillac...

. This high-performance SUV is based on the standard-length Escalade and comes with premium features including three-row seating with two captain’s chairs in the middle row, semi-aniline leather, high-end audio, and 22-inch wheels

(AutoExpress)

Actually the UK price quoted by AutoExpress, is confusing because in the very next of the screen-full of entries the same source reports it starting at £150 000... well, fifty quid under that. I imagine the depreciation is enormous.


Never mind, Mr Trump is rich enough to refuel 250 of them, isn't he?

Or is he buying the electric versions?
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@PeachNbelle Thankyou!

Aopart from your patronising comment about people of an age you will reach eventually; I can understand outrage about the White House ordering a huge fleet of these very costly cars.

Costly to buy, costly to run, even in a nation with relatively cheaper fuel than in many others.

Especially when you see all the complaints on SW from Americans about the prices they pay for fuel, even for normal cars that are far more economical to run than a Cadillac Escalade. (Obviously I do not know if you own a car. I have owned many, and quite a variety of them, over the last fifty or so years.)

We would expect the president of any major nation to use big, swanky cars on formal occasions, but the problem there seems many regard buying 250 of these things as sheer extravagance.

It's nothing to do with party politics and it has nothing to do with age.
PeachNbelle · 18-21, FNew
@ArishMell and my point is this order isn't out of the ordinary and the complaining is all about politics they complain because trump did it if it was biden it'll be the other way around and the people currently acting like they are mad would be mocking people acting like them. People complain about gas because that's what people do they were paying 4 dollars or more 11 years ago and according to the same people inflation is out of control so back according to them not me that 4 dollars was more like 12 so in that twisted point of view gas is cheaper than ever accounting for inflation it's 90's prices again. I personally dismissed inflation as corporate greed prices go up profits go up but everything is inflation according to them. If inflation is real increase in cost wouldn't increase profits
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@PeachNbelle Oh, yes, I am sure that would be the case: it would not matter which Party likes collecting big cars, the opposition will still criticise them!

Petrol and Diesel prices here in the UK are just as volatile, going up suddenly at the slightest twitch by the corporate and stock-markets greed, but returning at the filling-stations only slowly when the international prices fall again.

They are heavily taxed here, and because the tax is both compounded (Duty then VAT on the retail + Duty) and levvied by percentages, the retail costs rise disproportionally to wholesale price increase. They seem to reduce again more by competition than real cost changes.
Munumbis · 46-50, M
Trump is the president what do you expect him to drive a golf cart?
MoveAlong · 70-79, M
@Munumbis
Trump is the president what do you expect him to drive a golf cart?

Trump's golf cart:

Convivial · 26-30, F
Stand up, salute the flag, and bend over while your doing it
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
You suggest the gubberment should buy BMW suv's instead?
This message was deleted by the author of the main post.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
SunshineGirl · 36-40, F
@sunsporter1649 What happened to the vehicles that were tearing up the Reflecting Pool recently?
Progressive legislation and progressive politics was possible in DC when we had an educated leftist population. Long ago. Not now.
Thinkerbell · 41-45, F
"Gas prices are up almost a dollar a gallon since the day Donald Trump took office;"

I doubt that Adam Gabbatt of The Guardian ever complained about $4/gallon gas when Obama or Biden was president.

Thinkerbell · 41-45, F
@JSul3

"[Obama's] first Term Average: Around $3.12 per gallon... Second Term Average: Around $2.95 per gallon."

Those figures are in the dollars of their time. Since then, there has been about 40% cumulative inflation, so in present-day dollars, Obama's average would be over $4/gal, and his peak would be well over $5/gal, yet no one on the left (like The Guardian) was complaining. Furthermore, Obama was for fracking, despite many Democrats opposing fracking (undoubtedly because it began under Republican administrations) :

"The growing anti-fracking positions for shale oil and gas from his party, however, are the opposite of what the Obama administration promoted."

https://www.forbes.com/sites/judeclemente/2020/12/31/president-obamas-support-for-americas-shale-oil-and-natural-gas/

If Obama had been a Republican, I have no doubt that The Guardian would have been all over him for his fracking policies.

As for Biden, he sold off almost half of the US's petroleum reserve in order to lower prices.

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/10/16/biden-oil-reserve-fuels-00121298

Had Biden been a Republican, I'm sure The Guardian would have been outraged by Biden's irresponsibility.
Thinkerbell · 41-45, F
@whowasthatmaskedman

Kemo Sabe, you never responded to my comment (about 15 or 20 comments back), so here it is again:

"The complete opposite of current American economic and budgetry thinking, no matter which side is in power."

OK, let's assume everything you say is correct. Why are both sides on this catastrophic course? Surely they have economic advisors that understand economics as well as you do. Is it simply to keep the billionaire donors happy? And don't the billionaire donors have wise economic advisors too?
JSul3 · 70-79
@Thinkerbell
Historic Volume: “Biden administration drew the reserve down aggressively during the 2022 to 2023 energy shock, selling more than 200 million barrels”, as noted by Yahoo Finance. This included a historic 180-million-barrel authorization announced in 2022 following supply disruptions from Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

Percentage Drop: Total reserves fell from roughly 638 million barrels when he took office in January 2021 down to about 371 million barrels by early 2023, representing a reduction of around 42% to 45%.

Impact on Prices: A U.S. Treasury Department analysis estimated that the releases lowered gasoline prices by roughly 13 to 40 cents per gallon.

Replenishment Efforts: The administration later began purchasing tens of millions of barrels back and working to cancel congressionally mandated sales to refill the stockpile, though overall inventory levels remained low before subsequent international drawdowns occurred.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Picklebobble2 · 61-69, M
🤔I wonder if this big spend has come from his DOGE savings ?
Love to see the paperwork accouting for that.

Look out for yet another bond issue or maybe a 'tax' for any nation wanting to repatriate its own gold currently stored in the U.S
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
And they say Trump doesnt have a sense of humour..But it doesnt matter. Those things will depreciate and end up sold for five cents on the dollar, to drug lords and tin pot dictators. I would not be surprised to see Trump give one each to his kids as Christmas presents. After all. he didnt pay for them..😷
PeachNbelle · 18-21, FNew
@whowasthatmaskedman how about we stick to the tinkerbell thread you conveniently leave those comments alone while basically paraphrasing my own comments have directing it towards me. Interesting form of plagiarism just throw in a Trump rant to pass it off as your own thought
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@sunsporter1649 The answer is "no one"😷
IM5688 · 70-79, M
Your TDS is in full swing. Every administration in either party has spent millions of taxpayer dollars on things for the gov't, but because it's Trump doing now, it's news. Whenever it's anyone else, it seems that's not newsworthy enough for us to know about.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Persephonee · 26-30, F
@PeachNbelle Certainly could sue social media because that's at the root of most of the nonsense from both left and right. We'd all be a lot better off, including Trump, if we all spent more time outside without our phones.

(Says the girl on her phone...)
PeachNbelle · 18-21, FNew
Americans aren't struggling that's a lie the people struggling now have always struggled if you're not comfortable in this economy you have a balancing and budgeting issue.

When Americans are struggling the airports are empty you don't have lines out the door with families flying to florida, the marinas aren't packed with lines to refuel all day long. Theme parks aren't packed with hour long waits, you don't have 400 dollar concert tickets selling out and actually filling the seats with real people. When Americans are struggling every restaurant you go to has instant seating even something like outback or longhorns which are usually the go to for the average family gets slow but now even the high end places have packed reservations. The only people who believe the Americans are struggling lie are Americans who have always and will always struggle it's a generational thing more than anything
SunshineGirl · 36-40, F
I'm sure he was exaggerating/lying about the numbers. But the lack of self-awareness and basic empathy is still pretty staggering.

 
Post Comment