@SW-User
My argument is centered around individuals traveling to Qatar and then complaining about their culture and laws.
The world cup features many players from around the world. Players who may be atheist, gay, Christian, black, white, pagan, straight, married etc. etc. FIFA mainly got people to play there through
bribes and it was a select few individuals responsible for that. So the reason they're even there in the first place is for very illegitimate reasons which makes your reason for defending Qatar a moot point to begin with.
Qatar says respect their culture but no one's going there to disrespect their culture, they're going there to play games. They just may happen to be gay and wear the rainbow to represent themselves. Qatar just sees it as disrespect but it's not really disrespectful, they just can't stand the fact that people aren't majority Muslim and/or have the same beliefs as them.
Which is this even an argument? It really shouldn't be.
I could see it if people from other countries came and were being disrespectfully racist towards Muslims like disrespecting Mosques and calling them names but disrespect to Qatar at least, just means having gay people there because they don't like gay people. Knowing that different people from all walks of life seems to bother them.
It's not disrespectful in the least, there's no physical or verbal harassment of Muslims in Qatar, they just don't like gay people existing and their own personal feelings is on them. Bigotry shouldn't be seen as a "right" sorry not sorry.
they are failing to consider that I may not agree with Qatar to the extent that I support their laws
You've said in your own words that you admire their traditional ways:
I admire them for being so firm. The West is too weak
They imprison gay people and take away women's rights. Yet you admire how "firm" they are in their laws. If you didn't support their laws, you wouldn't be saying that.
You also wouldn't be saying that the West is weak, it's how I know you're an extremist. Back before modern day, abuse wasn't really a thing especially domestic abuse. For instance rape wasn't really seen as rape if it involved a husband even if he was abusive. Divorce also was heavily frowned upon so people kind had to deal with their abusive spouse whether they liked it or not unless they eventually took an ax to them.
Kids weren't seen as kids means they could have children working in factories much like developing worlds during modern day. I'll never forget seeing a 4 year old chimney sweeper. Like look, I don't doubt that his parents loved him but for the longest kids weren't kids. They were expected to grow up at 12 and have babies by 13 years old. I've seen people who were raised like that and they are almost full of trauma.
But hey maybe we should go back to that because to you, this means that the United States of before was "strong" err somehow. And you expect me not to find your viewpoint as self destructive?
And oh yeah, saying you're self destructive has nothing to do with agreeing with me or not, it has everything to do with the "types" of people you so defend.