Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »
Top | New | Old
ChampagneOnIce · 51-55, F
So, are you offended by the first amendment?
@ChampagneOnIce Until the finger pointing and "all the problems are on the other side" stuff stops, there can be no meaningful discussions about change. Like in marriage .. if you arent seeing your own faults and contributions you arent likely to change what you need to alongside the other. If its us v them instead of us v the problem, things stalemate.

We need different leaders, on both sides, to get there.
ChampagneOnIce · 51-55, F
@BrandNewMan On that we agree completely.
Thrust · 56-60, M
@ChampagneOnIce

And this has what to do with the 1st amendment?

SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
I'm glad. I was appalled that he choose to spread misinformation on his show.

People like this think they can spread disinformation because their peer group says it's ok.

This is the same narrative that got Kirk killed in the first place, disparaging Trump supporters and other people with whom they don't agree. They call them names, say they are dangerous and spread false information about the Trump administration's actions. Then they pretend it's the right wing that set up this narrative, when it is not.

Enough is enough.
DogMan · 61-69, M
I'm not sure if new leaders will solve the problems. The ideology is ingrained in the people.

I think if the left rebuked the Woke ideology it would go a long way in fixing things.
Jackrules · 56-60
Rachel Maddow Next!!
DogMan · 61-69, M
@Jackrules If Maddow was killed, could the right say it was Democrats that killed her?
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@TexChik Yup

 
Post Comment