Are certain weapons too destructive and powerful for the general public to own?

Maybe its the people we need to be a bit more concerned with not the guns.

Fortunately for us , the constitution protects the rights of Americans to keep and bear arms . In the case of Uvalde, TX, it seems a BB gun would have been too powerful for the police there.

If you are afraid of guns, don’t own one .

It's not the guns it's the people, no matter how many gun laws we pass if someone wants to do harm they're gonna find a way.

Lmao... Even countries where guns are illegal still have ways that you can get guns if that's what you want to own.

No matter what you might do, there's ways around anything if you are creative enough.

What actually constitutes too powerful? Based on this post and some others I'm seeing...you wouldn't happen to be thinking of the AR-15, would you?

Depends on what you mean "certain weapons too destructive and powerful for the general public to own". If you mean MSR's which include semi-auto AR15 sty7le rifles then "NO" as they are less powerful and deadly than many pistols, rifle and shotguns used for hunting. AR15's are not assault rifles as they are not full auto rifles they are like semi auto shotguns, rifles and pistols. If you are stating things like tanks, fully armed attack aircraft, missiles and weapons that can disperse toxic gasses, chemical and bio-hazards..........then yes those should not be allowed in the general public. [b][i]And if you are one of those possessing very low intelligence then you should get educated so that you know more people are killed with hands, feet, knives, clubs and liberals texting while driving. People can make very deadly explosives and bio-weapons at home that will kill many more people and more effectively than any rifle or pistol. A semi-auto hunting style shotgun loaded with buck shot will kill many more people in close quarters than any AR15, pistol or rifle.[/i][/b]

misinformation in the hands on an idiot is more dangerous than the most deadly weapon in the hands of a law abiding citizen...

It's becoming increasingly well researched and bang-me-over-the-head obvious that young shooters who smoke highly potent WEED with high THC levels can quickly become psychotic or schizophrenic.

Highly potent levels of THC cause or induce psychosis increase the likelihood of irrational behavior in teens. Weed use among our young is a planned event. It makes huge money for the cartels.

SANE people have no problem, as a general rule, owning and handling any level of firearm.

The Socialist Great Reset does require that the population be disarmed.

The chief of Uvalde is a Beto donor, a Hispanic politician. He probably arranged for the Hispanic Trans guy to be armed with guns he could not afford so that he could shoot Hispanic children while the Hispanic cops kept parents from helping while the children bled out. Then, a white guy popped a cap in the gunman ending the siege. You're welcome.

It's not the gun. It's not even about race, but with some libs trying to spin yet another narative I felt some reality was needed.

Investigate. I believe some or all Uvalde cops should be charged as accessories to murder.

I have to laugh at the idea of any weapons ban. Is Beto going to go to Mexico and show us how to disarm the drug cartels? Hmmm? Will he send cops to collect guns, the same cops that let children bleed out while they stop parents from helping, because it is less dangerous to stop a helper than a single gunman?! How about the military, whose brass couldn't secure Afghanistan in twenty fucking years?!

That is exactly how you frame the conversation for gun reform .

I do not think the general public should own nuclear weapons. I think we can scale back from there but there's clearly a line of reasonableness.

So you fully trust 100% of the police officers of the world to have more and better weapons than yourself

I think you and others commenting on this should go to these and read as it might help unless you are hopelessly brainwashed.

[b][i]The Crisis of Fatherless Shooters[/i][/b]
https://www.heritage.org/marriage-and-family/commentary/the-crisis-fatherless-shooters
[u]ALSO [/u]
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/community-family/we-must-confront-the-cultural-mess-that-gave-us-uvalde

One user on here was wanting to use tanks against school shooters. Sure let's just nuke the school in order to get one person🙄

Too much common sense involved for our politicians to get behind the concept.

Dirty Harry had the right calibre

You can legally buy a .50 cal rifle. Sure, it's a hunting weapon, if you're intent on killing an elephant from a distance of 1200 yards.

Second Amendment, Bro

[image deleted]