Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Why do musicians stop making music?

Countless examples of amazing artists, writing song after song, and then one day, they just stop, and you never hear from them again.
Do they just get burned out? Bored? Can't do it anymore?

A few return to play the old music, but they just don't seem to write new stuff. What's the deal with that?
ArishMell · 70-79, M
Does anyone encourage them?


Pop music in its various flavours is very much at the mercy of narrow-minded commerce interested in only the ephemeral and latest. That was always so but it seems becoming ever more crushing professionally and artistically.

If published by a streaming service, even if the company pays all the royalties due (questionable) it is likely to delete the recording after some time that probably has no artistic merit or purpose. I think the same applies to films.

There is little encouragement to be creative - many of the Big Names now are so as celebrities rather than creatives. Their works are all derivative, to match the fashion probably driven by commercial publishers like Amazon and commercial-radio. I don't know what proportion of them can even strum a few chords, write a single rhyming couplet and attach it to a few crochets, or sing in pitch.


In the UK at least, there are far fewer music shops - i.e. shops that sell instruments and equipment, sheet-music, manuscript books. The record shops have largely gone, as well, shrinking via those depressing baskets of "Best of..." anthologies on tapes then CDs sold in supermarkets and motorway-services. Who decides what is the "best", of whom, how?

Many schools are reported to have pushed the arts off the curriculum, or at least side-lined them, under government-inspired ("inspired"?) initiatives to spend dwindling funds on the so-called "STEM" * subjects as priority. Fortunately this is not universal - some schools do still have excellent arts as well as the technical departments.

We have also lost many live-music venues, especially pubs, for the amateur and semi-professional bands. Although most of those play covers, some as "tribute bands", they are bands: whatever their material they do play their own instruments. At least this provides a sort of apprenticeship for the few who manage to go beyond and start making a name for themselves with their own works.


The future is not all bleak. That is primarily about pop and rock but while they stagnate on the whims of huge commercial imperatives, the "classical" field covers a vast range of styles not only Classical, and appears very healthy. A lot of music, both existing and newly-composed, is being released by independent publishers in various ways including CDs and even vinyl. A lot of music is being composed now, many young musicians are entering this field.

.....

*It stands for ("Science, Technology [whatever that is], Engineering [probably with little or no practical learning] and Mathematics [ or just arithmetic?]" )
Picklebobble2 · 56-60, M
These days it's probably down to control over use.

Roger Daltrey of The Who recently said that the digital age means you either have to create an exclusive fee paying website in order to make your work accessible only to those prepared to pay exclusively for it or you have to do deals with the likes of Amazon or YouTube or Spotify that are worse today than when they were at the height of their fame in the late 60's.
CrazyMusicLover · 31-35
My guess is it's one of these reasons:

1) They got tired of the overall lifestyle. Perhaps they still make music but not professionally, therefore what they make they make just for their own enjoyment without all the hassle around publishing. Especially if they became famous and made lots of money, therefore they can afford to withdraw from the publuc life and do whatever they want to do.

2) The priorities in their life changed, most probably because they started a family and they wanted a more stable way of income in a day job and to spend more time with family.

3) They had an accident or a degenerative disease that made them unable to play as before or they simply reached the point when they had to decide whether they wanted to keep playing or keep their health.

4) They lost interest and started another career.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
swirlie · 31-35, F
@WhereTheCloudsareFarBehindMe
I'm very much the same way! Would you mind if I borrowed this one of your's because it says what I usually tend to say anyway?! lol!
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
swirlie · 31-35, F
ArtieKat · M
A few older musicians - and I'm thinking of Rod Stewart and Boz Scaggs in particular - return to the songs which were popular when they were young (The Great American Songbook) and re-interpret them for a contemporary audience. Some music is timeless.
helenS · 36-40, F
@ArtieKat I think that Stewart's voice doesn't work particularly well in the context of the Great Songbook. The original singers (such as Frank S., or Dino) were simply much much better singers, and the songs are too sophisticated for a guy like Stewart. It's not that he can't sing, just not these songs. Just my East Slobovonian 2cts.
ChipmunkErnie · 70-79, M
For many it isn't that they quit making music, it's that the record/music companies stop releasing the music commercially. Many musicians don't record any more because of economic reasons, but they continue to write, play small venues, etc.
BabyDolls · 22-25, T
Like in many careers people walk away when they reach what they believe is the top so theyre career doesn't go down
JamesBugman · 56-60, T
@BabyDolls I was thinking maybe they get to a point that if they add more, they will start to forget all the old stuff they used to play? Brain is full kind of thing. Still, if they love music, you would think they would keep going.
BabyDolls · 22-25, T
@JamesBugman i seen that both eminem and lil wayne research themselves when writing songs to make sure they havent already used it so that's possible too
Times change. Want to challenge your ears? Then seek out some different genres. Instead of commercial radio, try NPR and college stations. Everyone is streaming.
They may still be creating but aren't releasing anything for a variety of reasons. Or they've hit a creative roadblock and aren't inspired anymore.
fun4us2b · M
Its probably many different reasons...people are so random
Lack of inspiration, change of goals or interest idk.
WanderlustCat · 36-40, M
They generally stop making music when they start decomposing.
SW-User
They run out of good ideas?
JamesBugman · 56-60, T
@SW-User Maybe they know every chord, every nuance, every song, and just decide they can't go any further?
swirlie · 31-35, F
I think because they're stuck in the past and only identify with a certain sound or style. The 1970's band 'Chicago' failed for that very reason.
JamesBugman · 56-60, T
@swirlie True, there are some artists that cannot play anything outside their usual.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
JamesBugman · 56-60, T
@FreestyleArt It certainly is a lot harder to make money in it. Are these amazing artists only in it for the money?
Yes true, lots of amazing undiscovered artists out there.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
JamesBugman · 56-60, T
@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout Maybe after being kicked out of several groups they lose heart?
This comment is hidden. Show Comment

 
Post Comment