Water for Elephants is like Titanic without the sinking ship

Poll - Total Votes: 6

Yes, I see that now!

What you talkin about Willis?

Show Results

You can only vote on one answer.

Top | Newest First | Oldest First

rosyhills · 31-35, F

great movie.
It's one of those movies I've passed up several times

fun4us2b · M

@rosyhills Which one I wonder? 🤔

Penny · 46-50, F

That was a good book. The movie was okay

fun4us2b · M

@Penny I like period pieces like that too - the book always brings you deeper...

The similarity between the 2 is of course the "taken" female lead vs. the "peasant" love interest...

This comment is hidden. Show Comment

TheOneyouwerewarnedabout · 46-50, MVIP

3 hr suckfest?

fun4us2b · M

@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout Aw c'mon, you know you loved it!

TheOneyouwerewarnedabout · 46-50, MVIP

@fun4us2b about as much as i love anal seepage...

fun4us2b · M

@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout So 7 out of 10 then? 😅

ffony · M

You didn't see the elephant?

fun4us2b · M

@ffony I did but he was flying!

OogieBoogie · F

Ooh, ill raise you ' Water for Elephants', with "Under the skin" .

Phucking psychosocial art fest of silence, improvised dialogue, almost no plot for the first hour and Scarlett Johansen artistically in the buff.

I could have happily stabbed myself instead.

fun4us2b · M

@OogieBoogie Oh my, sounds like a Must See - Not 😅

OogieBoogie · F

@fun4us2b yeah.....dont .
Its an hour and whatever that i won't get back 😭

LordShadowfire · 46-50, M

So, a movie I will literally never watch?

fun4us2b · M

@LordShadowfire They are the same movie in different settings....sorta....

Add a comment...