Top | Newest First | Oldest First
Madmonk · M
Seems to be the tactic of the winning side. Hard to argue with results. I guess it only depends on how long the masses will be oppress willingly.
SW-User
The key word being unforgivable - it renders the statement moot.
If I were to lie to the Gestapo in order to save lives then that would be acceptable.
If I were to lie to the Gestapo in order to save lives then that would be acceptable.
Castenmas · M
@SW-User Even if that lie killed others?
SW-User
Iwillwait · M
No
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
That's why you have to ask yourself whether the solution is actually objectively better than the problem before you begin. If you're doing more harm than good, stop.
Castenmas · M
@LordShadowfire That depends on if that person is able to accurate assess harm or even agree what harm is with the victims of their actions.
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
@Castenmas That's true. It's also true that nobody can really foresee 100% of the consequences of their actions, but you have to do something.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment