Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

HOW COME KENNEDY, JOHNSON, FORD, CARTER, REAGAN, BUSH, CLINTON, BUSH, AND OBAMA GOT TO TAKE SECRET SECRET PAPERS HOME, ESPECIALLY BIDUMB. WHY ?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
MarthannBann888 · 70-79, F
@LeopoldBloom

I don't really blame you for your opinion because that is what has been presented to you and everyone else.

If you can, let's dial back the temperature.

Do you suppose that there might be some folks lying besides Trump and friends?

My First husband lied about everything in his life, he even lied about his birthday cake. He would tell me he hated liars, that everyone else was a liar. But him.

Suppose those people who are telling you Trump is a shit human being are lying? Just for arguments sake.

Here is a train of thought for you to consider.

The Donald is running for president??
Thought he was a democrat.
Well, he is a good father.
He is not as connected to the establishment as the others.
The most administrative experience.

Books have not been written about the people he murdered.
He knows a lot about people around the world.
He likes me.
He wants people to have good lives at their own expense.
He wants working people to be able to keep some of what they make.
He thinks there should be enough research on green cars to ensure they balance what they use with what they save yin energy.
Trump cannot be bought.
People who can be bought hate him.
He never said he had all those women. He said he could have them because some women throw them selves at rich men. I know that is true. They are called groupies. I listened to the tape many times. What they said was simply not true.
To be scathing is one thing. To lie and be scathing is cheap.
LordShadowfire · 100+, M
@MarthannBann888
If you can, let's dial back the temperature.
That's rich, considering the fact that you came in hot, calling people names and spreading your huge pile of "alternative facts" with no evidence.
MarthannBann888 · 70-79, F
@LordShadowfire So, following the line of reasoning of someone besides your self, you don't like. As for me, if I belonged to a party that murdered a president in effigy every night in Central Park for a summer, would shut my little mouth and hope no body remembered.
But, i do remember how cruel and vulgar that really was, so don't rich me, you name calling little s**t!
LordShadowfire · 100+, M
@MarthannBann888 Oh, I'm a little fucking shit? I never burned any president in effigy, but guess what? That's covered under the first goddamn amendment, so how about you quit your crying for once in your sad, homophobic, racist existence?

But you won't, will you? You'll melt down like a true fucking snowflake.
MarthannBann888 · 70-79, F
@LordShadowfire
Wow! I was wrong! You are a big s**t!
Name calling big s**t at that! I guess it easy to call people names when you can't get out of a shower of rain.
Even the names you call me are from somebody else. If you are going to be that mean, it's cheap not to have an original thought. I can dial up cnn and hear every thing you say and everything you do not say.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
@MarthannBann888
I guess it easy to call people names when you can't get out of a shower of rain.
You have been showering something on @LordShadowfire, but I daresay it is not rain.
MarthannBann888 · 70-79, F
@LordShadowfire
Good way to avoid talking about what is being done to the country. Also, you want what you say is proof, we both know you will discount any proof i put forth. Because you are to confound conservative thought.
You want confiscatory taxes.
Plenty of corruption.
New votes flooding the border.
Crime rewarded.
You get boss the rest of us around.
Everything is you way.
LordShadowfire · 100+, M
@MarthannBann888
Also, you want what you say is proof, we both know you will discount any proof i put forth.
How did I know that would be the next bit of bullshit you would put forth? Anything to avoid actually sharing links to reliable sources.
@MarthannBann888 Trump switched to the GOP because his white nationalist agenda plays better in that party than with the Democrats. As for him being a great administrator, he has a string of bankruptcies and failed businesses to his credit. If he had simply invested his inheritance in blue chip stocks and spent his life sitting by the pool cashing dividend checks, he'd be wealthier today than he is.

It's hilarious how you think Trump "can't be bought." That might have worked in 2015 when all anyone knew about him was that he was a real estate developer and host of The Apprentice.

I've already said, it doesn't help that Trump is a shit human being, but that's not why I oppose him. I oppose him because he's corrupt, incompetent, and for his conservative political agenda. From what I can tell, Liz Cheney is a decent person, honest, and competent, but if she's the nominee, I won't support her either because she's a far-right conservative extremist.
That is because @MarthannBann888 has no links from reliable sources.

@LordShadowfire
LordShadowfire · 100+, M
@LeopoldBloom I know, right? It's the same with Mike Pence. I don't hate the guy, and I actually admire him for standing up to Trump in the end, but I still wouldn't vote for his ass.
MarthannBann888 · 70-79, F
@CorvusBlackthorne
Corv, you are so smart. This is rarified air, indeed.
@MarthannBann888 I am simply an observer of things which are obvious.
MarthannBann888 · 70-79, F
@CorvusBlackthorne
So observe this you ignorant blind observer.

"the Chinese government is committed to the acquisition of western machine tool technology" especially where it is difficult for outsiders "to distinguish between civilian and military end-uses of the equipment".

Report of the Select Committee on U.S. National Security and Military/Commercial on U.S. Concerns with the People's Republic China, HR Rep., @ 751 (1999).

I believe we can say this is a precursor of our present danger.
MarthannBann888 · 70-79, F
"The initial announcement of Rosemont Seneca's and the Chinese government's Bohai Harvest joint investment fund in December 2013 revealed plans for a one billion dollar investment. Seven months later they increased it to 1.5 billion.
"Chao Deng, " Bohai, Harvest and US investment Firms Expand Target for Outbound Fund." Wall Street Journal, July 10, 2014.
SevIsPamprinYouAlways · 56-60, F
@MarthannBann888 Speaking of mocking the effigy of a president:

SevIsPamprinYouAlways · 56-60, F
@MarthannBann888

Speaking of precursors of present danger:


From the noted conservative newspaper, the New York Post