Camel Harris unqualified?

@ron122 Dems are definitely worse. But I don't really know who is nasty.

@ron122

Obviously they're a special protected class of citizens.

@PatKirby Yeah, a bunch of losers.

The admins should be sanctioned for their consistent biased behavior. However they can’t even try to defend themselves and instead hide behind the curtain. The positive for all of us is that there is no way they are making any money. @ron122 @Roundandroundwego @PatKirby @ron122

How are we going to thwart them for the good of our descendants? @PatKirby @ron122

@jackjjackson

Probably not. But since it represents a tiny miniscule percentage of the general population it's relatively negligible anyway. Lived next door to one in the 80s in Houston and my gf and I never once had a problem and he/she never made a big deal of it. Today, it's being forced into people's faces for some reason and I think that's what makes people angry. Tired of it all.

@ron122 [quote]These nasty liberals are on here day and night saying the nastiest things you can imagine about Republicans,[/quote] Only in your warped mind. The only “nasty” things I see getting said about Republicans are things that are demonstrably true, like they lie, try to rig the rules so they win elections, and try to stir up racism and xenophobia, and they value their precious guns over the lives of children. When a right winger claims that a Democratic cis woman is trans that’s hitting below the belt. First, it shows that you’re transphobic, that you hate and look down on anyone that doesn’t fit neatly into your simple, black and white notions of gender; but then it also suggests that you don’t have any legitimate gripe with the way she’s doing her job, because if you did you would simply attack her on that. Now that’s kind of ridiculous, because even I’m not thrilled with Harris’s performance as vice president, but apparently you all think your best attack against her is to say she’s trans. Finally, unlike all the attacks I’ve seen against Republicans, the claim that Harris is trans can’t be backed up with a wisp of evidence, it’s based purely on speculation.

And anytime a post violates community standards, it’s fair game to report it, in fact that’s the responsible thing to do. Must have been a year or two ago I saw a post urging readers to go “hunting Republicans” like wild animals. I reported it, and it got taken down. The mods aren’t biased, they enforce the rules outlined in the TOS.

@ron122 ... have a read of my 'Lib*ardism by numbers' post

@jackjjackson ... do you want me to answer that ... TRUTHFULLY

@JPWhoo

"...stir up racism and xenophobia..."

Candace Owens - in front of a Senate Committee - stated "Democrats ALWAYS role out racism at Election Time"

'Transphobia' - what you'll find is that NORMAL people take the attitude of 'to each their own' and 'live and let live' ... what the issue is, is that we're saying: "leave children alone, stop indoctrinating them, once they're outside the control of their parents AND if they want to ruin their lives, let them ... AND/OR at an age to fully understand what's going on"


"...like they lie ..." - EVERYTIME i have a discussion with one of these FOOLS, they always throw in the line "you're lying" {based on NO EVIDENCE of lying WHATSOEVER} - it usually happens when they're losing the argument ... when i ask them to copy & paste where i've lied, they start giving me laughing emoji's, most times it's "i can't be bothered showing you" - it's a technique used to CANCEL viewpoints different to theirs, what you'll find is, that that 'lie' is a differing viewpoint to theirs

@BigGuy2 Ah, [i]Candace Owens[/i] said it. [i]That[/i] makes it true 🙄

This very post is an example of transphobia, [i]that’s[/i] what I was referring to. Claiming Harris must be trans, like that’s some kind of attack. “NORMAL” is [i]boring[/i], it’s not something to be proud of, but again it’s an example of transphobia that you think being trans is somehow [i]abnormal[/i]. And nobody is indoctrinating children into being trans just by acknowledging their existence and treating them the way they want to be treated. The indoctrination is by the Right trying to keep kids from finding out that trans people exist or telling them that there’s something wrong with being trans and that that somehow “ruins their lives”. What ruins their lives is forcing them to be a gender that they know is wrong for them.

Maybe some liberals accuse you of lying and then refuse to try to show you what you’ve lied about, but I’ve only noticed conservatives doing that. I’ll allow that probably some on both sides do it, but we can at least agree that it’s bullshit.

[b][/b]@JPWhoo 🤪🤪🤪 ... i am going to have to start betting on what you people will say in response, i'd be a millionaire within weeks {it's quite scary that i predicted what your reply would be almost verbatim ... if you took the 'Ah' in your comment out, it would be verbatim} 🤪🤪🤪 ... {for your information, i was pointing out [b]WHAT[/b] she said, not [b]WHO[/b] said it ... i only mentioned her name, because i knew her name, if i didn't, i would have said "a person" because i was highlighting [b]what[/b] was said 🤷🏼‍♂️🤷🏼‍♂️🤷🏼‍♂️

Read my 'Lib*ardism by numbers' post:
a concept akin to 'Painting by numbers' wherein, i can predict what they'll say ... it's called 'Liberal Hiveminding'

Not 'SOME' ... [b]ALL[/b] ... one idiot even said, "you didn't say it literally, but you thought it" - i can only assume he meant this 'unconscious bias' nonsense

"... ruins their lives ..." - how many Trans have come out and have said "if i could have my time again, i wouldn't have 'changed'..."

It is 'abnormal', because there is ONLY 2 genders in the World:

[b]MALE/FEMALE[/b]

@BigGuy2 [quote]i was pointing out [b]WHAT[/b] she said, not [b]WHO[/b] said it[/quote] Okay, well I can say the world is shaped like a pyramid but that doesn’t make it so. You’ve given me no reason to believe that what you said about Democrats always using racism at election time is true. What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.

[i]All[/i] liberals do that? “All” is a pretty big generalization. I don’t believe I’ve called you a liar yet with or without evidence.

I don’t know how many trans people regret “changing”. But you don’t have to make any physical changes to be trans, and have you considered how many trans people [i]don’t[/i] regret changing?

Break’s over, that’s all I have time for.

@JPWhoo ... even if i pointed out that 99% of Democrats use racism at Election Time, from your viewpoint, it'll be something like "well, i was talking about the 1% that didn't" ... or, "well, it's not 100% is it, so you're wrong" -

...dito, with your 'Trans' comment

...dito with your 'asserted' comment as well

... you can talk about 'pyramids' all you want, but i was clarifying/highlighting WHAT was said

@BigGuy2 That’s not fair assuming what my response is going to be without giving me a chance.

But the idea that 99% of Democrats use racism at election time doesn’t pass the laugh test. I’ll admit that not even 99% of Republicans use racism to gin up votes, although a much greater percentage of them do that than Democrats.

If you’re going to claim 99% of trans people regret making “changes”, whatever you might mean by that, then my standard of proof for that is going to be sky high too.

I don’t see how 99% applies to my comment that what can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence. [i]That’s[/i] always true. Christopher Hitchens first stated that btw fwiw.

[quote]but I was clarifying/highlighting WHAT was said[/quote] What was said carries no weight, it’s worthless without evidence to back it up.

@JPWhoo ... who said anything about claiming 99%, not me ... re-read, then get back to me 🤷🏼‍♂️🤷🏼‍♂️🤷🏼‍♂️

... i gave up providing evidence to you FOOLS, because when i did provide it, they refuted it to the 7th degree

@JPWhoo ... there you go again "...evidence to back it up..." - shall i name the maybe 30 million ??? people who make up the Democrats, and place a tick next to each name, yay or nay 🤷🏼‍♂️🤷🏼‍♂️🤷🏼‍♂️

@BigGuy2 [quote]they refuted it to the 7th degree [/quote] That’s what you’re supposed to do if you can. Are you afraid of finding out that you’re wrong?

Idk what you could present to demonstrate that racism is [i]widespread[/i] in the Democratic Party, if it were true. But Republicans don’t even try anymore to expand their base by reaching out to anyone other than their very narrow demographics of old, straight, cisgender, white, Christian, men. Their whole strategy is to stir up grievances against those groups, which often crosses the line into racism, xenophobia, transphobia, etc. And then of course those demographics aren’t enough to win anymore except in very rural areas, so the fact that they’re not trying to expand their base at all leads to anti democratic tactics like gerrymandering, disenfranchising legitimate voters, making it more difficult for citizens to vote, and giving power to state legislatures to overturn the will of the people on any given whim.

Like many dems you’re in denial of the fact that most folks of Hispanic heritage are repulsed by the dem philosophy of attempting to prevent immigrants who work hard and desire to succeed actually successes and are against the concept of redistributing their money to those they choose not to work. In additional with more frequency black view dems the same way. @JPWhoo

@jackjjackson sounds fascistic. Thanx for the warning. We're not you- working in a capitalist system and putting people down for not doing it isn't enlightened politics. It's war

Just helping you and reality become acquainted. @Roundandroundwego