I think those who claim to advocate for " free speech "

That’s [b]exactly[/b] what it’s about. They want consequence-free speech. Our First Amendment, here in the U.S. only protects freedom (in most but not all cases) from being imprisoned for one’s speech. It doesn’t mean you can’t be fired, sued for libel or slander, or face any other kind of backlash by those who disagree.

There's no such thing as free speech because every action has a consequence.

You might like to [i]think[/i] you have no responsibility for that consequence, but you do.

[quote] I support free speech as long as the left agree with the view [/quote]

There we are, fixed your post for you.

Yes. There are always consequences. I just want them to be for the person who spoke. But truth in reporting events should always be a solid defence..😷

In Jacobin - a publication -they came out in favor of the obvious+ a public Internet. It's definitely a government responsibility.
But nobody sees that here except weirdos like me - okay only me. Maybe not even me. Okay - p unless you're me you don't know nothing about no public nothing. That's communist. I'm the only communist in left.

While censoring you back

Yep, 100% this.

I ❤️ Censorship

... or are Democrats that try to cancel you when they disagree with someone elses right to 'freedom of speech'