Strongtea · 22-25, M
Twice as long as half.
NerdySoph · 26-30, F
10 to the power of -33 cm
View 9 more replies »
Matt85 · 36-40, M
X
Jlhzfromep · M
Probably the square root of a negative number…. Or 1” less than you needed it to be
OliRos · 22-25, F
@Jlhzfromep Trust you to bring up Black Holes.
OliRos · 22-25, F
@sarabee1995 🤷♀️ More that they were never there in the first place. 😂😂
Jlhzfromep · M
@OliRos touché
wildbill83 · 41-45, M
if you need it, it's never long enough; and if you don't need it, its a tangled up mess that takes forever to pick up...
OliRos · 22-25, F
@wildbill83 I think you need some lessons in string theory.
Nimbus · M
It's like Pi.
There is no known answer ;)
There is no known answer ;)
justlooking2023 · 56-60, M
A g string?
OliRos · 22-25, F
@justlooking2023 Are you musical?
justlooking2023 · 56-60, M
@OliRos At one point i was.

SW-User
As long as it needs to be.

SW-User
@OliRos okay. Describe the string.
OliRos · 22-25, F
@SW-User I can tell you that it looks like string, feels like string, smells like string. If it could waddle or quack, it would waddle and quack like string. It is echt string.
The only thing I cannot tell you is how long it is.
The only thing I cannot tell you is how long it is.
OliRos · 22-25, F
And now I must get back to my law books and leave this research in your capable hands.
Evened · 51-55, M
Exactly one string-piece unit.
OliRos · 22-25, F
@Evened 🙄 Pay attention. It's length (longness) is exact, in that it is the only measurable distance between the two ends of the piece of string when it is laid in a straight line. That longness is indisputable.
However, the length represented by that indisputable longness is indisputably, and exactly, too short for the purpose of being the garment already referenced.
So, longness is exact. Shortness is exact.
QED
However, the length represented by that indisputable longness is indisputably, and exactly, too short for the purpose of being the garment already referenced.
So, longness is exact. Shortness is exact.
QED
Ontheroad · M
The same measurement as the distance "up".
ArtieKat · M
You're pulling on my heartstrings, Olivia! 🤏🏼
OldBrit · 61-69, M
Never the length you want
StevetheSleeve · 31-35, M
There are theories.
OliRos · 22-25, F
@StevetheSleeve Very true. Do you have one up your sleeve?
StevetheSleeve · 31-35, M
@OliRos Lol. My thoughts on this are pretty one-dimensional.
OliRos · 22-25, F
@StevetheSleeve That is the point.
Shaveit · 61-69, M
Or how many pieces make a whole string?
jackrabbit10 · M
how long would a string have to be .to not be a string,
OliRos · 22-25, F
@jackrabbit10 If it has any length, it has the potential to be a bit of string. Without length, it has the potential not to exist at all.
Thevy29 · 41-45, M
It should say it on the pack.
Jonjdw · 51-55, M
Did you use A tape measure
KiwiBird · 36-40, F
42

SW-User
Roughly... 🤏
OliRos · 22-25, F
@SW-User More or less...
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment

SW-User
Typically one ball long

SW-User
@OliRos I missed a letter. There needs to be a standard. Then I could determine if mine met requirements.
OliRos · 22-25, F
@SW-User Is it easier for your balls to pass through the eye of a needle, than for a poor man to get served in the cocktail bar at The Randolph?

SW-User
@OliRos It probably is. Prices are outrageous at The Randolph.
sarabee1995 · 26-30, FVIP
🤣🤣🤣
OliRos · 22-25, F
@sarabee1995 It's the theory of string...
Dainbramadge · 56-60, M
2 inches short than we need.

SW-User
As long as it's lo g enough to strangle people with, I don't care 😅

SW-User
@OliRos joke's on them. I have more.
Also, if I start with law enforcement there will be fewer people trying to catch me 🤟
Also, if I start with law enforcement there will be fewer people trying to catch me 🤟
OliRos · 22-25, F
@SW-User The only flaw in your plan. If you start with law enforcement, everyone will be out to get you.

SW-User
@OliRos I'll take my chances
NoGamesTolerated · F
The length you snip it at!